The purpose of this Public Forum is to
publicly respond to and/or
comment upon correspondence
that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal
interest
in these very unsettling times.
We reserve the right to choose what
questions to address and how to
transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence
received.
The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in
the
case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the
appropriate
responsible entities.
From (Mrs.) JS @ US - Published
on July 31st, 2007
Q. satan roams the earth seeking whom he may
devour, seduction by Enlightened leadership. We
should fear every form of domination!
There
are good things about the Ecumenism movement, to be sure, but it seems
that the O. D. fingerprint is all over the protestant church in USA,
both the so-called liberals and the so-called fundamentalists.
By every means EXCEPT dedication to God and prayer, they seek
to control society and the government for their own agenda. They behave just like aggressive homosexuals
seeking converts: innocent, generous, charming, and ultimately
controlling.
Is there a known connection between O.D. and the
protestants, or is the similarity just in the satanic fingerprint?
(Mrs.) JS
A.
As we have stated before, they will make alliances with whomever they
think will advance their own agenda, and then move on leaving the
former "allies" empty handed.
This may be seen even through the writings of a friend, not an enemy. A
Spanish Historian who even said: So that my [de la Cierva's] evaluation be
better understood I will
summarize it as follows: Opus Dei was invented, and invented well;
however, if it did not exist, it would have to be invented with great
urgency. Many things, especially within the Church, depend on it.
Even though, you may want to review
the
rest of his comments for a real
eye opener.
We also published another example - although there are so many that we
could make a full time job of keeping a Blog on it - where we see
their
alliance with the Promise Keepers.
Ultimately, if you review our document -
The Saviors of the World Are
Having Family Problems - you will see how those alliances work and
how
they fail. A failure about which
we
warned the Vatican during
John Paul II Pontificate and which
will
eventually crush them.
Once they were warned officially - our hands are washed.
Thank you for the opportunity to set this record clear.
From Some of Our Readers @ World - Published
on July 28th, 2007
Q. Why do you publish letters with such
negative views of, and at time insulting remarks about, the work of
miguel de Portugal? Isn't this counterproductive to your stated
objective?
Some of Our Readers
A.
For the same reason we highlight the "official" rating of the miguel de
Portugal as a false prophet according to The Catholic Planet
(1)
and
ignore the Sherlock Holmes tendencies (2)
of another disoriented priest by
the name of John Loughnan.
The answer lies within the little understood words of Jesus which were
read in one of the Masses of this week. In the Gospel according to
Matthew 13 we read:
10 And his
disciples came and said to him: Why speakest thou to them in
parables?
11
Who answered and said to them: Because to you it is given to
know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven: but to them it is not
given.
12 For he that hath, to him shall be given,
and he shall
abound: but he that hath not, from him shall be taken away that also
which he hath.
13 Therefore do I speak to
them in parables: because seeing they see not, and hearing they hear
not, neither do they understand.
14 And the prophecy of Isaias is fulfilled
in them, who saith:
By hearing you shall hear, and shall not understand: and seeing you
shall see, and shall not perceive.
15 For the heart of this people is grown
gross, and with their
ears they have been dull of hearing, and their eyes they have shut:
lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their
ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should
heal them.
As we approach the End of These Times, it is the Will
of God that the Elect be assisted in their spiritual preparation for
what is to come, otherwise their suffering would be great before they
respond and open their Eyes to See and Ears to Hear. Therefore we speak
clearly and reveal secrets which have not been revealed since the
beginning of history - such as the Secret Concept of the Trinity (3),
Mysteries Which Allow Us to Better Understand Heavenly Messages (4),
How
Transubstantiation is Performed (5),
etc. as well as expose well covered snares before the Elect is
entrapped by them (6).
Well, we certainly do not want individuals like VAR [see posting below
dated July 23rd] to come back and tell us "I thank
you for a lot of information that I gathered from your site."
VAR does not appear to be amongst the Elect (7) and
he should have been
shushed away from our Site a long time ago. Therefore, if we highlight
negative information hurled at miguel de Portugal and The M+G+R
Foundation, only those who have Eyes to See and Ears to Hear can
discern the truth - whether Catholic, Muslim, Jews or atheists -
and will see the lies in such attacks and ignore them; the others, the
ones with "store bought" faith will run away in horror and continue to
live in their errors so that their place amongst those who are in
".
..the exterior darkness: there
shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth."
[Matthew 8:12] is certainly
secured.
It is amazingly simple. Many times we have
said symbolically that "we are not on commission" meaning that
we are not selling anything - it is a "take it or leave it" proposition
and we really mean that. We will reach, directly and indirectly, each
one God Wills to be reached - as for the rest - it truly is not of our
concern. Do you think this is cruel? No, no - it is not. Are we
going to try
to be more Merciful than God? God forbid! Haven't you read about Divine
Mercy in Action? (8)
Notes
(1) We
wonder how The Jerusalem Temple
Planet would have rated John the Baptizer and Jesus Christ?
(2) The
poor man made an amateurish issue of trying to find out the civil name
of miguel de Portugal when, anyone who is anyone in the Vatican,
Opus Dei included, as well as the political centers of the world know
exactly who he is and have more film footage of him than Hollywood and
the paparazzi have of Tom Cruise.
(3) The
Secret Concept of the Most
Holy Trinity
(4) Mysteries
which allow us to better understand Heavenly Messages
(5) How
Transubstantiation takes place
(6) The
Fatima lies, for example.
(7) Who are
the Elect
(8) Divine Mercy In Action
From (Mrs.) Initials Withheld @ US - Published
on July 23rd, 2007
Q. Somehow I think e-mails have crossed and not
been read. You asked if I would allow you to use something I had
written in a letter to you. Please, please, use anything you
would like.
Somehow you always write something that I am wondering about and you
clarify everything. I do come away from your web site,
encouraged, strengthened and a lot more hopeful. When I am
discouraged or sad, I always RUN to your web-site to read
your message. Invariably, it always is something that I can apply
to my life to make me a better follower of My Lord, Jesus.
Without Him, I can do nothing and I know it. Without YOUR help, I
would have a miserable time trying to find the truth and so God's
blessings to you and M de P...
I love all of you.
What a gift you are.
In His Name
(Mrs.) Initials Withheld
A.
Your kind words Glorify God Whom I try to serve in spite of my many
shortcomings and limitations.
We appreciate your confidence and your blanket authorization to publish
whatever you send to us. Please forgive us if we, from time to time ask
again. We rather inconvenience you with one more e-mail and to
make the mistake of publishing something that you wanted to keep
confidential yet forgot to specify it.
As Providence would have it, we received, together with your most
encouraging note the following communication. God does not make
mistakes so we will also publish it and address thie poor man's
problems.
From (Mr.) VAR @ Dubai - India - Published
on July 23rd, 2007
Q. I have been reading your site for over a
year. I know that a lot of things are not right within the Catholic
Church of Rome. I agree with you that we ought to pray for ourselves
and for our priests and shepherds and for the world at large. I thank
you for a lot of information that I gathered from your site. But who
are you anyway?
Your website tells precious little or nothing about your identity
and that brings John 3:20-21 to mind..... For all
I know from your website you could be an agent of Maitreya and
using certain of the brain washing techniques that you speak of the way
you provide publicity of Opus Dei.
Your own writings condemn you.... etc.
So you will say that you don't claim to be the Christ. Thank God for
that! So you claim you are Elijah. Where then is Enoch who is supposed
to arrive at the same time?
And seriously man, given the poverty figures we got from one of your
postings, do you think that God will choose the Internet of all things
to reach His people with such a message? etc. Don't make me laugh!
And as usual, being American you guys think the world is America.
etc.
Your writings show you to be a person of enormous pride and pomposity.
etc.
Your writings are more about "saving" America than anything else.
Therefore your advice for preparing for the last times events include
hoarding up gasoline for the car, etc. Typically American to think
people would just own a car!
The God I know, and like you say, KNOW, NOT BELIEVE, BUT KNOW, IS FAR
KINDER THAN THAT. So by all means ask people to pray.
But desist from tall claims of being Elijah and the like. And learn
some humility man. You NEED it! Why? etc.
Ha! Curb your arrogance! I say this for your own good. GOD IS FAR
GREATER THAN YOU MAKE HIM OUT TO BE!
I will pray for you! You need it!
(Mr.)
VAR
A.
We thank you for your prayers and the opportunity to offer our readers
a "live example" of a hateful and disoriented faithful bordering on
fanaticism as well as clearly illustrating what Jesus meant through
Matthew 7:6 (1).
We could not have invented such perfect examples.
Perhaps you should ponder not so much on who miguel de Portugal is but
on the reasons for which anyone who has such a low regard about what we
publish in the Name of God and about miguel de Portugal himself
has "...been
reading your site
for over a year....
I thank you for a lot of information that I gathered from your site."
Such lack of coherence only
reinforces your level of disorientation and
your hateful disposition, which has no redeeming value and is as far as
it could possibly be form what Jesus Christ has taught humanity.
No further correspondence from you will be accepted in the
future. We joyfully accept constructive criticism but yours does
not fall in that category.
You may be assured of our prayers for, if we do not pray for you, with
your disposition - who would?
Note
to our readers: (a) We have partially edited Mr. AR's message to
avoid his incurring a greater debt with Heaven (2) ; (b) If
anyone wishes to have Mr. AR's e-mail address
to assist him in his journey, request it and we will make it available
to you.
_____________________________
(1)
6 Give not
that which is holy to dogs; neither cast ye your pearls before swine,
lest perhaps they trample them under their feet, and turning upon you,
they tear you.
[Matthew
7]
(2) Acts
5: 34-39
From PB @ Mauritania - Published
on July 20th, 2007
Q. If we have got Garabandal with its warning and
miracle, why do we have also Medjugorje with its warnings and the
promise of a visible permanent sign?
Is there duplication?
Thank you.
PB
A.
The Apparitions and
Messages of Garabandal have been greatly ignored
(suppressed in a country
practically ran by Opus Dei) when compared
with the original
Apparitions and Messages of
Medjugorje [See Note 8] .
Therefore, it is logical that God would utilize another channel which
would became very popular due to the regime change in Yugoslavia which
people incorrectly
associated with the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart.
As we have said - satan must still serve God and God will see, Opus Dei
or not, that His Elect find the Way back to Him, a Way that has nothing
to do with Escriva nor the other sects within the Roman Catholic Church.
However, the Faithful must remain alert since the Garabandal
Apparitions and Messages may have been already intoxicated as Fatima
was.
From WS @ US - Published
on July 18th, 2007
Q. I wonder what you have to
say about making Sunday being the
day of the Lord instead of Saturday. Was this not a Commandment
given to Moses
as were the other nine?
How could the institutional Catholic Church decide
that this one should be changed and enforce the other nine?
As a child I
remember the priests saying that missing Mass on Sunday would be a
mortal sin.
What condemnation are we under if we do not keep holy the Lord's Day
which is Saturday the Sabbath?
I fully understand that most Protestants,
Orthodox and Anglicans also celebrate Sunday as the Lord's Day.
Am I
misinterpreting this?
WS
A.
Your point is indeed interesting since even Jesus confirmed which
should be the Sabbath day in His death.
He was alive on Friday, He was alive again on Sunday, but He rested in
His Tomb on Saturday, the Sabbath.
Another point of interest is that in Portugal - a country certainly
favored by Heaven - they name week days by their numbers except
Saturday and Sunday. What makes it very interesting is that in
Portuguese Monday is "Segunda" (i.e., Second day of the week) and on
down the line to Friday which is called "Sexta" (i.e. Sixth day of the
week).
Of course, after the Sixth day of the week (Friday) comes the Seventh
day of the week - Saturday, the Sabbath.
As you may recall, Sunday is the first day of the week in Judaism and,
"if our memory does not fail us", Jesus was a Jew.... but, then again,
inferring
from what comes out of the Vatican one may think: "What does He
know?"
Knowing what was ahead, Jesus clearly rebuked the "Church
Administrators" of His time, the Pharisees, when He said: The sabbath was made
for man, and not man for the sabbath. [Mark 2:27]
Now, miguel de Portugal, in His
Holy Name, reminds the Church Administrators of today that: Just as the sabbath was made for man and
not man for the Sabbath, organized
religion
was created for man and not man for
organized religion - regardless of what monotheist Faith
one may profess.
From TK @ USA - Published
on July 17th, 2007
Q. May the peace of God be with
you,
I am just curious. In reference to your recent mailing.... (1)
What do you think the church should do (I think, turn the men in
who committed these crimes to the police
and let the law take care of them)? The poor people who were
abused
get money. Money given to the church by the faithful. Does
this money
heal them?
Looks like almost 1.3 million dollars per person. These
victims are now taking money from the faithful not from the men who
committed these terrible crimes. It seems to me that what the
victims
should be asking for is for the men who committed these crimes to be
prosecuted and not for a "pay day" from the faithful of the catholic
church. In the end, it's all about money.
I am very sorry for these
poor people who were abused but taking money from the
faithful is not
right. How does this money heal them? No one gets away with
anything. God will make things right in the end for everyone.
Thanks for your time,
TK
_______________________________
(1) The mailing in question
follows:
Re: Los Angeles cardinal apologies,
offers record abuse deal
Quote:
The leader of the largest U.S.
Roman Catholic archdiocese apologized on Sunday for what he
called a "terrible sin and crime" as the church confirmed it
would pay a record $660 million to people who were sexually
abused by priests.
Facing trial on Monday over abuse
allegations dating as far
back as the 1940s, the Archdiocese led by Cardinal Roger Mahoney
agreed to pay 508 victims the largest-ever group settlement.
"I have come to understand far more
deeply that I ever
could the impact of this terrible sin and crime that has
affected their lives," said Mahony.
"There really is no way to go back and
give them that
innocence that was taken from them," he said. "Once again, I
apologize to anyone who has been offended, who has been abused.
It should not have happened, and it will not happen again."
The settlement was the latest chapter
in a clergy abuse
scandal that has rocked the Roman Catholic Church worldwide,
damaging its moral standing and forcing five U.S. diocese to
seek bankruptcy protection.
Comments:
The real criminals are the members of
the Hierarchy - all
the way up to
the Chair of Peter - who allowed this to go on indefinitely and who, by
shuffling priests from Diocese to Diocese, spread the destruction,
while Mary says
Enough!
Now the Faithful's money has to be used to bail them out.
Using world logic, the only logic they know:
Can the
Hierarchy be
blamed to make the
Faithful believe that there is no Salvation outside
the Roman Catholic Church? How else could the Church
Administration
continue to bilk the Faithful out of money?
Surely Mahoney soon will be rewarded as
Law and
Levada were while the
innocent Faithful
will continue to dole out their money in the hopes of a sure (and
automatic: you pay = you are saved) Salvation.
How sad, how terribly sad.... but how "on schedule" all is.
Please Note: You are
receiving our mailings because you
requested to be in our list and we accepted your request. We
also remind the readers about our position which we published years ago
and repeatedly quoted since:
Should
you believe what
miguel de
Portugal says through the pages of
The M+G+R Foundation? You do not have to believe it. What is
written is only
for those who
have Eyes to see and have Ears to hear. Woe to miguel if he does not
speak
loud and clear. Nothing has
changed in the manner in which God has communicate
with His children in the last 6,000 years.
If you do not wish to receive our
mailings, please let us know so that
we may remove your address from our list for we certainly do not wish
to interfere in any way with the future of your soul.
A to Mr. TK:
We regret the inconvenience due to an internal technical error.
Your
address should have been removed from all of our Lists and not from
just some of them. [See Public Forum June 4th, 2007, Posting]
It is obvious that you do not understand, or do not wish to understand,
what we write in the Name of God and, as we stated in our mailing, we
certainly
do not wish
to interfere in any way with the future of your soul.
No need to contact us any further - your correspondence will be
automatically deleted by our systems. We have limited time and we
must
spend it with those who can understand what we write in the Name of
God, even when they question it in a constructive manner (see the
letter below from Mrs. BK).
May God Bless you, Mr. K, and let's move on!
From BK @ US - Published
on July 17th, 2007
Q. Firstly, please
do not think that this is a challenge to what you have stated regarding
Pope Benedict and the Church.
I am having a difficult time accepting that what we were taught
as children, that through the Catholic Church is the only way to
Heaven, is erroneous. What ever happened to the EENS dogma?
Is that also in error?
What I am "feeling" is very succinctly stated in the enclosed
editorial.
Thank you for your patience with me!
BK
A.
Your letter - your heart - is a sincere reflection of the way millions
upon millions of Catholics feel like, world wide. It is hard to
blot
out 1,600 years of brainwashing where the central message is: Do
not think,
we will do it for you and you can bank on Eternal Life!
In order to minimize the suffering of what is to come - and is here for
far too many already - we must help, in the Name of God, the
Faithful
to understand this.
Therefore - we will in due time and according to God's timetable -
prepare a document pretty much on the lines of what we did with
the
Marian Movement of Priests regarding the Catholic
Faith vs the Catholic Administration.
There is so much we must do,
yet, convincing people of the Truth is not one of them. We
present and clarify the Truth, for ease of understanding, and that is
the extent of our function
with the world population at large.
We thank you for writing for
it was God's way of letting us know that
we must prepare that final document regarding the Faith and the
Administration as we did with the Marian Movement of Priests.
From (Mr.) IW @ Europe - Published
on July 16th, 2007 [ Our
Lady of Mt. Carmel]
Q. Peace of God!
I want to ask you some question about your document "The Warning From
St. Paul".
(1)
I understand that "Paul clearly stated in the full text of said
exhortations that not following this urgent call was not to be
considered a sin but that it would be a good idea to follow them."
This is a general advice. However, on a personal basis (in
accordance to each one's condition), in some cases, the
promptness
or level of fulfillment that a person takes may negatively affect
others. Is it not?
The question I want to ask is about one very particular case. We know
that we, as you stated, "no longer have the luxury of a 13 years
advance notice as the Corinthians had; your 13 years period is just
about up". In fact, most readers of
The M+G+R Foundation Site,
know how many less years are left
(2). With that awareness,
would it
not be a great fault on responsibility for a couple to conceive a
child at the present historic moment? They must think about the
suffering that awaits not only to them but, additionally, to a little
third person, a new born child in mid of the Apocalypse!
Thank you and many continued blessings!
IW
A.
You have fully grasped the reality of said warning and
the consequences on third (and innocent) parties if we willfully act
ignoring it.
There is an additional aggravant: When Paul issued that warning, he did
not have "a sample" to back up his warning. Now, that said warning has
been issued again through miguel de Portugal (1), the world
has the example of Paul's time and how the warning became manifest.
_______________________
(1) The
Warning From St. Paul
(2) It's About That Time!
From Many @ Worldwide - Published
on July 13th, 2007 [ Mary,
Mystical
Rose (Rosa Mystica)]
Q. How could it be
possible that you exalt the basic
tenets of the Catholic Faith and yet, the words and
deeds
of the Administration of the Roman Catholic Church are so severely
condemned?
Many
A.
Today we observe the central message delivered by Mary as
She manifested Herself as Rosa Mystica by publishing a decisive and
line-drawing Apostolic
Document. In it you will find the answers to the question you
pose and will help you in determining which side of the line
you stand.
From WO @
USA
- Published
on July 6th, 2007 [First Friday] (0)
In re the matter ot Transubstantiation which you wrote of and my
recent note about the use/misuse/abuse ot Aquinas and Augustine as if
they were absolutely 100% infallible in all they wrote to bolster
"official church teaching" and enforce Canon Law which in turn
"justifies" the authority of the Administrators (1) of the
"Church".........
When one reads the musings of traditionalist oriented web sites
and forums, one is bombarded
with the concept that the Tridentine mass was "always valid" no matter
which priest said it, his sacramental intention (or lack thereof),
status as a heretic/apostate, spiritual state of the priest, or even of
questionable ordination status, that.......... in effect.......... a
Tridentine mass is always valid of itself as the sacramental intention
of the Church is to be presupposed...........
Oh really? My point is not to posthumously debate Aquinas and
Augustine on this point, but to restate that this most firmly held
position is the invention of men. It is not
based upon Divine Revelation. Further we know that neither Augustine
nor Aquinas had visions, locutions, heavenly messages or the like. What
they wrote....... it simply what they wrote. Being mortal, they may or
may not be correct - as they are not guaranteed personal
infallibility. (2)
For brevity, the point both expressed and implied is that the
Tridentine Mass is "guaranteed" validity, seemingly no matter what.
This is a theological "tiger trap". The mass and sacraments (3) are not
mere "rote ceremonials"; they are dependent upon the Rock (4) and faith in
Him. They only have meaning and validity in as much as the person
officiating has a genuine faith in Christ. My opinion would be that
they have no validity and become an abomination without true faith.
Hence we have the Dialectic played out in the Church over the last
40 odd years: remove the traditional mass, replace it with another
(Novus Ordu.... which, while defective CAN be said validly), create a
clamor for the return of "tradition/order/discipline". This will be
done by Opus Dei (OD) under the guise of being "saviours" of the faith (5) -
with a return of the TLM, to a greater or lesser extent.
Thesis + Antithesis = Synthesis. Ordo ab Chao....... order
out of chaos. It's all the same. The use of "tradition" will be used to
lure Catholics to "the church" under Ratzinger (6) and OD, who will then
collectively be viewed as having "saved" the church. Rather like
tempting a mouse with cheese, this will lure many spiritually weary and
ignorant to "the church'....... and serve to help deliver them
into the hands of the False Christ when he shall be made manifest by
"the church".
Mere "going through the motions"of a traditional mass with clouds
of incense and pretty music does not equal a valid mass, unless
what MDP has outlined in re Transubstantiation (7) takes place. To do so
without the proper mentally focussed intention is merely a ceremony -
not a valid mass.
I hope that I am on the right track; if I am not I hope that you
will correct me. You remain in my prayers.
Your prayers are greatly
appreciated.