August 1989: Disease has ravaged the surviving population in the US. About 30% of survivors have been afflicted with one or more of the following: dysentery, food poisoning, viral gastroenteritis, typhoid, influenza, and pneumonia. These diseases have killed about 10,000,000 in the past year. Bubonic plague has broken out, killing nearly 1,000,000 so far and spreading to Mexico. Starvation is also a major cause of death: total food production in the U.S. in the past year was about 2% of that for the previous year.

Famines are occurring throughout the third world -  not from nuclear winter but from the social and technological collapse of agriculture. Much of the third world supplemented its agricultural capacity with fertilizers, insecticides, and food imports from the West. Political chaos in many areas and disruption of supply networks has also disrupted production. Food production in the third world in 1989 will be below half that of 1987.

Surviving Americans now number 45,000,000, including 4,000,000 Texans. A few million surviving Americans are permanently sterile due to radiation exposure. World population is now 3,300,000,000.

 

Also, I hope God will allow you to one day share those examples of Miguel's you mentioned. I am certain that many would benefit, myself included.

 

May God continue to bless and guide you all.

IC

A. As a reminder - not a focal point of devotion - what you say  is certainly not wrong.

Unfortunately humanity has a built in tendency to idolatry - of humans and of statues and images - and we must strive to avoid kindling those "idolatrous fires". People think, for example, that, next to Rome, Spain is the capital of Catholic practice. That would be the case  if you measure it in terms of tonnage of stones used in Cathedrals, Monasteries, Basilicas and Churches; or in the quantity of sacred images and the multitude of manifestations of the Virgin Mary.

 The truth is, however,  that,  if we had landed in Spain in a UFO coming from another solar system and reviewed how the Catholic Faith is practiced there, we would be convinced that we had arrived at "The Capital of the Idolatrous World".

Is painful to see how Jesus in the Tabernacle is ignored while statues and crosses are kissed, rubbed, licked, or whatever they feel like doing with them for "good luck".  There is a major Church in Salamanca where a very special crucifix is venerated - it is diametrically opposed to the tabernacle. We assure you - Jesus, in the tabernacle, see more rear ends lifted before Him, as the faithful bow to the crucifix, than faces of the faithful.

We have to make a concerted effort to avoid churches like those because, as time advances, we feel the pain of the offense more an more. We visited the oh-so-famous the Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela, where allegedly the remains of St. James are buried - something that we do not believe at all. Never again! The display of idolatry was simply revolting and offensive.

Wherever miguel is located, there are many two dimensional images and/or statues of Jesus, Mary, Saints and Archangels - it gives him great comfort to, wherever he looks, see the very familiar face of a loved one - however - those two dimensional images and/or statues are not always the same. They are different depending where he may be at or if he is traveling. The point: He is not "married" to this "miraculous Statue" or that "miraculous icon" - anymore than he would be to a photograph of his mother, or brother or favorite friend.

One may have a favorite image of Jesus or Mary - that is not a problem.... as long as the image means as much to the Faithful regardless where it may be found: Statue, icon, photocopy, prayer card, screen saver in the computer, etc. Again - the idolatry comes in when we fix our devotion to a physical object.

Unfortunately, there are many Demtrius' [Acts 19: 23-28]  who fuel the level of idolatry amongst the Catholic Faithful - with the clergy at the head.

This is another endeavor that the much maligned Popes John XXIII and Paul VI rightfully tried to accomplish through Vatican II.  As most know - idolatry is back in full swing.... otherwise, how else would Escriva be "adored" by his disoriented followers - who had the unmitigated gall to mark his tombstone with only two words: "El Padre" - "The Father". (1)

We pray that we have answered this question in full.
________________________________________
(1)  Escriva's tomb.

I pray God will allow you to clarify this for us.

Yahweh is an English rendition of יהוה, the Name of God as found in the consonantal Hebrew text. These four Hebrew letters (יהוה), known as the Tetragrammaton, are transliterated JHWH in German, and YHWH, YHVH, JHWH and JHVH in English.

Traditionally, observant Jews do not say this name aloud. It is believed to be too sacred to be uttered and is often referred to as the Ineffable Name, the Unutterable Name or the Distinctive Name. They often use circumlocutions when referring to the name of the Deity, e.g., HaShem ("The Name") or Shem HaMeforash (“the ineffable Name”) when reading the Tanakh aloud because the Name of God must not be spoken. They show such reverence because of how holy God's Name is and they do not want to ever give off the impression that they are misusing or taking the Lord's Name in vain. "Adonai" is spoken only in prayer, and YHVH is only written on paper that will not be thrown away or discarded. Adding vowels to the Name of the Lord is an insult to some Jews because the point is that it cannot be spoken because it is God's Name (to be). Even in English the vowel in God (G-d) is taken out in some cases to show extreme reverence. Even some Christians follow this tradition..

Various proposals exist for the vocalization of יהוה. Current opinion is יַהְוֶה (that is, Yahweh). The Yah part seems fairly certain, as attested by Hebrew theophoric names ending in -ia(h) or -yahu. Early Christian literature written in Greek used spellings like Ιαβε that can be transcribed by 'Yahweh'. Although contention still exists today many scholars accept this proposal.

While the editors of the Brown-Driver-Briggs Lexicon state that "יהוה i.e. יַהְוֶה n.pr.dei Yahweh," is "the proper name of the God of Israel." "יַהְוֶה" is actually only one particular proposed vocalization of "יהוה" and is not found in any extant Hebrew Text.

Being that there are not many orthodox Jews attending Roman Catholic Masses and that the Faithful is certainly not using the word in song to offend the Jews and much less God, it is ludicrous - but in keeping with the schedule - that the AntiChrist's Vatican would come up with that now.

When the Faith is almost extinguished in most of the world and cults like Opus Dei are taking control of whatever they want to control to further their agenda - it would be ridiculous to even consider such matter now.

How about not offending God, Who has sent Our True Heavenly Mother repeatedly to make up for the abysmal failings of those who present themselves under titles such as  "God on Earth" and other blasphemies, by obeying the simple requests of a Mother Who is so concerned for Her children who are heading for ruin at ever increasing speed?

What to do?

Now that you are aware that its use offends certain Jews - do not use it outside a liturgical environment.

If you personally feel now, because of the Vatican ruling, that it is offensive to God - of course - do not use it but also make sure that you follow all the other directives of Judaism as you practice your Catholicism. First stop for the males - the surgeon for a circumcision.

If you simply prefer not to use it for any reason - known or unknown to you - then continue not to use it.

The following reading may help you understand the logic behind the above:

1 Corinthians 8

1 Now concerning those things that are sacrificed to idols, we know that we all have knowledge. Knowledge puffeth up; but charity edifieth. 2 And if any man think that he knoweth any thing, he hath not yet known as he ought to know. 3 But if any any love God, the same is known by him. 4 But as for the meats that are sacrificed to idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is no God but one. 5 For although there be that are called gods, either in heaven or on earth (for there be gods many, and lords many).

6 Yet to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we unto him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him. 7 But there is not knowledge in every one. For some until this present, with conscience of the idol: eat as a thing sacrificed to an idol, and their conscience, being weak, is defiled. 8 But meat doth not commend us to God. For neither, if we eat, shall we have the more; nor, if we eat not, shall we have the less. 9 But take heed lest perhaps this your liberty become a stumblingblock to the weak. 10 For if a man see him that hath knowledge sit at meat in the idol's temple, shall not his conscience, being weak, be emboldened to eat those things which are sacrificed to idols?

If you are curious about miguel's personal preferences - the word from the Old Testament used to signify God that moves him deeply is Adonai. (3)

 

After reading the information posted on your website I surely felt bad that you've had such a bad experience.  I have been in Regnum Christi for 6 years now and have never experienced anything like this. I will pray for you and all those you claim have been mislead, and if someone has been misleading others, I will pray for them too.  I am not, of course, in a position to know what the truth is in your situation, I only know the truth within my own experience in Regnum Christi and that it has been a holy blessing for me and many others.

 

I do not know much about your organization but after reading the rules you have for publishing correspondence in your public forum, I certainly can hear a lack of charity.  I wondered, what Jesus would think about your rules for publishing correspondence.  I may not know the truth about your particular experience in Regnum Christi but I do know how to listen for God's truth in word and deed.  These rules alone do not promote truth or charity.  Especially rule #4, at your sole discretion, you may choose to post any letter lacking in charity and considered abusive.  In addition, you may disclose the persons full name and address.  This

is without a question uncharitable.  A truly holy person or even a simply honest person, will read right through this and realize the lack of charity this organization is basing its mission on.  If one quotes the Word of God and then practice something else, their motives are revealed and the truth is not found in them.  You should consider your practices!

 

After reading rule #2, I hesitated to even respond as I feared my letter may be misrepresented.  After all you did state you would publish it according to how you saw it fit.  However, I do know that the truth will set you free and in reality there is little anyone can do to manipulate truth.  In fact, if somehow my words were altered my words wouldn't affect any true follower of Christ because a true follower of Christ would see the lack of charity and realize it was not of truth.  After reading your rules, it was very difficult for me to trust your organization.  So I thought I'd share my insights with you.

 

 

[2]  We reserve the right to publish your communication, partially or totally, with the appropriate response, in our Public Forum if we deem that it will be edifying to others who seek light. We shall only use the name initials and country of origin to identify the letter, should it be published. (Initials will be withheld upon request)

 

[4] We reserve the right to publish any letter that we, at our sole discretion, consider abusive and lacking charity. In this case we may chose to disclose the full name and address of sender.

 [2]  We reserve the right to publish your communication, partially or totally, with the appropriate response, in our Public Forum - Part II if we deem that it will be edifying to others who seek light. We shall only use the name initials and country of origin to identify the letter, should it be published. (Initials will be withheld upon request)

[3] If you do not wish that your letter be published, let us know; however, do not expect a personal answer.

1.a particular system of religious worship, esp. with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
2.an instance of great veneration of a person, ideal, or thing, esp. as manifested by a body of admirers:
3.the object of such devotion.
4.a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc.
5.a religion or sect considered to be false, unorthodox, or extremist, with members often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader.

 

One item which has bothered me for a while is their reported membership numbers; globally between 85,000 and 90,000. While a large number of itself, on a global scale it seems a pittance. Some years ago when I first read about them on your site (and elsewhere) I thought: "gee, such a small number worldwide; how can anybody find THAT threatening".

 

I have matured and learned much spiritually and intellectually since then by the Grace of God and the power of the Holy Spirit....Deo Gratia!

 

Of course, what does not sink in right away is that those reputed 85K are the cream of the crop of the fields of education, banking, finance, media (ALL types of media, from records to print, to TV/internet journalism, etc.), and the clergy. Assuming that to be an honest figure (ha ha ha!), it does not take into account "Associates and Collaborators" of OD. This includes Diocesan and Order clergy, laity, as well as those of other faiths (or no faith?) who are friendly to and/or actively collaborate with OD and it "affiliates". Prior to reading the above cited book, I never saw any listings or estimates for this "invisible" membership.

 

According to the book, in Chile in 1950 there were 2000 members of OD, and 15,000 associates/collaborators! (and a grand total of 17,000)  Let this sink in: we speak of a Third World country nearly 60 years ago!!! So I took out my trusty calculator and found that 15K was 7.5 times 2000. Using that ratio......and the officially touted figure for the US membership of 5000, this gives us some 37,500 associates/collaborators, and a total of 42,500.

 

How much organized havoc can 42,500 OD folks cause? Put it another way: divided into 50 states, that gives 850 of them in each state. Of course they are not equally spread out, but it makes you think: how much organized chaos could 850 well organized, educated, financially well connected people cause in each state?

 

Considered globally, let's use the 85K figure for membership. Multiplied by 7.5 that gives us 637,500 Collaborators/Associates worldwide, for a grand total of: 722,500. Nearly 3/4 of a million highly organized and deeply committed souls.

 

Unfortunately they are committed to Mammon and its god, not to Jesus of Nazereth.......though some of them are deluded into thinking that they are. God forgive them.

 

Christ be with you always!

(a) For whosoever shall do the will of my Father, that is in heaven, he is my brother, and sister, and mother. [Matthew 12:50]

(b) ....if you ask the Father anything in my name, he will give it you.  [John 16:23]

And He also said:


Therefore - if you believe in Jesus, The Messiah, the Son of God - it logically follows that if you do your part (a) and (b), He will do His - (c)

Beyond that, what else can we say other than: May God Bless you! ?

From TF @ USA - Published on August 2nd, 2008

Q. Just this week, we have Edgar Mitchell and now a NASA employee confirming the existence of extraterrestrial (see attached) (1).  In a previous correspondence, you advised that there is no reason to suspect that God's creation of sentient beings is limited to this earth.

Granted that one can place nor imagine any limitation on God's ability or freedom to do as He may will.

But in light of what Scripture has warned us, that there would be a great deception in the end times, so powerful as to deceive even the elect, this latest and most recent disclosure warrants another question to you.

Aware that the satanic agents plan to use holographic and mind control technologies to simulate the 2nd coming, and cognizant that these same powers have long planned on an alien invasion as being an ideal premise for uniting the world "against" a common enemy, it begs the question as to what is real and what is false.

Could the existence of aliens be real?  It appears so.  If so, are these aliens creatures of God? They must be as God is God. But are they fallen angels in disguise?  Is this a demonic deception? Are all the alleged on going treaties between governments and alien species, nothing more than a satanic plot to dupe world leaders and eventually the vast majority of mankind?

This is not idle curiosity on my part, but rather an attempt to be faithful to the admonition of Scripture to watch and pray.  If most of the world is to be deceived, there must be a few of us who are able to explain the reality of the situation to those who unfortunately are most vulnerable to being deceived....the vast majority of Catholics as well as "born again" Christians who expect to be "raptured" before all hell breaks loose.

I am sure that I am not the only one who is concerned about this, and I hope that you will address this issue when you can.

I am grateful to God that He has given this ministry to you.  You and your mission to guide all who seek to serve God faithfully, His remnant, are in my prayers.

TF

A.  For a very comprehensive answer Click Here


From PY @ USA - Published on July 31st, 2008

Note from The M+G+R Foundation: We have received a number of references from this fine lady - a long term member of our Family - regarding the already famous Planet X.

Some of the references go as far as showing (proving?) that Google and Microsoft are hiding something in space , and we quote:

The area in question is located in the Southern part of the Constellation of Orion, below the ecliptic (the plane) of the solar system. An area of space that has long been of interest to Planet X / Nibiru researchers.

PY

A. We have not pursued any of the links nor the missing star theories. This is why:

1. As we have said many times in the past : If we were " a known face" and knew with 100% certainty  that a comet was to hit the Earth in say, a week, we would not say a word about it.  Actually we would do all possible to hide the information. Why?....

2. Because if that was the case, there would not be one thing man could do to prevent the catastrophe, instead, panic and total chaos would ensue with many "last minute mortal sins" committed on the basis of  "...well, it does not matter any more." or "...what are they going to do to me?"  or "...let's have one big for the road!" (to hell, we presume?) etc.

The only thing that man could do -and should have done- was to pray and offer acts of reparation through much needed acts of charity.  That would have prepared many for instant death and others would have been protected from instant death.

We have called for such actions through several documents for many years. Although we had very active Planet X pages (1) , we stopped updating them quite some time ago since that was all God wanted us to do about it (for the reasons explained above). The warnings of the possible event were well illustrated - those who had Eyes to See, saw and acted, others did not.

Jesus did not give us the parable of the Ten Virgins (2) because that night they were not transmitting a Home football game [Romans Gladiators vs Galilean Fishermen] and His disciples were bored. A very powerful message was delivered through said parable.... but who is listening? Better yet - who has listened and act upon it for the last ca. 1900 years. Maybe the manufactures of olive oil have since they have a variety called Virgin Olive Oil....

Jesus warned the Temple Masters, who crucified Him, that not a stone of the Temple would remain standing (3), did they believe Him?  Did the Temple remain standing? Many of His initial disciples were still alive when the Temple was no more.

We are not judging anyone who may be pursuing such sport - "To catch a Planet X" but we again remind one and all that time spent in prayer, acts of reparation and charity will be infinitely worth more that chasing Planet "X".  Remember that when the closest comet to fly by our planet (4) was discovered - the discoverer would have only had 12 hours notice.

Let us Pray, and then Pray Some More (5) - that is what God needs us to do for our own benefit certainly not His!

We thank dear PY for this opportunity.
__________________________________
(1) Planet "X"  and Planet "X" Notes
(2) Matthew 25: 1-12
(3) Luke 21: 5-6
(4) This was really a close call - with a purpose
(5)  Let us Pray, and then Pray Some More

Past Private Forums

Private Forum - May 2008

Private Forum - April 2008

Last Public Forum - October 2007 - Edition Files

Our Research Department