pseudo-Vaccine has 1,291 Side Effects
A judge forced the FDA to release Pfizer's clinical data and it's worse
than you can possibly imagine: (1)
FDA was forced by a judge to release clinical data on the COVID
vaccines back in January and so 55,000 pages of documents were just
released. The FDA had
originally wanted to hide the data for 75 years and release it
in 2096 because, of course, the FDA is basically engaged in a criminal
Hiding out in one appendix is the
clinical data for Pfizer’s vaccine (2) – which lists 1,291 adverse side effects
in alphabetical order.
You already know that children,
especially young boys, can get myocarditis from the vaccines but you
should add to that list the serious possibility of them getting: a
brain stem embolism, acute kidney injury, cardiac failure, frontal lobe
epilepsy, Hashimoto's encephalopathy, herpes, interstitial lung
disease, or Type 1 diabetes mellitus – just to pick a few very serious
side effects from a very sobering list.
The U.S. government’s own database,
the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), has over 1 million
reports of “adverse events” to the new vaccines – with 24,000 events
listed as “death.” Pfizer
was aware of more than 158,000 “adverse events” when they asked for
approval from the FDA. People had serious issues after taking
the Pfizer vaccine and Pfizer knew it before it sought approval for its
In part, this is good news: that still
in the United States the legal-judicial system is capable of achieving some transparency (3). But, at the same time,
it is an ominous sign of the state of the world. We have not heard of
another nation in the world where a judicial/legal challenge at this
level demanding transparency has been allowed to prosper (4).
It is now even more evident the absolute lack of interest of
governments around the world to objectively audit the results and
methods of those companies that are being paid billions of dollars and
entrusted with the public health of millions of citizens. If any
government in the world took seriously the news that Pfizer concealed
1291 side effects, they would be shocked, but no one seems to have been
surprised or re-examined their relationship with Pfizer or other
Pfizer withheld information that totally alters the perception of the
risk/benefit of their pseudovaccines. The FDA actively participated in
concealing that information. Is not that the definition of
"fraud" and "institutional fraud"? But no criminal liability has
resulted from this.
Meanwhile, in the rest of the world, governments choose to ignore this
and continue to grant pseudovaccine manufacturers a proverbial golden
rail. They act as if the manufacturers' clinical studies can only be
flawless and need not to be examined "in so much detail". Is this not
the definition of a "conspiracy" (6) – a coordinated effort
to conceal the truth?
If anyone, at this point, cannot see it (7), it is probably because
they are not destined to see it (8),
but the Mercy of God demands that we continue to warn while it is still
(Article by Emerald Robinson; dated 4-Mar-2022) (Our underscoring)
- "Cumulative Analysis of
Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports" (Note that,
although this report is labeled as "Confidential", a judge has forced
the FDA to release it)
we have amply explained elsewhere (an example),
the United States of America is the last stumbling
block for the plans of those who still think
that they will be able to establish a New World
(4) Is democracy not
working as it should? - Another trap from satan
(5) Why do we insist on calling
them "pseudovaccines" (apparent/fake vaccines)? Because, as they
themselves have acknowledged, those biological devices do not provide
sustained immunity (See The Failure of
(6) Proven Conspiracies
(7) What we are seeing before
our very eyes can be described as the
establishment of totalitarianism
(8) Eyes to See and Ears to Hear. Who are those
who possess them?
New Testament summarized in two sentences
FROM OUR FILES: August
From miguel de Portugal
Today we wish to present to you the entire New Testament in two
sentences. It will show you, without a doubt, how simple all is
complicated it has been made by man to glorify himself.
not think that I have come to
abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to
fulfill them. [Matthew 5:17]
...and He was speaking about the Law given to Moses as He confirmed
is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be
fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets
and the Psalms. [Luke 24:44]
Condensed Message of New
in accordance to the Law given by God to Moses;
Therefore, if you believe that
I am the one and only announced Messiah, thus
strive to act according to what I have just said, you will have Eternal
Recognize in Me the Prophetic
announcements of the coming Messiah; and
Be aware that not living in
accordance to the Law, the
calamities announced by the Prophets will come upon you as natural
And that is it!
Related document: A Condensed
Introduction and Conclusion
On the Act of
Consecration to Mary staged by Francis in March 25th
Given its relevance, we have converted into a document of its own the
information which was here. You can reach it through the following ink:
Why the news
about Russian nuclear missiles in Cuba since 2012 are still being
FROM OUR FILES: August
Russia has set their latest mobile strategic nuclear missiles
After the meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama, Putin made a sudden
harsh statement to the press. (1)
“In 2001 I, as the President of the
Russian Federation and the supreme commander, deemed it advantageous to
withdraw the radio-electronic center Lourdes from Cuba. In exchange for
this, George Bush, the then U.S. president, has assured me that this
decision would become the final confirmation that the Cold War was over
and both of our states, getting rid of the relics of the Cold War, will
start building a new relationship based on cooperation and
transparency. In particular, Bush has convinced me that the U.S.
missile defense system will never be deployed in Eastern Europe.
The Russian Federation has fulfilled
all terms of the agreement. And even more. I shut down not only the
Cuban Lourdes but also Kamran in Vietnam. I shut them down because I
gave my word of honor. I, like a man, has kept my word. What have the
Americans done? The
Americans are not responsible for their own words. It is no secret that
in recent years, the U.S. created a buffer zone around Russia,
involving in this process not only the countries of Central Europe, but
also the Baltic states, Ukraine and the Caucasus. The only response to
this could be an asymmetric expansion of the Russian military presence
abroad, particularly in Cuba.
In Cuba, there are convenient bays for our reconnaissance and warships,
a network of the so-called "jump airfields". With
the full consent of the Cuban leadership, on May 11 of this year ,
country has not only resumed work in the electronic center of Lourdes,
but also placed the latest mobile strategic nuclear missiles "Oak" on
the island. They did not want
to do it the amicable way, now let them deal with this”, Putin
FROM OUR FILES: March
miguel de Portugal
As you may recall, on March 8th
 we sent the following
communication to major media outlets in the
US and Europe, as well as to the White House:
considering the US/Russia stand off over Ukraine (2),
shouldn't you alert your readership ("citizens" for the White
House copy) that Russia has had their latest
mobile strategic nuclear missiles "Oak" in Cuba since early 2012?
Read on and act
upon it for the benefit of your readers. (1)
that this is not a rumor and is backed by the Russian press - which
still has the article on line - the fact that, as of today, no one
the mainstream media has even mentioned it, it speaks the proverbial
May this serve to further
confirm to you
the level at which the media is manipulated on a worldwide scale by one
hand. Want to guess whose hand?
FROM OUR FILES: July 21st,
Isn't it amazing....
flames of Russophobia (3)
being fanned and sprinkled with high octane gas
24/7 by the Globalists, the one real acusation that could be used
against Russia is not
Allow us to help those who are on denial regarding this matter wake up
and smell the proverbial coffee.
Russia has tactical
nuclear missiles in Cuba since May 2012 and Cuba is only 90
US shores. No, it was not reported by a recent publication of the
deceiver - QAnon (4).
Mr. Putin said it, we have echoed
it repeatedly and it still (5)
is on line on the Kremlin favored Pravda. (1)
But there is more to it. We
have communicated that information - with
link included - to key Media outlets including the Washington Post, the
New York Times, etc., etc. Yet, not a whisper about it throughout this
seemingly out-of-control Russophobia.
THINK about it! Snap out of denial! Grab your Rosaries and start
praying incessantly instead filling your heads with false news before
it is too late.
March 23rd, 2022
Why the news about Russian nuclear
missiles in Cuba since 2012 are still being ignored?
The answer to that question was already unveiled years ago through our
Given that the news about those missiles in Cuba have not been used to
charge Russia through the media, precisely now more than ever, when the
Russian invasion of Ukraine is taking place, there is no doubt that the
Globalists' plan to use Cuba – with the necessary minor adjustments –
is still on their road map.
- August 1st, 2012 - "Russia to
revive army bases in three oceans"
(2) For our readers in 2022: It
was in February and March 2014 when Russia invaded
and subsequently annexed the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine.
anti-Russia hysteria in 2016-2018 to denigrate and defeat Donald Trump
QAnon - another face
of the deceiver
(5) In 2018, when this
commentary was originally published, and still in 2022 as we are
(6) The Real
Purpose of the
Castro Regime - Why the Castro Regime has lasted for so long
Immunity: Do manufacturers of Covid "vaccines" trust in the safety
their own "vaccines"?
See by yourself... (1)
News Agency released a report warning that 167 million refugees around
the world are at risk of not
being vaccinated against Covid-19 because
pharmaceutical companies would not be covered by legal immunity
post-vaccination injuries. Those companies could be forced to pay
compensation for such injuries if those were to happen to refugees (2). In contrast to refugees, native citizens
in the US and the EU have no real way to be compensated by
pharmaceutical companies for post-vaccination injuries (3)(4). Draw your own conclusion.
If the risk of harmful side effects were small, it would be diluted in
the benefit of tens of millions of inoculations, but they have
calculated this and it does not pay off. Nobody can be more savvy than
them on this, since they have all the data. And then, their conclusion
is clear: every inoculation
is a risk according to their yardstick - money.
We know this is not news to many but, still, it is a reminder that the
simplest arguments to dismantle the official propaganda are in plain
sight for everyone to see without the need to read endless studies or promises on
the safety of Covid "vaccines".
What the risk/benefit analyses performed by others
show is the severity of the risk, since the risk, as shown by the
manufacturers' behavior, exists and is undeniable.
Snefff: Drug regulators and goverments must demostrate there is no
illegal human experiment underway (11-Feb-2022)
Refugees lack COVID shots because drugmakers fear lawsuits
You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side
24: Covid vaccine-makers largely protected on side effects
Russia-Ukraine war is making many people think about...
Since February 24, the day Russia's military attack on Ukraine began,
the document "The
Nuclear Bunker to Your Home"
has become the most visited daily document on our domain, at least for
the 10 days following that date.
Comparing the visits since February 24 with the equivalent period of
the previous month, we observe that the visits to this document have
increased 20-fold. Since many come to our domain through search
engines, this reflects that a large number of people have started to
search the Internet for such information because they are really
relating the Russia-Ukraine military conflict with the options of a
under 60 are more likely to die from the inoculation than from Covid
If one still tries to rationalize current events under the
assumption that Covid pseudo-vaccinations are for health...
A cost-benefit analysis by Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D. and researcher Kathy
Dopp concludes, among other things, that: (1)
(a) "Those under 18 are 51 times more
likely to die from the inoculation
than to die from COVID if not vaccinated."
(b) "Young adults age 18 to 29 have an
8 times higher risk of fatality from
the inoculation than from COVID if not inoculated."
(c) The protection
from COVID-19 death falls far short of the risk of dying from the
vaccine, for anyone
below 50 years old."
(d) "The COVID inoculations cause a net increase, rather than decrease, in
the likelihood of death for all persons under 60 years old."
(e) "For those over 60 years old, the
benefit of COVID inoculations is negligible, ranging from
0.0016% to 0.125%"
Their bottom line: "Mandates of
COVID inoculations are ill-advised because the alleged vaccines result
in higher death rates than COVID itself."
And their rationale on this outcome:
Omicron now the dominant strain, the vaccinated population are still
catching the disease in large numbers and spreading it. The mRNA
vaccines were designed to target the original SARS-CoV-2 strain, and
the arrival of variants like Delta and Omicron have changed the
risk/benefit ratio. With
such a large percentage of the population catching omicron and
recovering, we now have a much larger base of a naturally resistant
population, whose immunity is much longer lasting and robust than that
achieved with the vaccine. With Omicron being both less
deadly and more resistant to vaccine antibodies, the benefits of
vaccination are further weakened, while the risks of dying from the
vaccine remain unaltered. Even if we roll out new versions of
the vaccines, the virus will continue to mutate in a futile
This is just one study, do you want more?
and All-Cause Mortality Data Analysis by Kathy Dopp and Stephanie Seneff
(PDF) (dated 13-Feb-2022)
En Español: Para vuestra Información y Referencia -
© Copyright 2022 by The
All rights reserved. However, you may
freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as: (1)
Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are made
in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made
The M+G+R Foundation
Please Note: If the above dated image does not appear
on this document, it means that you are not viewing the original
document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.