The M+G+R Foundation
Maitreya On Creation
vs Evolution
A
Guest Document
INTRODUCTION by
The
M+G+R Foundation:
Who
is Maitreya? In a nut shell - Maitreya is
claimed to be an individual awaited by all faiths under
different names: Maitreya
is the Christ to
Christians, the Imam Mahdi to Muslims, Krishna to Hindus, the Messiah
to Jews,
and Maitreya Buddha to Buddhists. He is the World Teacher for all,
religious
or not, an educator in the broadest sense.
In miguel de Portugal's language: The
False Christ or a False
Christ stand-in
The reader is invited to review an article - just released through
his
front organization - Share
International - which we find quite disturbing.
After we have
amply shown how the Creation Theory and Evolution Theory come together;
actually, depend on each other for their validity (1), now Maitreya, as
reflected in the article they have released, has picked up on that and
is taking possession of that knowledge given to miguel de Portugal by
God.
The timing for us to find out about this situation could not be better
since God has revealed to miguel additional information which
encompasses even greater - were that possible - details of humanity's
history with concrete physical proofs. Information which we were
getting ready to
publish in our Domains; something that we will not do now. Most
likely such information will be dispensed to those in our various
Mailing Lists as of December 19th.
The
Maitreya article
for Share International magazine (2)
December 2008
Evolution versus
creationism
by the Master (Maitreya) —, through
Benjamin Creme, 9 November
2008
Many
people believe, or affect to believe, that this world as it stands
today is not more than 5,000 years old; that Man and all the creatures
of the animal kingdom and the rocks of the mineral kingdom were created
in a few days, fully fledged and finished in all aspects.
They
hold that evolution is a myth, that the Christian Bible account of
creation is literally true and correct. To accept such a theory it is
necessary to close one’s eyes to science in general and to the sciences
of geology, anthropology, palaeontology and archaeology in particular.
It
is indeed true to say that there was a time when men did not walk the
Earth, when dinosaurs, gigantic in size, roamed and ruled instead. It
is also true that, according to Our reckoning, Man’s history is
infinitely older than today’s science believes. By today’s reckoning,
humanity is approximately five or six million years old at the most. By
Our science and tradition, however, early animal-man had reached the
point when individualization became possible, and the ‘Sons of mind’
began their long journey of evolution. It has taken Man 18-and-a-half
million years to reach the level of today. How then is it possible for
intelligent, educated ‘creationists’ to hold, against the evidence of
science, what seems to be a ludicrous concept?
Cross-purposes
The
answer lies in the fact that the evolutionists and the creationists are
really arguing at cross-purposes; both, in their limited way are right.
Modern scientists, looking objectively at the findings of Darwin, have
accumulated a wealth of evidence for the case of evolution, a long,
slow development of men from animal ancestors, in particular by the
development of mind.
The creationists look to the
Christian Bible as their guide, ignoring the fact that the Bible was
written by hundreds of people over hundreds of years; that it is
written in symbolic language, and is meant to be symbolic rather than
factual. The creationist is at pains to emphasise that ‘Man’ was made
by God, in ‘God’s own image’, and so owes nothing to evolution. To
such, Darwin and those who follow him are missing the point about Man:
that he is a spiritual being, of divine heritage, and if he does not
always behave as God’s creation he has been corrupted by Satan.
Bridged
Can these two diametrically opposed
views be bridged and expanded at
the same time? From Our point of understanding the scientists of today,
the evolutionists, are undoubtedly correct in their analysis of Man’s
development from the animal kingdom. We owe our physical bodies to the
animal kingdom. That, however, does not make us animals. Darwin, and
those who correctly followed his thought, describes only the outer,
physical development of Man, largely ignoring that we are all engaged
in the development of consciousness. The human body has all but reached
its completeness: there remains little further to be achieved. From the
standpoint of consciousness, however, man has scarcely taken the first
steps towards a flowering which will prove that man is indeed divine, a
Soul in incarnation. One day, the fact of the Soul will be proved by
science and so become generally accepted, and the old dichotomy will be
healed.
_______________________
(1) Creation Vs. Evolution through miguel
de Portugal - Part
1 and Part
2
(2) Source of Maitreya article:
http://www.share-international.org/magazine/old_issues/2008/2008-12.htm
© Introduction Copyright
2008 - 2016 by The M+G+R
Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and
distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as
to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior
written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.
The M+G+R
Foundation
About Us
and
Frequently Asked
Questions
Our
Research Department
Please
Note: If the above dated image
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.
If
you wish to contact The M+G+R Foundation, please
access our Contact Page
and follow the
instructions.