Through
the Encyclical "Fratelli Tutti"...
Francis confirms himself as
The Apostle of a New World
Religion
For a New World Order
Originally published on July 26th, 2021
PURPOSE
In 2016, we alerted the faithful (1) that Francis has openly
activated the machinery to establish the intended One World Religion
that we have been announcing since the spring of 1993 (2).
The purpose of this new document is to alert that Francis has turned
his Encyclical letter "Fratelli
Tutti" (3)
into the founding
manifesto of the expected New Universal Religion, renouncing the
pre-eminence and sovereignty of God, and openly declaring the alliance
of the Church of Rome with the powers of the world - the New World
Order we have been announcing since the spring of 1993 (4) - to achieve on the
temporal plane the ends of Justice and Peace that can only be achieved
by God and with God (5).
INTRODUCTION
The fundamental issue of the Encyclical "Fratelli Tutti" is that God and Jesus Christ are kept
aside as non-essential elements in the plan of salvation of
humanity to remedy the world's problems advocated by Bergoglio.
If the reader wants to check this bold disregard for the role of God
and the Christian Faith, he/she has to face reading the long, tortuous,
boring and very unenlightened Encyclical in its entirety. But also,
with much less effort, he/she can quickly skim through it to see when
and
how, in the Encyclical, key words such as "God", "Jesus" and "Faith"
are used - never at the heart of the project of "universal fraternity"
(3).
All along his Encyclical, through a systematic omission of our
total
dependence on God and the foundation of the Christian Faith, Bergoglio
implies that "universal fraternity", without need of God or Faith,
will solve the injustices of the world. In this line, he states that:
"A
real and lasting peace will only be possible on the basis of a global ethic of solidarity and cooperation
in the service of a future shaped by interdependence and shared
responsibility in the whole human family." [Ch. 3, Par.
127]
And what about God? Is God not necessary for "real and lasting peace"? Is "ethic" more powerful than
religion? Is "solidarity" a
greater virtue than charity? Is he a man of faith or an atheist
politician speaking?
In his Encyclical, Francis "forgot" to mention that permanent
supernatural contact with God is the only thing that can keep
"fraternal love" in a live and healthy state. And if he "forgot" to
mention this key issue in a document on fraternity, with ample
opportunity to do so in such a long encyclical, it is either because he
does not believe it is an important issue or because he does not believe it to be
true.
The "good will" of men is not
enough. Man, separated from God, is worse than a wild animal,
and human history proves it. But Bergoglio believes, on the contrary,
that it is possible to solve the injustices of the world just by
appealing to the "good will"
and "solidarity" of men, without the need
of God.
If he believed otherwise, if
he truly believed that recourse to God is indispensable for harmony among
men, he would not have written the Encyclical he has written in which God is a mere circumstance
beside man's effort to build, by social, political and economic means,
a world of peace, justice and unity.
DETAILS
Francis affirms that his Encyclical:
"is
addressed to all people of good will, regardless of their religious
convictions" [Ch. 2, Par. 56]
That, in itself, is not a problem. The problem is that, because what he
is putting on the table are the injustices of the world and possible
solutions, and precisely because he does not integrate God into the
formula, he is conveying - by omission - the false message that our
relationship with God is not
necessary to understand
and solve the
injustices of the world.
In particular, in attributing responsibility for the injustices of the
world, he lists a large number of political, cultural, economic and
social elements, but does
not stop to talk about the great
responsibility of organized religion (6). Among the causes he
cites are:
political
disunity, "narrow nationalisms", the selfishness of economic powers, an
erroneous "model of globalization", "transnational economic powers",
certain destructive ideologies, a lack of "historical consciousness",
"cultural colonization", a confrontation-based approach to politics, a
culture of "short-sighted culture, bereft of a shared vision", the
"obsession with reducing labor costs", certain "economic rules", "a
profit-based economic model", "certain, primarily economic, interests",
"the temptation to build a culture of walls", "the lack of an equitable
distribution of natural resources", "the shared passion to create a
community of belonging and solidarity", "neoliberalism", "the dogmatic
formulae of prevailing economic theory"...
If organized religion - and, in particular, the Roman Catholic
Hierarchy over which Francis nominally presides (7) - is indeed a bridge
between God and men, and if God is truly the Lord and Sovereign of the
Universe and can do and undo all things, then it automatically follows
that organized religion has had and has an essential and most responsible
role in the failure
of the world in relation to peace and justice - a role and
responsibility far more
important than the role and responsibility of the powers of the
world that Francis accuses.
On the contrary, if Bergoglio believes that religion, "the bridge
between God and man," has no supernatural power granted
by God, but is a human structure with the same limited powers as any
other, then it fits very well that Francis makes no reference to the
responsibility of the Church Hierarchy for the failed state of the
world regarding peace and justice.
Certainly, Bergoglio, the Vatican and the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy that
supports him in this enterprise, are proving once again, by turning to
the world and not to God to save the world from itself, that they do
not believe in the words of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ:
Amen,
amen I say to you, he that believeth
in me, the works that I do, he also shall do; and greater than these
shall he do. Because I go to the Father; and whatsoever you shall ask
the Father in my name, that will I do; that the Father may be glorified
in the Son. If you shall ask me any
thing in my name, that I will do. [John 14:12-14]
Sweeping the Christian Faith under the
carpet
Let's face it: In virtually every corner of the world, people have
heard
of the Christian Faith and know what it consists of. The unique role we
Christians ascribe to Jesus in healing the world's ailments, if it is kindly recalled in front of a
non-Christian audience without trying to convince or pressure them,
does not have be an offense to anyone.
But then, precisely because practically everyone has had contact with
the concepts of the Christian Faith, if a Christian leader speaks of
solving the problems of the world but "forgets" to speak of the
importance that we Christians give to our relationship with God and to
the very special role of Jesus, he is causing a scandal for everyone:
he is implying that, in his
heart and mind, he does not give true importance to his Faith (7).
In other words, Francis' intention to make his voice heard by all,
believers and non-believers, Christians and non-Christians, is not a valid pretext
for not speaking
about God, for not
remembering that God created us out of Pure Love and that He is the only true source of Love
in all its forms, including fraternal love. But Bergoglio-Francisco has
chosen not to talk about it.
The intention of not hurting the sensitivity of non-Christians is not a valid pretext
for not remembering
that we Christians believe that Jesus - the Word of God made flesh - is
the only physician capable of
healing a sick humanity. But Francis has chosen not to mention
this "small detail".
If, for example, St. Paul had been as "prudent" addressing the
unbelievers of Athens [Acts 17:16-34] as Bergoglio is
addressing "all people of good will", St. Paul would not have spoken of
the Resurrection of Jesus in front of the Athenians, they would not
have been scandalized by the matter [Acts 17:32] and
St. Paul would have had the opportunity to suggest to them some
political and judicial reforms based on "fraternity" and "solidarity"
which would have been better heard... but that is neither the mission nor the methods of a
Christian apostle!
Bergoglio's speech sounds like the speech of a politician or an atheist
trade unionist, of someone who is ashamed of his faith and hides it
under the table, not of a Christian leader, not even of a Christian
individual. Immediately, Jesus'
instructions come to mind:
"No
man lighteth a candle, and putteth it in a hidden place, nor under a
bushel; but upon a candlestick, that they that come in, may see the
light." [Luke 11:33]
Does this have any precedent? Can we imagine that a true Christian
evangelist would stop talking about our absolute dependence on God and
Jesus' role in our Salvation just to make the Gospel more "friendly" to
non-believers?
In the face of these facts, there is only one explanation: Bergoglio -
and, with him, the entire immense court of Cardinals and Bishops who
support him in his project of "Fraternity" (8) - does not have much
appreciation for the Christian Faith and, instead, places his trust in
what man can do by his own means, that is, in the powers of the world.
Trusting in men more than in God
Did Jesus accuse the Roman Empire of the evils of the world? Did He
propose to remedy the injustices of the world by reforming the Empire?
Instead, Bergoglio affirms that:
"We
need to attain a global
juridical, political and economic order which can increase and
give direction to international cooperation for the development of all
peoples in solidarity." [Ch. 4, Par. 138]
Jesus Christ did not entrust nor exhort Caesar to transform the world (9). He entrusted and
exhorted the task to Peter, the other Apostles and their successors,
but not through the methods of Caesar nor, of course, by way of
becoming Caesar's allies.
Bergoglio, from a position in which he claims to be the successor of St.
Peter (7), sees
himself as a political advisor and ideologue of the Empire of our day -
the New World Order - with which he hopes to establish an alliance
because he is firmly
convinced that only by Caesar's methods can "a real and
lasting peace" be
achieved in this world:
"The
development of a global community of fraternity based on the practice
of social friendship on the part of peoples and nations calls for a better kind of politics,
one truly at the service of the common good." [Ch. 5,
Par. 154]
He himself makes it clear that his advice is not simply moral but also
(and more extensively) political. In his own words:
"This
demonstrates the need for a
greater spirit of fraternity, (*)
but also a more efficient worldwide
organization to help resolve the problems plaguing the
abandoned who are suffering and dying in poor countries." [Ch.
5, Par. 165]
(*)
In the original Spanish (Bergoglio's primary language), the exact word
is "mysticism of fraternity", making more
evident the latent meaning of a "religion
of fraternity".
CONCLUSION
Reading these last words, which are confirmation of what he defends
extensively in the Encyclical, his approach could not be clearer:
Francis-Bergoglio proposes and defends a New World Order
in union with a
New World Religion, materializing that of which miguel de
Portugal, in the Name of God, has been warning the world since the
spring of 1993 (2)(4).
This new religion of Bergoglio is the "mysticism of fraternity" which,
as we have just seen, is disconnected from God and Faith and,
therefore, cannot be characterized as Christian Faith.
NOTES
(1) Jorge Bergoglio, accepted by
millions as Pope Francis, asks for prayers for One World Religion
(2) The
Ambush of One World Religion - Originally published in
the spring of 1993
(3) Francis' Encyclical Letter "Fratelli
Tutti" on Fraternity and Social Friendship - Annotated reproduction of
the original
(4) The
Attempt to Establish a New World Order - Originally published
in Spring 1993
(5) The
doctrinal fallacy that world power
and riches will bring Justice and Peace
(6) What was the failure of the Roman
Catholic Church? (Part 2
and Part 3) | The Alliance between
Church and State: A False Hope for the Faithful
(7) "Pope" Francis Denies the
Divinity of Jesus | Francis,
the Record
of an Anti-Pope | A Catholic Group is Open to
Francis' Resignation from
the Papacy
(8) Wolves
in sheep's clothing
(9) Jesus
Christ did not trust or exhort Caesar to transform the world
(10) Who is
Miguel de Portugal?
En Español: Francisco, el apóstol de una Nueva
Religión Mundial para un Nuevo Orden Mundial
Published on July 26th, 2021
© Copyright 2021 - 2022 by The M+G+R Foundation.
All rights reserved. However, you may
freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as: (1)
Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are made
in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made
for it.
Related
Documents
The M+G+R Foundation
Please Note: If the above dated image does not appear
on this document, it means that you are not viewing the original
document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.