REMARKS
BY PRESIDENT OBAMA IN ADDRESS TO EUROPEAN YOUTH
THE
WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
March 26, 2014
Notes:
(a)
Highlights
have been added.
(b)
When Pres. Obama speaks of the
New International World Order remember
the accusation
Gorbachev leveled
on Pres. Clinton for the ten year delay his administration inflicted on
such plan.
Palais
des Beaux Arts
Brussels, Belgium
6:16 P.M. CET
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Thank you so much.
Thank you. (Applause.) Please, please have a seat. Good
evening. Goede
avond. Bonsoir. Guten abend.
(Applause.) Thank you,
Laura, for that
remarkable introduction. Before she came out she told me not to be
nervous. (Laughter.) And I can
only imagine -- I think her father is
in the audience, and I can only imagine how proud he is of her. We're
grateful for her work, but
she's also reminding us that our future
will be defined by young people like her.
Your Majesties, Mr. Prime Minister, and
the people of Belgium -- on behalf of the American people, we are
grateful for your friendship.
We stand together as inseparable
allies, and I thank you for your wonderful hospitality. I have to admit
it is easy to love a country
famous for chocolate and beer.
(Laughter.)
Leaders and dignitaries of the European
Union; representatives of our NATO Alliance; distinguished guests: We
meet here at a moment of
testing
for Europe and the United States, and for the international order that
we have worked for generations to build.
Throughout human
history, societies have grappled with fundamental questions of how to
organize themselves, the proper relationship between the
individual and the state, the best means to resolve inevitable
conflicts between states. And it was here in Europe, through centuries of
struggle -- through war and Enlightenment, repression and revolution --
that a particular set of ideals began to emerge: The belief that through conscience and
free will, each of us has the right to live as we choose.
The
belief that power is derived from the consent
of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be established
to protect that understanding. And those ideas eventually inspired
a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the
founding documents that still guide America today, including
the simple truth that all men -- and women -- are created equal.
But those ideals have also been tested
-- here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been
threatened by an older, more
traditional view of power. This
alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too
small-minded to govern their own affairs, that
order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their
rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often, this alternative
vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or
ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others, and that
individual identity must be defined by
“us” versus “them,” or that national greatness must flow not by what a
people stand for, but by
what they are against.
In many ways, the history of Europe in
the 20th century represented the ongoing clash of these two sets of
ideas, both within nations and
among nations. The advance of industry
and technology outpaced our ability to resolve our differences
peacefully, and even among the most
civilized of societies, on the surface
we saw a descent into barbarism.
This morning at Flanders Field, I was
reminded of how war between peoples sent a generation to their deaths
in the trenches and gas of
the First World War. And just two
decades later, extreme nationalism plunged this continent into war once
again -- with populations
enslaved, and great cities reduced to
rubble, and tens of millions slaughtered, including those lost in the
Holocaust.
It
is in response to this tragic history that, in the aftermath of World
War II, America joined with Europe to reject the darker forces
of
the past and build a new architecture of peace. Workers and
engineers gave life to the Marshall Plan. Sentinels stood vigilant in a
NATO Alliance that would become the
strongest the world has ever known. And across the Atlantic, we
embraced a shared vision of Europe --
a
vision based on representative democracy, individual rights, and a
belief that nations can meet the interests of their citizens through trade
and open markets; a social safety net and respect for those of
different faiths and backgrounds.
For decades, this vision stood in sharp
contrast to life on the other side of an Iron Curtain.
For decades, a contest was waged, and
ultimately that contest was won -- not
by tanks or missiles, but because our
ideals stirred the hearts of Hungarians who sparked a
revolution;
Poles in their shipyards who stood in Solidarity; Czechs who waged a
Velvet Revolution without firing a shot; and East
Berliners
who marched past the guards and finally tore down that wall.
Today, what would have seemed
impossible in the trenches of Flanders, the rubble of Berlin, or a
dissident's prison cell -- that reality
is taken for granted. A Germany
unified. The nations of Central and Eastern Europe welcomed into the
family of democracies. Here in this
country, once the battleground of
Europe, we meet in the hub of a Union that brings together age-old
adversaries in peace and
cooperation. The
people of Europe, hundreds of millions of citizens -- east, west,
north, south -- are more secure and more prosperous because
we stood together for the ideals we share.
And this story of human progress was by
no means limited to Europe. Indeed, the ideals that came to define our
alliance also inspired
movements across the globe among those
very people, ironically, who had too often been denied their full
rights by Western powers. After
the Second World War, people
from Africa to India threw off the yoke of colonialism to
secure their independence. In the United States,
citizens took freedom rides and endured
beatings to put an end
to segregation and to secure their civil rights. As
the Iron Curtain fell
here in Europe, the iron fist of
apartheid was unclenched, and Nelson Mandela emerged upright, proud,
from prison to lead a multiracial
democracy. Latin
American nations rejected dictatorship and built new
democracies, and Asian
nations showed that development and
democracy
could go hand in hand.
Young people in the audience today,
young people like Laura, were born in a place and a time where there is
less conflict, more
prosperity and more freedom than any
time in human history. But that's not because man's darkest impulses
have vanished. Even here, in
Europe, we've seen ethnic cleansing in
the Balkans that shocked the conscience.
The
difficulties of integration and globalization, recently amplified by
the worst economic crisis of our lifetimes, strained the
European
project and stirred the rise of a politics that too often targets
immigrants or gays or those who seem somehow different.
While technology has opened up vast
opportunities for trade and innovation and cultural understanding, it's
also allowed terrorists to
kill on a horrifying scale. Around the
world, sectarian warfare and ethnic conflicts continue to claim
thousands of lives. And once
again, we are confronted with the
belief among some that bigger nations can bully smaller ones to get
their way -- that recycled maxim
that might somehow makes right.
So I come here today to insist that we
must never take for granted the progress that has been won here in
Europe and advanced around the
world, because the contest of ideas
continues for your generation. And that's what's at stake in Ukraine
today. Russia's leadership is
challenging truths that only a few
weeks ago seemed self-evident -- that in the
21st century, the
borders of Europe cannot be redrawn with
force, that international law matters, that people and nations can make
their own decisions about their future.
To be honest, if we defined our
interests narrowly, if we applied a cold-hearted calculus, we might
decide to look the other way. Our
economy is not deeply integrated with
Ukraine's.
Our people and our homeland face no direct threat from the invasion of
Crimea. Our own borders
are not threatened by Russia's annexation. But that kind of
casual indifference would ignore the lessons that are written in the
cemeteries of this continent. It would allow the old way of doing
things to regain a foothold in this young century. And that message
would be heard not just in Europe, but
in Asia and the Americas, in Africa and the Middle East.
And the consequences that would arise
from complacency are not abstractions. The impact that they have on the
lives of real people -- men
and women just like us -- have to enter
into our imaginations. Just look at the young people of Ukraine who
were determined to take back
their future from a government rotted
by corruption -- the portraits of the fallen shot by snipers, the
visitors who pay their respects
at the Maidan. There was the university
student, wrapped in the Ukrainian flag, expressing her hope that “every
country should live by
the law.” A postgraduate student,
speaking of her fellow protestors, saying, “I want these people who are
here to have dignity.” Imagine
that you are the young woman who said,
“there are some things that fear, police sticks and tear gas cannot
destroy.”
We've never met these people, but we
know them. Their voices echo calls for human dignity that rang out in
European streets and squares
for generations. Their voices echo
those around the world who at this very moment fight for their dignity.
These Ukrainians rejected a
government that was stealing from the
people instead of serving them, and are reaching for the same ideals
that allow us to be here
today.
None
of us can know for certain what the coming days will bring in Ukraine,
but I am confident that eventually those voices -- those voices
for human dignity and opportunity and individual rights and rule of law
-- those voices ultimately will triumph. I
believe that over the long haul, as nations that are
free, as free people, the future is ours. I
believe this not because I'm naïve, and I believe this
not because of the strength of our
arms or the size of our economies, I
believe this because these ideals that we affirm are true; these
ideals are universal.
Yes, we believe in democracy -- with
elections that are free and fair; and independent judiciaries and
opposition parties; civil society
and uncensored information so that
individuals can make their own choices. Yes, we believe in open
economies based on free markets and
innovation, and individual initiative
and entrepreneurship, and trade and investment that creates a broader
prosperity. And, yes, we
believe in human dignity -- that every
person is created equal, no matter who you are, or what you look like,
or who you love, or where
you come from. That is what we believe.
That's what makes us strong.
And
our enduring strength is also reflected in our respect for an
international system that protects the rights of both nations and
people -- a United Nations and a
Universal Declaration of Human Rights; international law and the means
to enforce those laws. But
we also know that those rules are not self-executing; they depend on
people and nations of goodwill continually affirming them. And that's
why Russia's
violation of international law -- its assault on Ukraine's
sovereignty and territorial integrity -- must be met with condemnation.
Not because we're trying
to keep Russia down, but because the principles that have meant so much
to Europe and the world must be lifted up.
Over the last several days, the United
States, Europe, and our partners around the world have been united in
defense of these ideals, and
united in support of the Ukrainian
people. Together,
we've condemned Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and rejected the
legitimacy of the
Crimean
referendum. Together, we have isolated Russia politically,
suspending it from the G8 nations and downgrading our bilateral ties.
Together, we are imposing costs through
sanctions that have left a mark on Russia and those accountable for its
actions.
And
if the
Russian
leadership stays on its current course, together we will ensure that
this isolation deepens. Sanctions will expand. And the toll on
Russia's economy, as well as its standing in the world, will only
increase.
And meanwhile, the United States and
our allies will continue to support the government of Ukraine as they
chart a democratic course
Together, we
are going to provide a significant package of assistance that can help
stabilize the Ukrainian economy, and meet the basic needs
of the people. Make no mistake: Neither the United
States, nor Europe has any interest in controlling Ukraine. We
have sent no troops there. What we
want is for the Ukrainian people to make their own decisions, just like
other free people around the world.
Understand, as well, this is not
another Cold War that we're entering into. After all, unlike the Soviet
Union, Russia leads no bloc of
nations, no global ideology. The United
States and NATO do not seek any conflict with Russia. In fact, for more
than 60 years, we have
come together in NATO -- not to claim
other lands, but to keep nations free. What we will do -- always -- is
uphold our solemn
obligation, our Article 5 duty to
defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of our allies. And
in that promise we will never
waver;
NATO nations never stand alone.
Today,
NATO planes patrol the skies over the Baltics, and we've reinforced our
presence in Poland. And we're prepared to do more. Going forward,
every NATO member state must step up and carry its share of the burden
by showing the political will to invest in our collective defense,
and by developing the capabilities to serve as a source of
international peace and security.
Of
course, Ukraine is not a member of NATO -- in part because of its close
and complex history with Russia. Nor will Russia be
dislodged from Crimea or deterred from further escalation by military
force. But with time, so long as we remain united, the Russian people
will recognize that they cannot achieve
security, prosperity and the status that they seek through brute force.
And that's why, throughout this crisis, we
will combine our substantial pressure on Russia with an open door for
diplomacy. I
believe that for both Ukraine and Russia, a stable peace will come
through de-escalation -- direct dialogue between Russia and the
government of Ukraine and the international community; monitors who
can ensure that the rights of all Ukrainians are protected; a process
of constitutional reform within Ukraine; and free and fair
elections this spring.
So far, Russia has resisted diplomatic
overtures, annexing Crimea and massing large forces along Ukraine's
border. Russia
has justified
<>these
actions as an effort to prevent problems on its own borders and to
protect ethnic Russians inside Ukraine. Of course, there is no evidence,
and never has been, of systemic violence against ethnic Russians inside
of Ukraine.
Moreover, many countries around the world face similar questions about
their borders and ethnic minorities abroad, about sovereignty and
self-determination. These are tensions that have led in other places to
debate
and democratic referendums, conflicts and uneasy co-existence. These
are difficult issues, and it is precisely because these questions
are hard that they must be addressed through constitutional means and
international laws so that majorities cannot simply suppress
minorities, and big countries cannot simply bully the small.
In
defending its actions, Russian leaders have further claimed Kosovo as a
precedent -- an example they say of the West
interfering in
the affairs of a smaller country, just
as they're doing now. But NATO only intervened after the people of
Kosovo were systematically
brutalized and killed for years. And
Kosovo only left Serbia after a referendum was organized not outside
the boundaries of international
law, but in careful cooperation with
the United Nations and with Kosovo's neighbors. None of that even came
close to happening in Crimea.
Moreover, Russia
has pointed to America's
decision to go into Iraq as an example of Western hypocrisy.
Now, it is true that the Iraq War was a subject of vigorous debate not
just around the world, but in the United States as well. I participated
in that debate and I opposed our military intervention there. But
even in Iraq, America sought to work within the international system.
We did not claim or annex Iraq's territory. We did not grab its
resources for our own gain. Instead, we ended our war and left Iraq to
its people and a fully sovereign Iraqi state that could make
decisions about its own future.
Of
course, neither the United States nor Europe are perfect in adherence
to our ideals, nor do we claim to be the sole arbiter of what is right
or wrong in the world. We are human, after all, and we face difficult
choices about how to exercise our power. But part of what makes
us different is that we welcome criticism, just as we welcome the
responsibilities that come with global leadership.
We look to the East and the South and
see nations poised to play a growing role on the world stage, and we
consider that a good thing. It
reflects the same diversity that makes
us stronger as a nation and the forces of integration and cooperation
that Europe has advanced for
decades. And in a world of challenges
that are increasingly global, all of us have an interest in nations
stepping forward to play their
part -- to bear their share of the
burden and to uphold international norms.
So
our approach stands in stark contrast to the arguments coming out of
Russia these days. It is absurd to suggest -- as a steady
drumbeat
of Russian voices do -- that America is somehow conspiring with
fascists inside of Ukraine or failing to respect the Russian
people. My grandfather served in
Patton's Army, just as many of your fathers and grandfathers fought
against fascism. We Americans
remember well the unimaginable
sacrifices made by the Russian people in World War II, and we have
honored those sacrifices.
Since the end of the Cold War, we have
worked with Russia under successive administrations to build ties of
culture and commerce and
international community not as a favor
to Russia, but because it was in our national interests. And together,
we've secured nuclear
materials from terrorists. We welcomed
Russia into the G8 and the World Trade Organization. From the reduction
of nuclear arms to the
elimination of Syria's chemical
weapons, we believe the world has benefited when Russia chooses to
cooperate on the basis of mutual
interests and mutual respect.
So America, and the world and Europe,
has an interest in a strong and responsible Russia, not a weak one. We
want the Russian people to
live in security,
prosperity and dignity like everyone else -- proud of their own
history. But that does not mean that Russia can run
roughshod over its neighbors. Just
because Russia has a deep history with Ukraine does not mean it should
be able to dictate Ukraine's
future. No amount of propaganda can
make right something that the world knows is wrong.
In the end, every society must
chart its own course. America's path or Europe's path is not the only
ways to reach freedom and justice.
But on the fundamental principle that
is at stake here -- the ability of nations and peoples to make their
own choices -- there can be no
going back. It's not America that
filled the Maidan with protesters -- it was Ukrainians. No foreign
forces compelled the citizens of
Tunis and Tripoli to rise up -- they
did so on their own. From the Burmese parliamentarian pursuing reform
to the young leaders fighting
corruption and intolerance in Africa,
we see something irreducible that all of us share as human beings -- a
truth that will persevere in
the face of violence and repression and
will ultimately overcome.
For the young people here today, I know
it may seem easy to see these events as removed from our lives, remote
from our daily routines,
distant from concerns closer to home. I
recognize that both in the United States and in much of Europe there's
more than enough to worry
about in the affairs of our own
countries. There
will always be voices who say that what happens in the wider world is
not our concern, nor
our responsibility. But we must never forget that we
are heirs to a struggle for freedom. Our democracy, our individual
opportunity only exists because those who came before us had the wisdom
and the courage to recognize that our ideals will only endure if we see
our self-interest in the success of other peoples and other nations.
Now
is not the time for bluster. The situation in Ukraine, like crises in
many parts of the world, does not have easy answers nor a
military
solution. But at this moment, we must meet the challenge to our ideals
-- to our very international order -- with strength and conviction.
And it is you, the young people of
Europe, young people like Laura, who will help decide which way the
currents of our history will flow.
Do not think for a moment that your own
freedom, your own prosperity, that your own moral imagination is bound
by the limits of your
community, your ethnicity, or even your
country. You're bigger than that. You can help us to choose a better
history. That's what Europe
tells us. That's what the American
experience is all about.
I say this as the President of a
country that looked to Europe for the values that are written into our
founding documents, and which
spilled blood to ensure that those
values could endure on these shores. I also say this as the son of a
Kenyan whose grandfather was a
cook for the British, and as a person
who once lived in Indonesia as it emerged from colonialism. The ideals
that unite us matter equally
to the young people of Boston or
Brussels, or Jakarta or Nairobi, or Krakow or Kyiv.
In the end, the success of our ideals
comes down to us -- including the example of our own lives, our own
societies. We know that there
will always be intolerance. But instead
of fearing the immigrant, we can welcome him. We
can insist on policies that benefit the many,
not just the
few; that an age of globalization and dizzying
change opens the door of opportunity to the marginalized, and not just a
privileged few. Instead of targeting
our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters, we can use our laws to
protect their rights. Instead of
defining ourselves in opposition to
others, we can affirm the aspirations that we hold in common. That's
what will make America strong.
That's what will make Europe strong.
That's what makes us who we are.
And
just as we meet our responsibilities as individuals, we must be
prepared to meet them as nations.
Because we live in a world in which our ideals are going to be
challenged again and again by forces that would drag us back into
conflict or corruption. We can't count on
others to rise to meet those tests. The
policies of your government, the principles of your European Union,
will make a critical
difference in whether or not the international
order that so many generations before you have strived to create
continues to move
forward, or whether it retreats.
And
that's the question we all must answer -- what kind of Europe, what
kind of America, what kind of world will we leave behind. And I believe
that if we hold firm to our principles, and are willing to back our
beliefs with courage and resolve, then hope will ultimately overcome
fear, and freedom will continue to triumph over tyranny -- because that
is what forever stirs in the human heart.
Thank you very much. (Applause.)
END 6:52 P.M. CET
Source