CONTENTS
August 23
August 14
August 9
What
kind of protection do the Covid injections provide?
According to German microbiologist Dr.
Sucharit Bhakdi: (1)(2)
They
[the Covid injections] showed absolutely zero [benefit in the clinical
trials],” he says. “This is the ridiculousness. People don't understand
that they're being fooled and have been fooled all along. Let's take
the one of these Pfizer trials: 20,000 healthy people were vaccinated
and another 20,000 people were not vaccinated.
And then they observed, over a period
of 12 weeks or so, how many cases they found in the vaccinated group
and how many cases they found the non-vaccinated. What they found was
that less than 1% of the vaccinated group got COVID-19 and less than 1%
in the non-vaccinated group also got COVID-19.
The difference was 0.8 to 0.1%, which
is nothing, considering the fact that they were not even looking at
severe cases. They were looking at people with a positive PCR test -
which as we all now know is worthless - plus one symptom, which could
be cough or fever.
That is not a severe case of
COVID-19. Any vaccination that is going to get authorized must be shown
to protect against severe illness and death, and this has definitely
not been shown. So, forget authorization. It can't be authorized, not
by any normal means.
Now [the COVID injections do not
have] full authorization, it's an emergency authorization, which again
is absolute bullshit, since we know the infection fatality rate of this
disease or virus is not greater than that of seasonal flu. John
Ioannidis has published these numbers, which have never been contested
by anyone in the world and cannot be contested.
If you are under 70 years of age and
have no severe preexisting illness, you can hardly die [from SARS-CoV-2
infection]. So, there is no fatality rate that can be reduced.
Dr. Joseph Mercola comments on the
words of Dr. Bhakdi: (1)
While the COVID injections have been
characterized as being somewhere around 95% effective against
SARS-CoV-2 infection, this claim is the product of statistical
obfuscation. In short, they’ve conflated relative risk reduction and
absolute risk reduction. The absolute risk reduction is actually right
around 1% for all currently available COVID shots.
..... In a July 1, 2021, commentary in The Lancet Microbe,3 Piero
Olliaro, Els Torreele and Michel Vaillant also argue for the use of
absolute risk reduction when discussing vaccine efficacy with the
public. They too went through the calculations, coming up with the
following:
* Pfizer/BioNTech - Relative risk
reduction: 95%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.84%
* Moderna - Relative risk reduction: 94%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
* Gamaleya (Sputnic V) - Relative risk reduction: 91%. Absolute risk
reduction: 0.93%
* Johnson & Johnson - Relative risk reduction: 67%. Absolute risk
reduction: 1.2%
* AstraZeneca/Oxford - Relative risk reduction: 67%. Absolute risk
reduction: 1.3%
..... Aside from providing
insignificant protection in terms of your absolute risk reduction, it’s
important to realize that they do not provide immunity. All they can do
is reduce the severity of the symptoms of infection. According to
Bhakdi, they fail even at this.
And for people who are elderly and have preexisting illness, as we know
from Dr. Peter McCullough and his colleagues' work, there are very good
means and medicines to treat this virus so that the fatality rates go
down another 70 to 80%, which means there is no ground for emergency
use whatsoever.
..... I [Dr. Mercola] neglected to follow-up on his [Dr. Bhakdi's]
comment about 40,000 people being
equally divided between the injection and no injection groups in the
COVID injection trials. A few months ago, they actually abandoned the
non-injection arm of the trial, so no there is no control group anymore.
The justification was that the injection was too important to deny it
to the control group. It’s just another sneaky way to skirt around
reporting all the adverse effects occurring in the injection group.
That said, it’s worth repeating that the FDA can only grant emergency
use authorization for a pandemic drug or vaccine if there’s no safe and
effective preexisting treatment or alternative. Since there are several
such alternatives, the FDA is legally required to revoke the emergency
authorization for these shots.
(1) Source,
22-Aug-2021
(2) Bhakdi's Medical
Credentials (quoting from the Source 1):
Bhakdi graduated from medical
school in Germany in 1970. After a year of clinical work, he joined the
Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology, where he remained for four years
as a post-doc. || There, he also began researching immunology.
Eventually, he ended up chairing the department of medical,
microbiology and hygiene at the University of Mainz, where he worked
for 22 years until his retirement nine years ago. During that time,
Bhakdi also worked on vaccine development, and says he’s “certainly
pro-vax with regards to the vaccinations that work and that are
meaningful.
To
Vaccinate
or Not to Vaccinate for Covid - A Clarification of Our Position
The Coronavirus Crisis (1)
and the Universal Vaccination Campaign (2) fit
perfectly with the purpose of very quickly and covertly carrying out
the final steps of the One World Order agenda (3) that has been scripted
decades in advance (4).
The terrifying progression of the coercion on "vaccines" (5) to be the requirement
without which no one can "buy or sell" (6) is the greatest
confirmation of this.
The indoctrination and state of denial (7) of many is so
persistent,
despite the fact that the lies and incoherence of the official
narrative are so great, that they would follow everything the
authorities propose to them even if they were required to be literally
branded with the
number 666 on their hand and on their forehead with a big flashing
luminous sign (8).
In this context, when we talk about technical aspects about the
devices they call Covid "vaccines" - for example, if we compare natural
immunity with the alleged immunity from the "vaccines", or if we claim
that they are experimental (9)
- it is not
because we are considering the possibility of Covid "vaccination" as
worthy
of evaluation in case they were not experimental. It is because we want
to illustrate the lies and
inconsistencies that make the official narrative not credible.
Put another way: Even if it were demonstrated, and we were convinced,
that
the devices they call Covid "vaccines" cured the disease and did so
with no
harmful side effects, there would
remain the problem that, clearly, curing the disease is the bait
because those devices are designed for another purpose - that of being
population control tools (10)
- and we would still reject them (and the invasive tests designed for
the same purpose).
If we expose the lies and contradictions of the Covid "vaccination"
campaign,
it is not to compare the advantages and disadvantages of being
"vaccinated" or not. It is with the intention that those who have "eyes
to see" see and understand the ultimate purpose of the plans while
there is still time. If one believes that this ultimate purpose for
Covid "vaccines" is real and not a fiction, one will not want to be
Covid-"vaccinated" in any way.
Even so, we know this is hard to digest, and we understand that
describing the problem as if we were comparing the advantages and
disadvantages of being Covid-"vaccinated" or not may be useful to some
people
to buy time while they digest the terrible reality of the whole
picture. Time is already short, however (11).
(1) The Coronavirus
Global
Scam that is being staged by the World Masters - Index of Documents
(2) The Universal Vaccination
Campaign:
(3) The
attempt to establish a New World Order - The sequence of events leading
to it
(4) The
Totalitarian Plan for a World
Dictatorship, confirmed since 1969
(5) Non-mandatory
vaccination? A
false promise already broken
(6) That is, neither
travel, nor work, nor receive medical care, nor enjoy social rights
paid for with one's own taxes... more and more restrictions until they
become the equivalent, symbolic or literal, of not
being able to buy or
sell.
(7) The
state of denial and its grave consequences
(8) About the
spiritual harm
associated to Covid-19 "vaccination"
(9) The
Covid-19 "vaccines", a big
experiment with the world population
(10) Control of the population,
both in one
sense
and in
another
(11) The
Apocalypse... Are We There Yet?
The
meaning of "Turn to them the other cheek"
FROM OUR FILES: July 30th,
2019
From miguel de Portugal
Let us examine a Gospel reading which is ignored from the pulpit and,
logically, by the faithful while it harms the faith subconsciously:
From the NIV Bible
You
have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth. But I
tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the
right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to
sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone
forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. [Matthew
5:38-41]
The reason that it is ignored is because it appears that Jesus is
telling us to submit to evil. As a matter of fact, it appears that He
is telling us to cooperate with evil, i.e. but if one strike thee on thy right
cheek, turn to him also the other, etc.
Having attended public daily
Masses from 1985 through 1998 [= 4,745 Masses] I have never heard an
"Evangelizer" place the above message in perspective. Through the Grace
of God
we will do so for those who read our pages. To do so let us review
other Gospel readings:
From the NIV Bible
If
anyone causes one of these little ones - those who believe in me - to
stumble, it would be better for them if a large millstone were hung
around their neck and they were thrown into the sea. If your hand
causes you to stumble, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life
maimed than with two hands to go into hell, where the fire never goes
out.
[Mark 9:42-44]
From the second set of readings it is obvious that Jesus is not
proposing to have our hands and feet cut off if one has the tendency to
sin using/because of any one of them. Being that the only one who
could ever cast the first stone [John 8:7] is the Virgin Mary, we are
all sinners, then, if those
requirements were followed literally, the
Christian world would be full of humans without hands and feet.
Now, referring back to the initial Gospel readings which we attempting
to clarify for the faithful....
What Jesus is telling us through Matthew 5:38-41 is precisely that: We
are not to counter an evil act, with another evil act. What we
are to do
is what Jesus said elsewhere:
But I
say to you, Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray
for them that persecute and calumniate you: That you may be the
children of your Father who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise
upon the good, and bad, and raineth upon the just and the unjust.
For if you love them that love you,
what reward shall you have? do not even the publicans this? [47] And if
you salute your brethren only, what do you more? do not also the
heathens this? Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father
is perfect. [Matthew 5:44-48]
We pray that this apparent incoherence has become clear to all
Christians who read our pages worldwide.
Back
to Index
Digital
tracking of people under the pretext of fighting Covid-19
From RS:
A. Thank you for pointing out
to us the existence of that bill, which we did not remember.
That bill, from May 2020, was not finally approved but, indeed,
illustrates very well the intentions for tracking and monitoring all
the people under the cover of fighting the Coronavirus - a plan which
that bill intended to fund generously in USA and which, anyway, is
being advanced worldwide as fast as the people accepts the needed
indoctrination.
A little research/reading provides us with the basic details. In May
2020, in the U.S. Congress, the bill H.R.
6666 - "COVID-19 Testing,
Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act" (1) - was proposed to
fund $100 billion to track the entire population of USA as it relates
to Covid-19 testing, the "infected," their contacts, and house arrest
("quarantine") of contacts, as well as "for other purposes".
The bill was widely
protested by the public and by many media (2) and did not become law,
but this only blocked a
very favorable avenue for financing, not the plan as a whole. The get
an idea of what such amount means: One hundred billion dollars is the
size of New Jersey and Illinois' entire state budgets, combined (3). $100 billion in funding
would be for Fiscal Year 2020 and "such
sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal year 2021 and any
subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues"
(1).
It is very interesting how God allowed this
bill to receive the number 6666, as a hint for those with open eyes:
it is the biblical number 666, whose biblical meaning we already know (4), and an additional 6 to underscore it.
Plus, let us remember the hint of the word "Covid": Cov(ert) ID.
If anyone wants to get an idea of the current
situation regarding digital monitoring of people with the pretext of
the Coronavirus, you can take a look at this document: "COVID-19
Digital Rights Tracker", which collects data from around the world
on digital tracking for Covid-19. (5)
(1) The
bill H.R.
6666 - "COVID-19 Testing,
Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act"
(2) An
example of a call to take action and stop the bill
(3) Source
(4) Revelation
13:16-18, "And he shall make all,
both little and great, rich and poor, freemen and bondmen, to have a
character in their right hand, or on their foreheads. And that no man
might buy or sell, but he that hath the character, or the name of the
beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. He that hath
understanding, let him count the number of the beast. For it is the
number of a man: and the number of him is six hundred
sixty-six." || Is the "Live Saving" Vaccine the Mark
of the Beast?
(5) The multiple
solutions and "apps" that exist for monitoring should not distract us
from the fact that, in the end, only "the solution" that they have
prescribed in
advance will be allowed to succeed.
Caiphas,
Annas - Francis and Benedict XVI
Did you know that...?
At Jesus' First Coming there were, technically, two high priests:
Caiphas, who held the office nominally, and his father-in-law Annas,
who had previously been high priest and was still a very influential
person (1).
Using today's language, one would say that Annas was the "high priest
emeritus".
As we know from the Gospel accounts, although Caiphas was the nominal
high priest, the influence of Annas over him and the Sanhedrin was so
great that Jesus, after being taken prisoner, was sent first to Annas, and only
later to Caiphas (2).
Now, two thousand years later, we have, technically, two "supreme
pontiffs" as the visible head of the Temple Masters of today: Francis,
who holds the office nominally, and the "Pope Emeritus"
Benedict XVI, who has not ceased to have influence over Francis and the
Vatican despite resigning from office, an influence demonstrated by the
fact that he has not retired
to live outside the Vatican.
The parallel could not be more exact.
(1) So influential, up
to the point of still being named "high priest", as we read in Luke
3:2: "Under the high priests Annas and
Caiphas; the word of the Lord was made unto John, the son of
Zachary, in the desert."
(2) John 18:12-13: "Then the band and the tribune, and the
servants of the Jews, took Jesus, and bound him. And they led him away to Annas first,
for he was father in law to Caiphas, who was the high priest of that
year."
"You
shall not Kill" or "You shall not Murder"?
FROM OUR FILES: October
21st, 2006 - Feast of
Mary's Visitation
From WMP @ USA
Q. In reading your answer to one of the questions, you stated that God
said "Thou shalt not Kill" ( obviously from the 10 commandments) and
that "He gave no exceptions whatsoever."
My question: I have heard it stated many times on the radio from
some very knowledgeable Jewish talk show hosts that the word
"KILL" was mistranslated and should have been MURDER. "Thou shalt not
murder." This can't be true from your answer to JL (1).
The radio hosts' argument seems very strong on the face of it, because
if someone is going to try to harm me or my family or I have to go to
war, I will do whatever is necessary to kill or be killed.
God has instilled a very strong will to survive in everyone. What do I
or anyone of our fighting men do in this situation?
Thank you for this wonderful eye and ear opening site.
May God continue to bless you.
WMP
A. Your kind words Glorify God.
Unfortunately, man is the "Master of Spinning the Facts" and, when it
comes to circumventing the Laws of God, he shines brightly.
To kill, to murder, to commit a homicide [1st degree or 2nd degree],
euthanasia, abortion, ad infinitum means only one thing: Taking an
action which will cause/force the separation of the soul from the body;
i.e. cause physical death.
The Roman Catholic Church defends "Just Wars" because they have to
justify the atrocities they committed. The Jews and Muslims will
Spin the Law their way for similar reasons, but, did you notice that
when God freed His people from Egypt He reserved [for Him alone] the
right to take away
the life of Egyptians? Did you notice that Jesus could have led a
most effective revolt against Rome and free His people from their yoke
yet He did not?
It seems that as the Old Testament progressed, the Spin Masters started
to justify anything and everything they needed to further their
temporal agendas. Note that we do not find wanton killing in the
New Testament. This is because its "writing period" was very
short in comparison with the Old Testament. But not to worry -
Rome took care of that by assuming Divine Powers and killing at will to
further their very temporal agendas.
God IS the Master of Life and Death and woe to those who dare to assume
such role.
About self defense? About war? Did not Jesus say through Luke 12:
6 Are not five sparrows sold for two farthings, and not one of them is
forgotten before God? 7 Yea, the very hairs of your head are all
numbered. Fear not therefore: you are of more value than many sparrows.
8 And I say to you, Whosoever shall confess me before men, him shall
the Son of man also confess before the angels of God. 9 But he that
shall deny me before men, shall be denied before the angels of God.
and through Luke 12:
16 And you shall be betrayed by your parents and brethren, and kinsmen
and friends; and some of you they will put to death. 17 And you shall
be hated by all men for my name's sake. 18 But a hair of your head
shall not perish. 19 In your patience you shall possess your
souls.
The issue rests upon our level of Faith. For the wonderful things that
Jesus spoke about to take place in our lives, we must believe. This is
what Faith is all about (2).
This is why it is so important to pray
for Faith since only God can
give it. Most of the "Faith" we see
around us is "intellectual faith" which will vanish at the first blow -
just wait and see.
That we are "talking through our hat" (3)? Miguel's life (4) has been attempted
against many times and the attempts will continue to fail until his
appointed time comes. What security measures does he use? Simple
common sense and "a very open ear to God" to make sure that he takes
whatever evasive action God determines he must take in a particular
case. In others - he knows nothing until after the attempt has
taken place and God handled it without m de P's action. That this
sounds unbelievable? Well, doesn't the resurrection of a dead body
sound unbelievable too? It is just a matter of Faith and the
"Power it packs."
What about those who go to war? "Father, forgive them for they do not
know what they do." because we assure you, if a human being knew how
serious it is to take someone's life, he/she would prefer to die in the
other one's place. This is how bad we know (not believe, but
know) it is.
For more on Biblical Writings you may wish to review our documents
Biblical Literalism (5).
(1) The Public Forum of The M+G+R Foundation, September 2006
(See September 1st)
(2) The Foundation of Faith
(3) "Talking
through our hat": To be talking about a subject as if you know a
lot about it when in fact you know very little.
(4) Who is
miguel de Portugal
(5) Biblical Literalism - Part 1 and Part 2
Back
to Index
Are
unvaccinated getting sick being around the Covid-vaccinated?
From IW: (1)
I
seem to be having a reaction, [a light and temporary ailment,] after I
have been around a vaccinated person [a member of my family] for a
period of time, where we
have talked, mask less, and maybe even given each other a hug. After
visiting him for breakfast, I was kind of dizzy / off balance. Just not
feeling myself. Then, [after some activity outside] I was just tired
and
wanted to rest. I am not sure what happened.
I felt better the next morning.
This has happened before, and I just
ignored it, but after reading the
articles about vaccinated people making unvaccinated people sick, I
reconsidered why I might have not been feeling well.
Most do not want to go back to
wearing masks, but if by breathing the
vaccinated are infecting the unvaccinated, that is a whole new ball
game.
Any words or insight would be greatly
appreciated.
IW (Initials Withheld)
Response (by Ricardo de Valencia):
Exposure to people injected with the Covid experimental vaccines (2) is
causing effects on the health of some "unvaccinated" people. This is a fact already confirmed by
some doctors (who have eyes to see and the courage to speak) (3) and
attested by many people (4).
What is not yet clear is whether this phenomenon can be properly
described as a viral infection.
And this could be an important clue to the true nature of Covid-19.
Let's take a look to the following case described by a doctor (who is
suffering
in first person the symptoms she describes):
I’ve
had the same dizziness and
nausea every time I’m around a vaccinated person. It started in January
when my aunt who was vaccinated visited the same day. I got a full body
rash & severe body aches for days after consoling her while she
cried after my uncle died (not vaccine related). I’ve also had
irregular periods since then. The first one was for almost two weeks
then I got two periods a month for two months. It’s so unbearable that
I ask everyone the vaccine status before seeing them. I’ve begun to
feel like a metal (vaccinated) detector. I’m also nursing a toddler
& did throughout the ordeal. He developed a minor cold like illness
with no fever & an unproductive cough; general malaise. I really
hope the real science gets done & there are no lasting effects for
myself or by young son. I am also trying for another baby. (5)
In this case (as in your case, if the proximity to the "vaccinated" is
confirmed to be the cause of your temporary ailment), the way in which
this phenomenon
develops does not fit with a viral infection/contagion. It would be
better
explained if what we are seeing is some kind of re-initiated
intoxication every
time one approaches the injected ("vaccinated").
Think about this: If you get - let's say - measles for being in
contact with a person who
is sick of measles, you don't get the disease or the symptoms over and
over again every time you visit
him/her. You get it once
and suffer the disease once.
That's how a viral infection works.
Some kind of poisoning/intoxication
could be one possible
explanation for the repeated cycles of getting
sick, getting well, when visiting the vaccinee. Your body is able to
get rid of the supposed
bio-chemical toxin until your body is exposed again to the "source".
Also, if the impact from certain forms of electromagnetic radiation are
involved in
such transient effects/symptoms or apparent "contagion", the
explanation would be more complicated
but worth
considering (let us not forget that, in some "vaccinated" people,
magnets are able
to get stuck on the arm in the zone of the injection - this is not a fantasy (6)).
Many people are identifying the "spike proteins" (the
key molecules whose production in the body is triggered by the
injection and which mimic similar molecules of the alleged virus) as
the
hypothetical "toxin" we are talking about. A heated debate is taking
place as to whether or not injected ("vaccinated") persons can shed the spike proteins.
Mainstream "fact checkers" are misdirecting attention by focusing on
the claim that vaccines are
not shed or that viruses are
not shed as a result from the injection, but that does not rule out
that the spike proteins can
be shed by injected ("vaccinated") people. (7)
One step further, some mainstream "fact checkers" try to dismount the
allegations
saying that the spike proteins are short living (about two weeks). It
may be so, but that does not prevent the fact that the injections
(experimental vaccines) convert the body in a factory of spike
proteins. Some experts have already alerted that whether or when this
"factory" is switched off is not something we can take for granted (8).
Anyway, as a first step on this discussion, what we must not forget is
that, whatever the cause or
mechanism involved is, it is a verified fact that exposure to people
injected with the Covid experimental vaccines is causing effects on the
health of some "unvaccinated" people (3)(4)(5)(7).
If/as God allows, we will continue to write on this
topic in the next For Your
Information and Reference, as there is much information to
process.
(1) Testimony partially
abbreviated for simplicity and to preserve privacy
(2) The
Covid-19 "vaccines", a big
experiment with the world population. The CDC
refers to the injections as "candidate vaccines" in their
official documentation.
This fact alone is enough to qualify those biological agents as
experimental, not even proven to be real vaccines (still
"candidates"). For that matter, and for the many doubts involved, we
tend to write the words "vaccine",
"vaccinated" and "unvaccinated" between quotes.
(3) In
a roundtable discussion in April 2021, five well-known doctors analyzed
this phenomenon
(Video, 1 hour, 20 min.; published 22-Apr-2021; Dr. Sherri Tenpenny,
Dr.
Larry Pavlovksy, Dr. Carrie Madej, Dr. Christiane Northrup and Dr. Lee
Merritt)
(4) Montana Daily Gazette: Testimonies
reporting negative reaction to the experimental mRNA vaccines - even if
they are unvaccinated (dated 16-Apr-2021)
(5) Dr.
Rachel Leigh Bell in a forum in the website Medscape (as reported
by Health Impact News, 11-Jun-2021)
(6) In some "vaccinated"
people, magnets are able to get stuck on the arm in the zone of the
injection:
(a)
The
Freedom Articles (12-May-2021): "A
number of people are reporting, with video proof, that when they apply
a small magnet to their injection site (usually the upper arm), right
where they got injected with the Covid non-vaccine (which is a
gene-altering device and not a real vaccine), the magnet is sticking!"
(b) Study
on the electromagnetism of vaccinated persons in Luxembourg (6-Jun-2021),
"Conclusion:
It was found that vaccinated individuals do give off an electromagnetic
field and that the earlier the individuals were vaccinated, the
stronger the field they gave off. ... Individuals are interested in the
experiment out of curiosity and then when they see that the magnet
clings onto their skin, they become dubious at first, then they
suddenly become cold. Some of them even become extremely nervous, even
completely shocked."
(7) America's Frontline
Doctors: "Patients
who are vaccinated can shed some of these (spike protein) particles to
close contacts" (dated 4-Apr-2021)
Can the unvaccinated
get sick from contact with the vaccinated?
The vaccine produces many trillions
of particles of spike proteins in the recipient. Patients who are
vaccinated can shed some of these (spike protein) particles to close
contacts. The particles have the ability to create inflammation and
disease in these contacts. In other words, the spike proteins are
pathogenic (“disease causing”) just like the full virus. What is most
worrisome is that a person’s body is being suddenly flooded with 13
trillion of these particles and the spike proteins bind more tightly
than the fully intact virus. Because of the biomimicry (similarity) on
the spike, shedding appears to be causing wide variety of autoimmune
disease (where the body attacks its own tissue) in some persons.
Worldwide cases of pericarditis, shingles, pneumonia, blood clots in
the extremities and brain, Bell’s Palsy, vaginal bleeding and
miscarriages have been reported in persons who are near persons who
have been vaccinated. In addition, we know the spike proteins can cross
the blood brain barrier, unlike traditional vaccines.
(8) Dr. Larry pavlovsky in the
above referred
video (Note 3), minute 36:20, "We
[the humanity] have no experience using and injecting synthetic
messenger ARN genetic
instructions as to whether or not our body is going to turn it on or
turn it off as we start the factory of making the spike protein. And,
so, there is no evidence, zero evidence, no scientific studies, as to
whether or not that spike proteins turns on and stays on, or ever turns
off."
In
memory of miguel de Portugal, who crossed the veil on August 9th, 2020
FROM OUR FILES: March
19th, 2010 - Feast of
St. Joseph and 25th Anniversary of the Conversion of miguel
de Portugal
From miguel de Portugal @ European Union and USA
It was on March 19th, 25 years ago, that I decided to seek supernatural
(occult) assistance to lead a life that would have led my soul to
perdition. Since all else had failed, the occult seemed to be the sure
choice left.
It was literally then
and there that God intervened
in a manner that would change the course
of my life and history. In one instantaneous flash – lacking a better
adjective – I came to know God and His reality, and understood that my
only purpose in life was to serve Him. All else – all that I had held
dear my entire life - became unimportant and superfluous.
My journey (1)
then commenced. The prescription drugs and social alcohol
which were, an ample part of my diet (as they were, and still are, for
more Americans than want to admit it), somehow, within weeks, were no
longer
necessary. Jesus and Mary became my Spiritual Directors (a functional
title I did not even know then). They took me by the hand and we
started, together, the walk Home.
Yes, I was a cradle Catholic. Nonetheless, in spite of having a
Cardinal Patriarch as a great-uncle and a truly devoted grandmother, I
took the usual path: From the
cradle to the Baptismal font; from the font to one year of catechism in
a religious
school and on to my First Communion.... then, out the door! Of course,
my
immediate family kept what people call "the tradition." They went to
Church for the baptism, wedding or funeral of a relative or a
business/social contact driven by "practical piety": What will people say if
we do not go.
On spiritual matters, twenty-five years ago I was starting from
practically zero.
I read and studied every imaginable book – good, bad and indifferent –
covering spiritual matters that I could get my hands on. I became
familiar with the workings and beliefs of many faiths (and
anti-faiths), and timidly
started praying. Eventually, I started attending an occasional Sunday
Mass.
These visits became more regular as I drank from the Living Waters.
After reading thousands of pages of spiritual related texts, the Holy
Bible included, I came to the realization that the Catholic Faith
had, in its spiritual treasury, the greatest amount of revealed Truths.
As I realized this, I began to daily attend the Holy
Mass, and often sought the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Soon, I began
to offer the prayers of the Holy Rosary and the Via Crucis, and offered
Adoration of the REAL Presence of Jesus Christ in the consecrated host.
All of this took place in spite of, and not because of:
(a) My "Catholic friends"
of my BC (Before Christ) life who "adored" me when I was the acting
"King of the Pagans" (2);
(b) The false piety I found amongst the "Churchy" Catholics
and other Christians; and, above all, in spite of....
(c) The clergy I encountered in the initial period of my
"Christianization"... and thereafter!
Believe me, I could write a best seller book with the title:
"The Sights and Scenes of My Journey
- For Mature Audiences Only".
This is why I insist at every opportunity on making clear the
separation between the Catholic "Faith" and the "Administration" of the
Catholic Church. Just as Jesus said almost 2,000 years ago, today's
Administrators
....go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when
he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than
yourselves. [Matthew
23:15]
If I had not met God directly, the experiences that I have had with
far too many Catholics in the past 25 years would have rendered me as
anti-Catholic
as Saul (the future Paul) was anti-Christian. (This negative assessment
applies, in particular, to the Catholic clergy) Had I not learned from
God that the Catholic Faith contains more spiritual truth than any
other, I would have declared myself an atheist (or chosen any other
religion) rather than align myself with the Roman Catholic Faith.
Many have come back to the fold when they realize that there is indeed
a difference between the Catholic Faith and the Administration of the
Catholic Church.
As I now look back on those 25 years, I still have two overwhelming
desires:
(1) Expressing my immense
gratitude to God and our True Mother, Mary, through serving Them as He
Wills it, and
(2) To be able to transmit to every single human being the
reality of God, His Mercy and His Love.
These desires are like an
inextinguishable fire burning in my heart.
Thank you for allowing me
to share this joy with each and every one of
you on this very special day. May it help you in your Journey Home.
(1)
In retrospect, said journey started before my birth in Time but I was
oblivious to it.
(2) My favorite phrase in those
days was one ascribed to Marie Antoinette, wife of Louis XVI, when she
was told that the poor of Paris did not even have bread to eat.
Allegedly she said: Let them eat cake!
Back
to Index
© Copyright 2021 - 2022 by The M+G+R Foundation.
All rights reserved. However, you may
freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as: (1)
Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are made
in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made
for it.
The M+G+R Foundation
Please Note: If the above dated image does not appear
on this document, it means that you are not viewing the original
document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.