The Public Forum of The M+G+R Foundation
The purpose of this Public Forum is to publicly respond to
that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal
in these very unsettling times.
We reserve the right to choose what questions to address and how to
transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence
The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in
case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the
Letters/Questions - Addressed on
September - October
From CH @ New
Zealand [Published on October 31,
attention has been so drawn to the various Marian apparitions and the
events surrounding them, that have happened over the years, that I now
question what is the purpose of our lives at all?
If we are so sinful and doomed, what real hope is there for humanity?
Why would we continue living our day to day lives as we do - for what
Unfortunately I have allowed this
preoccupation to infiltrate many aspects of my life and leave me with a
feeling of hopelessness.
A. "What is the purpose of our lives at all?" you ask.
Well, to answer that question, and to shed some light upon the rest of
concerns, we must first share with you the purpose of Creation - as
revealed to m de P by God.
We must remember that God created us in His image. That is, if we take
any of the traits found in a human being, except sin, of course!, and
raise it to its maximum perfection - that is how "God Is" in that
particular aspect - be it Love or Mercy or Justice, etc.
With that as a backdrop, we shall then ask you: When you (and most
who are not
experience a situation/event which makes you very joyful, what is the
first action you wish to take? Isn't it to share that joy and
happinness with someone?
God lives in perfect Joy and His Love is perfect. Therefore, if we,
miserable as we are, wish to share our joys and love with someone, God,
Who Is Perfect, Willed to do the same in a Universal Scale, thus He
created the Universe, to
sustain us, so that He could have us to share in His Joy and
Love. It is that simple!
We were to live in a Paradise-like state, as depicted by Adam and Eve
before the fall, but God, in His utmost perfection, allowed us a Free
misused it and fell.
Since satan, out of jealousy, caused our fall, thus, the missing the original opportunity to
live in the company of God in Eternal Happiness, God had to devise
another plan to "get His children back on track."
He sent His prophets; they were killed. He sent His Son to show us the
Way - Jesus Himself - the Word Made Flesh - but His physical body was
killed also. However, Being God incarnate, Jesus left a
concrete legacy that would help us journey
minimum of difficulties, so that we could finally be reunited with Him
and "retake" the Blissful life that God, the Father, had originally
intended for us to have with Him.
In comes the Church Administration
and sells itself,
thus thwarting again God's
Joyful plans for His
children. He then utilized several humans within the Church to
back on the right track.
Francis of Assisi was one of them - from the cross He commanded Francis
to "repair His Church" for it already was almost in ruins! That did not
work well either - as it may be easily discerned by the condition of
the world today.
God then sends the Perfect Daughter (of the Father), the Perfect Mother
(of the Son) and the Perfect Spouse (of the Holy Spirit), Mary, with
ever increasing frequency since early 19th Century,
to urgently call us back to the Gospel - to the Way
Our Lord Jesus Christ had shown us. She was even the Hostess to the
greatest Miracle ever witnessed by so many humans at once in
13, 1917 at Fátima, Portugal, as to
underscore the urgency of Her messages then.
To no avail....
Marian Apparitions are turned by the Church Administrators into Profit
Centers and into a tool of manipulation and control
criminally betraying their responsibility.
You ask: "What real hope is there for
humanity?" The hope is that God, in spite of our sinfulness and
the scandalous betrayal by the Church He founded, will no longer depend
any man or group of men to help us back to Him; He will now
it" Himself. We find great hope and
man, of himself, as manifested in organized religion, has proven to be
worthless as the result of his fallen condition.
You also ask: "Why would we continue living our
day to day lives as we do - for what purpose?" For the purpose of
assiting God in His direct intervention by "paving the way" so that the
that awaits mankind is minimized while Divine Justice is being
dispensed and prophecy fulfilled.
Do not be preoccupied nor feel hopeless. Join us, the true children of
God, in preparing the world - through
collective prayer, acts
of reparation and Evangelization, through example, to greet Him and
enter with and through Him the true Promised Land of Justice, thus, of
"How come the Pristine
Catholic Faith reached us in spite of
the betrayal of the Church Administrators?", you may ask. Because, as
we have stated
numerous times before, even satan must serve God for He is the only
and truly Almighty Who Is above all!
Portugal @ World
[Published on October 20,
Obviously we are not
making ourselves clear enough. We
trust that this should
From MW @ USA
[Published on October 19,
the Pro-Life and Pro-Choice debate, specifically the point that
convinces me that the Bishops' exhortations to vote against John Kerry
are not sincere, is that neither George Bush 41 nor George Bush 43 has
ever ever done anything substantive to overturn the US Supreme Court's
Roe v. Wade decision.
Their positions are simply pandering to the religious right wing of US
society. Actions speak louder than words. The Bushed are
happy to be perceived as ProLife while doing nothing with their
temporal authority to truly affect a change. Nothing sincere or
Why are the Christians in the US blind to this fact?
answer to this very valid question, please Click
[Published on October 15,
people have a smidgen of Biblical understanding and a glut of goulash
of Biblical ideas, most of them not coming even close to accuracy, or
truth. Better ask Mary (it is not definitely the Mary of the Bible you
are referring to, she would have a fit if she knew that you catholics
are making an idol of her, and a god), whoever she is who you are
referring to. Your religion is just that - religion, and I do not see
anywhere in your writings where you have a personal attachment to Jesus.
P @ USA [Published on October
Q. I have only one point to contend regarding your
article about the removal of the cross. The article has been posted
that the ACLU would remove the cross as the symbol of christianity.
a private lutheran school in the US until 8th grade. I was taught
that the symbol, while powerful, is interesting to ponder in this day
and age. Imagine a hypothetical christian wearing an electric
chair or gallows around her throat.
do not believe that the cross is what Jesus would have left for
humanity as the lasting symbol of His works. Christianity is about the
resurrection, not the execution of Christ. This is why Easter is
the most important christian holy day.
It is important to meditate upon the
sacrifice of Christ, but I do not agree that trying to reach out to
other religions by simply de-emphasizing a questionable icon is an
anti-christian doctrine. Outside of this conversation, we should
worship Christ and the Trinity, and not be hung-up on human
representations and iconic images.
Who's to say, for example, that the
"cross" was actually as popularly depicted? There is no biblical
information that the means of execution looks like a lower-case "t".
Many Roman crucifixes were single posts, or even posts "tied" to other
God alone will sort us out, and to second
guess Him is blasphemy. The best we can do is love God, and love
our neighbor. To quibble over minutiae is dangerous. "We"
do not make God judge by earthly rules, He judges by His own. Live and
let live, introduce the Good News if possible. All other gum
flapping is just that.
I realize that this will never be
responded to, nor will it appear on your web site. I hope that my
understanding of the Truth may be enough to cause you to at least
further meditate upon the actions which you have set in motion.
Just in case the Christian God is listening, I am a actually an
agnostic. However, I still feel that to have invoked the Lord's
name in my quasi serious post may be blasphemous. Just in case, I wink
and smile at the end of most every sentence, and give a "thumbs up" to
"the Man" (er, God).
A. We have chosen
to respond/comment upon these two letters at the same time because they
share one common thread: They accurately reflect the perception the multitude
errors Catholics incur in the practice of our Faith. If we were going
to have one single answer to both letters it would be: Based on what
you perceive, yes, you are right. On the other hand, based on what it
really should be
you are not right.
Therefore - the first comment that we shall make is: Thank you for
writing; Thank you for your sincerity and Thank you for the opportunity
that you have given us to help clear the air.
It is obvious that GCrazy9 has not read many of our documents
by his statement: "You people have a
smidgen of Biblical understanding and a glut of
goulash of Biblical ideas, most of them not coming even close to
accuracy, or truth." We have already referred him to
which he has obviously
missed while recommending him
to become better informed
before launching a verbal attack. Let
us not make the nonexistent Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction -
"Oops!" - a way of life.
Regarding to the Virgin Mary - the Mother of Jesus Christ - thus the
Mother of God (but not the Primary Cause
- since That
is God, The
Father). Unfortunately, Catholics have idolized Her in practice and the
Shepherds have not corrected such behavior. The Catholic Faith -
in its pure state - honors and reveres Mary but does not "adore" Her.
Although conceived without the original sin (the sin that we inherited
from Adam and Eve), She is a human being like all of us - except in sin.
We also frequently encounter in the improper practice of Catholicism
the "adoration" of statues or icons of Mary.
This is so widespread - especially in Europe - that we find it
extremely disturbing and distracting. Statues and icons are
be used as we use pictures and statues of loved ones and/or those we
wish to honor in a grand scale (a statue in a park, etc.) - as a
reminder BUT NOT the object of adoration/devotion. When said objects
become the focal point of the prayer, etc., we have fallen into full
By the time (7th Century) the Prophet
Mohammed was sent by
remind and correct Christians and Jews about their wayward ways -
well into the erroneous road of idolizing images, icons AND people!
This was the beginning of the Catholic Church and the Pope becoming the
our faith instead of keeping
God as the ONLY object of our Faith.
The "problem" with the cross does not lie far from this situation.
After all - it was under the Sign of the Cross that the Roman
Catholics slaughtered the Eastern Catholics when they sacked
Constantinople or when they slaughtered the residents of Jerusalem -
Muslims: mostly women and children - to recuperate Jerusalem for
Christendom (never mind that the Catholics abandoned Jerusalem to begin
with and settled in the seat of the Roman Empire to pray in Latin
instead of staying in Jerusalem to pray in Aramaic) - a monumental
blasphemy against God.
However, because of the countless betrayals to the Goodness of God
those who claim to act in His behalf (killing, maiming and sacking AND
NOT forgiving), we cannot rescind the mystical value and meaning of the
cross; a meaning that cannot be equated with an electric chair or the
gallows. Both of these instruments are used to kill those who rather
not die. That is - they are dragged to their death "kicking and
screaming": An involuntary death.
The cross, with or without the body, should remind us of Love and not
death and hate as Mel Gibson has tried to do. Jesus voluntarily died
for us because He loves us and wants to give us the opportunity (this
is not automatic) to spend Eternity with Him. Something that we
frankly find quite appealing: Spend an Eternity with someone who
loves me so much, miserable as I am, that was willing to suffer and die
just to give that opportunity - an opportunity which I did not have
before. We could not think of a better "traveling partner".
In addition - the cross has the mystical component - which was first
revealed to man through Moses. We read in Numbers 21: 5-9:
21:5 And the people spake against God, and against
Moses, Wherefore have ye brought us up out of Egypt to die in the
wilderness? for there is no bread, neither is there any water; and our
soul loatheth this light bread. Nu 21:6
And the Lord sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel
21:7 Therefore the people came to Moses, and said, We
have sinned, for we have spoken against the Lord, and against thee;
pray unto the Lord, that he take away the serpents from us. And Moses
prayed for the people. Nu 21:8 And
the Lord said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole: and it shall come to
pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall
21:9 And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it
upon a pole, and it came to pass, that if a serpent had bitten any man,
when he beheld the serpent of
brass, he lived.
"serpent" = "sin" ; "dead serpent on a pole" = "dead sin on a pole" ;
"Jesus died for our sins on a cross" = "dead sin on a cross".
look/contemplate/accept/love Him on the cross - we can be "cured"
(inspired to conversion) and
not "die", a death which is final, if it is entered in mortal sin and
rejecting the Mercy and Salvific power afforded by the
Passion-Death-and-Resurrection of Jesus (this rejection is the much
talked about "Sin against the Holy Spirit").
Historically, the Romans crucified thousands utilizing a basic cross
design. Without a doubt, for "entertainment" - a la Abu Ghraib prison
in Baghdad, they used other means to torture and kill their
enemies. However, it seems
that there is a consensus that a typical/basic cross was used for the
crucifixion of Jesus. Why argue with that? As you wrote, P: "To quibble over
minutiae is dangerous." Or
is it that it depends whose "minutiae" we quibble about?
The movement to remove the cross has a mystical hidden symbolism which
"Deny the cross". We would not recommend doing so. Invoking the same
caution as in your PS: "Just in case" that God prefers a cross,
shall stick with the cross. However, if you do not prefer to wear
it or venerate it - we accept that, as you surely would accept us
wearing it and venerating it and adore Whom it represents.
Keep in mind, P, you may be wrong on the issue of the cross as you were
when you stated: "I
realize that this will never be responded to, nor will it appear on
your web site."
May God Bless you both richly!
From B @ USA
[Published on October 13,
I ask a favor of you please. I am not certain if the enclosed article
is 100% true as to what Catholics believe about Halloween or not. Could
you please read this article and let me know your thoughts. I'm
confused because some of it sounds very anti-Catholic but I''m not
sure. I would like to forward this article on to my prayer group.
Thank you so very much.
benefit of the readers at large, following are some quotes from the
Rev. Theresa Quinto
Pavone TEACHING ON
HALLOWEEN - Copyrighted 1997
not celebrate Halloween because its customs and practices come from
an ancient, pagan (Celtic) festival of the dead.
Therefore to participate in Halloween is to serve the devil; Christians
should not celebrate Halloween because pagans and satanists still
observe it today as an - holy day;....
-- While the Roman Catholic Church Christianized the "Vigil of Samhain"
on November 1 and called it "All Souls Day" or "All Saints Day" as it
is sometimes called today, the satanist religion claimed it for their
hallowed eve. Coincidental? No. The Roman Catholics as Christians, felt
that if they could not stop the pagans from celebrating their
festivals, that they (the Catholic Church) would include them.
Hence the old vantage, "if you can't fight them, join them" comes in....
1997 Rev. Theresa Quinto Pavone, instructor
M+G+R Foundation Comments
Yes, the roots of Halloween may be found in ancient pagan
practices. No, we
do not recommend the "celebration" of Halloween any more than we would
"celebrate" the anniversary of Roe vs Wade when taken as a law
Yes. The Roman
Catholic Church Christianized this pagan rite, as it did with many
others, to assist the new and/or potential converts in the transition
from paganism to Christianity. This was done by instituting the Feast
of All Saints on November 1st - celebrating the Saints already in
Heaven and the Memorial of All Souls on November 2nd - seeking the
prompt release of the souls which are still in Purgatory.
When she writes "if you can't fight
them, join them", we
do not think that she meant that the Roman Catholic Church just changed
the names and continued the same pagan rites.
Unfortunately, as the
saying goes: "The way to
is paved with good intentions.", (*) and the
All Saints and All Souls days did not become popular and replaced the
old pagan mentality. This is another by-product of the failed
Evangelization of the Roman Catholic Church which was, and still is,
more intent in
temporal power than in spiritual power.
out evil since
satan is the Prince of this world. Only engaging the power of God, as
it was originally done, evil can be rooted out. Result: The
of Halloween persistent and now it is being spread to every nation
which "we have liberated" by means of aggressive consumerism.
St. Michael, the
Archangel, defends us in the day of
battle. Be our safeguard against the wickedness and snares of the
devil. May God rebuke him, we humbly pray, and do thou, Prince of
the Heavenly Hosts, by the
power of God thrust into hell satan and all the evil
spirits which prowl through the world seeking the ruin of souls.
(*) Like the frequent invocation of
"prudence" by The Vatican to protect the Church at the expense of the
From BW @ USA
[Published on October 9,
did read the note added on Oct. 5 on your How to Vote Document.
Even after re-reading it I still thought you were encouraging that
Catholic to vote for Mr. Kerry. I am not always able to discern
your writing, sorry, and I am sometimes unable to clearly express what
I want to communicate. (Yes, I realize that that is part of
But our bishops are clearly NOT leading us and haven't been for a
...The average Catholic who accepts things at face value may not
realize that "remote material cooperation" is STILL a grave evil - and
unfortunately once again the clear issue is muddied by our church
I realize that you usually don't directly answer - that you want us to
think and pray - but still feel that your page is saying it's ok to
If I have misunderstood your page, I apologize. If I do
understand it, I beg you to rethink your answer.
We ARE NOT recommending anyone to vote for Kerry, for Bush or whomever.
We are trying to
people how to
access God on-direct (on this matter and all others) since the
Shepherds are too busy taking care of their very,
We fully endorse the
concluding statement from Cardinal Ratzinger:
N.B. A Catholic would be guilty of formal
cooperation in evil, and so unworthy to present himself for Holy
Communion, if he were to deliberately vote for a candidate precisely
because of the candidate's permissive stand
on abortion and/or euthanasia. When a Catholic does not share a
candidate's stand in favour of abortion and/or
euthanasia, but votes for that candidate for other reasons, it is
considered remote material cooperation, which
can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.
Read: Kerry may be
barred from communion but a citizen may vote for him "for other
reasons" and it will then be considered remote material cooperation,
which can be permitted.... etc. etc.
We wish we could do more at this time but there are 6 billion other
people out there who also fall under our tutelage. God is the Father
of all - not only of Catholics - and others are in far worse spiritual
condition that Catholics are today.
We are neither at the service of the Church nor at the service of man.
We are the service of that Father, then, as a result, we are
service of man. That is the order of priorities set by God in the
First and Second Commandments. Those are the priorities we follow.
We are happy that we have been able to serve you in the past.
May the Holy Spirit of God continue to guide you.
From LR @ USA
[Published on October 7,
2004 - Feast of Our Lady of the Rosary]
am 56. I was married in 1971 in the Sacrament of Marriage at my
Catholic Church. Ten years later I knew I was gay. I didn't
feel it was fair to my husband, who I still loved, to keep him
married when it wasn't his fault. I left with much sadness and
much disgust from many relatives.
I couldn't understand why I was welcomed at the altar rail on one
day and the next day when I felt I had to tell the truth about
my orientation, I was no longer welcomed. I knew in my heart that
I still believe in my Lord Jesus Christ.
I knew He would never have turned me away from his table. I
have been in a 23 year committed relationship with another woman,
who also had a strong love our Lord. Over the years
we became celibate, still strongly loving each other. We
couldn't lie about who we were.
Then I had a great gift from the Holy Spirit, Who I pray to as
much as to God the Father, His Son Jesus Christ, and Mary His
mother. I knew my Lord and His Blessed Mother had not turned away
The Gift of The Holy Spirit allowed me to use my being gay as a
way to know when my Lord was not truly worshiped in some peoples
hearts. It gave me a new way to assess behavior. I knew
when I go to Heaven I will neither be male nor female. I
know it will be compassion and love that will mean the
I know that many people are fooled by George W. Bush as he claims
to be a moral man who worships God. I don't doubt that he
prays daily as I pray for him daily. People turn away from Kerry
believing that he approves of abortion. He believes in
"choice". He would prefer that the woman and her mate not have
the abortion, but he wants to protect her right to have a choice
that is between herself and her Lord.
I have been listening to the Republican convention and I have
been so afraid that George Bush will win. I was heart broken
4 years ago when he won the election. Why can't people see by his
actions how much hate and lies he can tell. They believe in him.
I have had to face much prejudice
over the years, have been told to my face I should be in a
concentration camp. I am afraid. I know that God is
in control, but I am still afraid if Bush gets in it will push us
closer to God's wrath. How can I view this in another way.
I pray, but my fear is still there. Thank you for the time you
take to read this. My Our Lord continue to bless you with
LJR from USA
A. No. This is not political propaganda. As we have
stated before - We are not concerned about politics any more than our
Lord Jesus Christ and John the Baptizer were nearly 2000 years
ago. HOWEVER, when a politician starts claiming that he/she acts
in the Name or on behalf of God, it is the function of miguel de Portugal to step in.
all: I, miguel de Portugal, do not recognize Mr. George W. Bush
as an agent, representative or servant of God. In his innocence
believe so and people utilizing him may want him to believe so, but
If the faithful would take the time to carefully and prayerfully review
this poor frightened woman's letter in the light of our
homosexuality and the tremendous importance that nourishing the
seeking soul with Living Bread has, it should not be difficult to
discern who truly is behind denying the Holy Communion to those who in
earnest seek to rise in the Light of the Lord.
It is to the Glory of God, their true
and the loving hearts of
LJR and her companion that, even being profoundly in love with each
other, they lead a celibate life.
We see more love, more true Christianity and submission to the Divine
Will in L and B's lives than we see amongst those who populate the
church pews and consider
themselves the true guardians and believers of
the Faith - clergy included!
From MA @ USA
[Published on September 29,
been reading your website for a few months and I find it to be very
interesting and enlightening most of the time. Would you call yourself
a prophet or someone that's just more in tune with the Holy Spirit than
most of us? And do you live in Portugal because "the dogma of faith
will always be preserved"?
Also - There are so many
prophecies, and I pray that I believe the right ones, I have
noticed that some of the Protestant prophecies coincide with some of
the Catholic ones, like the "Warning", but yet I can't find the Warning
in Revelations. If it's the trumpets, why doesn't it say anything about
a huge spiritual awakening in that chapter, did I miss it? I don't want
to depend on the prophecies, I want to depend on the Holy Bible.
God Bless you,
A. It is not for miguel
de Portugal to state who he is
or whose shoes does he occupy at the End of These Times. God will
reveal that to whomever He Wills and whenever He Wills it.
Indeed we all must depend on the Holy Bible as a Fount of Living
Waters. Prophecies are
mostly warnings given by God, directly and indirectly, to assist
in minimizing the suffering that awaits it if it does not change
its evil ways. Therefore, it is more important to prayerfully study and
implement (in one's lives) the Word of God than to be chasing around
for the latest prophecy.
Prophecies from different
faiths coincide in many instances. This
occurs even across major Faith lines. It may come as a shock to
religious fanatics but... God is the Father of each one of us - Jews,
Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, Muslims and, yes, Pagans too! Isn't He
going to try to bring them back to the fold on His own since organized
religion is more concerned with perpetuating itself than being a bridge
between man and God?
The "Warning" has been
announced in the Scriptures (and not necessarily
in the Book of Revelations). Let God show you in His Own time and in
His Own loving way.
From KD @ USA
[Published on September 26,
have often wondered what Jesus meant when He said "heaven and earth
will pass away, but my words will not pass away." Did Jesus mean
heaven will not last throughout eternity? Thank you for
considering my question.
The "heaven and earth" which "will pass away" and about which He is
speaking of, are the "old ones" and about which we read in
the Book of Revelations [21:1] as
being renewed. We
will take this one step further...
When the last 1,000 years spoken of in the Holy Scriptures [Rev 20] - the same period about which the Vatican continues
to trip over trying to explain it and not contradict themselves -
are concluded [Rev 21:1]
- which should be on or about the year
2,832 A.D. - the created universe will cease to exist. Its purpose
would have been fulfilled.
With the Final Judgment behind us, we should then live Eternally with
God in the new "heaven and earth", in which, if you notice,
logically "...the sea was no more." These "new heaven and
earth", which are Eternal, are also created as the "old ones" by the
Word of God, Which Is Jesus Christ Who, of course, Is Eternal.
We pray that we have not confused you. For additional information about
"Time and Eternity" you may want to review
From VS @ USA
[Published on September 22,
could you put a sinner, spreading all kinds of lies and sin on your
page? You may be used by the Devil I suppose because we are
close to the end of the world. I'll pray for your
VS is referring to a private note sent only to those in our
list. We chose to do so since we presumed that our regular readership
surely knew exactly where
we stood. Obviously many of them still do
not. Therefore, we have chosen to respond to some of their comments in
the Public Forum for the benefit of all. This is the second
A. Thank you for your prayers.
Regarding your communication: For your peace of mind, we recommend
that you pay closer attention to what we say, who to, how and what for.
Please read the Note above as well as the response to JA dated
Next: When will you people realize and accept that God is
above all and satan must serve Him too? Nothing
can occur in this
Universe unless God allows it!
We have illustrated this clearly a number of times through some of our
documents, i.e., Regarding
Mental Reprogramming, where an obvious enemy
of God published, and we then distribute far and wide, how they
attack, with the intent of destroying,
Regarding to the article you specifically refer to - and which was
circulated ONLY those those we thought knew where we stood, and that
obviously does not include you: He highlighted very well the serious
problems that we saw in Gibson's version of the Passion of Christ. If
one needs raw gore to learn to love Christ - he/she has a very real
problem. That is not love, that is guilt and oppressing
guilt is not of
In better days, the best suspense movies were by Alfred Hitchcock.
Seldom a drop of blood was seen in those movies, yet, some of them were
terrifying. That was good suspense technique. Now the public is fed
blood and gore because
subconsciously they crave such deviant stimulus.
What Mr. Gibson did was to feed that subconscious and disordered desire
for blood and gore. God does not need that for His children to
love Him. What kind of a god is that? That would be typical of a pagan
god - the god most commonly
adored by humanity today.
We will take this one step further and give you and all a little
glimpse as to how that movie will be utilized towards the end.
In the near
future, when the FalseChrist (not the AntiChrist!) is about to make his
entrance, clips from Gibson's movie will be used as subliminal
brainwashing, inducing guilt so that the disoriented sheep will be more
pliable to accept the FalseChrist.
Why? Because the FalseChrist will
not be able to inspire love - which is an intangible feeling that only
God can give us, thus, in the absence of love - guilt will be
that the False Christ is "loved".
No, Mr. Gibson does not know that - he is just another willing
instrument, fueled by
fanaticism, preparing the stage for the False
And finally. How many times do we have to repeat that we ARE NOT approaching the end of the
world. That is precisely what satan wants people to believe so that
they despair. Obviously you have fallen for that trap. We are approaching the END of THESE TIMES
and NOT the World!
We shall now return the favor and pray for you.
From PC @ USA
[Published on September 19,
is it that we pray for Divine Mercy on the world and at the same time
hope for and pray for the Divine Justice (the
Great Purge) to happen?
Always questioning my motives,
The Hopeful One
From AQ @ Australia
[Published on September 19,
can I do about:
Priests saying Sister and Brothers, (not
Brothers and Sisters);
Priests not doing the Commingling;
Priests wearing only the Stole;
Priests (offering peace) shaking hands with all and saundry;
Priests refuse to give communion on the tongue.
These have been done at each and
every mass for some three months while our own priest is on
holyday. We are forced to go elsewhere to various Churches.
Yours in Christ
A. First of
Immediately start offering prayers and sacrifices directed at these
type of priests. Invocation - "We/I offer (this) as an act of
reparation for the sins
and offenses that XYZ have committed for which Divine
Justice demands reparation before God can work the pleasure of His
Mercy in XYZ soul(s)".
How this works - or as much as m de
Portugal is able to explain in human terms - is
explained in SUFFERING
: MANKIND'S PARTICIPATION IN ITS OWN REDEMPTION
The following document, Redemptionis
Sacramentum, explains in
great detail and very clearly how the Sacrifice of the Holy Mass MUST
be offered. It
also gives specific
instructions to the faithful on how to
proceed (all the way up to the CONGREGATION FOR DIVINE WORSHIP AND THE DISCIPLINE OF THE
SACRAMENT) if the procedure is
Do not let any human being stand between
you and God and His
Sacraments! As you can see, He has seen to it that multiple recourses
are available to the Faithful to correct was is wrong.
From B @ USA
[Published on September 16,
you please tell me what is meant by the "deposit of grace"? The context
in which I am speaking about the "deposit of grace" would be when Our
Lord ascended into Heaven the basic structure of the Church was
By His death He merited for us the graces of salvation. My son's 8th
grade religion book is stating that we call this the "deposit of grace"
which is dispensed to us through the sacraments of the church.
Thank you so much.
A. The only one who could be considered - stretching the
concept - "deposit of Grace" would Mary, Who, by being Full Of Grace is
empowered by God to dispense them. Something She made very clear during
Her Apparitions at Rue de Bac, France, (the
the Miraculous Medal), and something which m de Portugal knows, not
The Church, through the Sacraments,
which we do not tire to
extoll, bestow upon the faithful Graces;
however, the Graces are of and from God and not the Church - regardless
of what claims its Administrators may make.
Those Graces are not a requirement for
salvation - true faith in Jesus Christ as the Saviour of mankind and
the reality of His Resurrection, are the ultimate requirements.
However, those Graces are a tremendous gift
because they provide supernatural
assistance as we journey through time
- which, as most humans know - has become a veritable mine field.
In very simple 8th Grade terms. The Graces are like water from God and
the Church is like the pipeline utilized by God to get His water to the
faithful. As you can see - there is no "deposit" in this system, except
Mary, Who could be seen as a water reservoir - between the "source"
(God) and the "end user" (the faithful) with the Divine Granted
freedom to route it to whomever She deems merits it.
We pray that we have made it clear enough.
From LJR @ USA
[Published on September 9,
Comment I'M SURE MANY OF US JUST
CANNOT BELIEVE IN A
NUCLEAR DISASTER IN THE USA, just as we couldn't believe anyone
could cause 9/11. When reading about it in this public forum we can
easily set it aside because the '"M+G+R may be overly sensitive to
disaster". Today I tuned into a program on Public Radio out of
Washington, DC. I don't know the guest but his name was Graham Allison.
I believe the Holy Spirit was giving us an open warning well
publicized by a Public Radio broadcast. He talked of all the ways
a Holocaust could happen, stating a bomb so small that it could
fit in a backpack can now produce a blast the size of Hiroshima.
Our elected officials focused our attention on Iraq... instead of
working toward resolution. This web site has told us many
times the multiple reasons why our officials should want to do
Mr. Allison stated what actions could be taken by nations to avoid
this. He stated we need to treat the nuclear problem like
GOLD. The USA and Russia both have wealth that is so strongly
guarded no one can get to the gold. (1) Lock down the nukes, with
the USA and Russia leading by example just as they protect their
gold. (2) Negotiate with all other nations to do the same.
(3) No loose nukes. An example was North Korea who sells nukes
I thank our Lord for making such a public announcement through media
that can reach many. Obviously He can no longer trust the
Catholic Religion to do it.
M+G+R Foundation, please, please continue to do your mission. It
is up to the rest of us to make the changes. My prayers
continue for all. Thank you.
A. Your kind
words Glorify God Whom we strive to serve.
Our posting in the News
Commentary today should make even the deadest
of Zombies begin to realize that we have not been issuing these
warnings since 1991 (first, through individual communications to those
whose decision moved millions of people into action, and then through
our Domains too) to "fill an empty life". We take this opportunity to
remind one and all, again, that miguel
de Portugal had a real life (a
life as most people on this world will never know first hand) when God
called Him away to start issuing these warnings with plenty of advance
Now, time is
just about out.
From JA @ USA
[Published on September 8,
2004 - Birthday of the Blessed Virgin Mary]
this the same Matthew Fox that was
defrocked and is a new ager????
JA is referring to a private note sent only to those in our mailing
list. We chose to do so since we presumed that our regular readership
surely knew exactly where
we stood. Obviously many of them still do
not. Therefore, we have chosen to respond to some of their comments in
the Public Forum for the benefit of all. This is the first
A. We have been informed that Matthew Fox is the former
Dominican RC priest who left the RCC rather than obey an order to be
silent, and he became an Episcopal priest in 1994 under Bishop
Swing. He is famous for the notions of "creation spirituality"
and "original blessing," and for offering syncretic, but drug-free,
"techno cosmic masses."
First of all, because we privately shared a
document authored by him, does not necessarily mean that we agree with
everything else he stands for, such as: Notions of
"creation spirituality" and "original blessing," and for offering
syncretic, but drug-free, "techno cosmic masses."
Those who have been with us for some time
know that we have on-line (it was temporarily withdrawn to be soon
reinstated) probably the
best exposé of the New Age movement
authored by Lee Penn with our explanation of its ultimate objective.
Secondly, the fact that Fox was defrocked
- in today's Church - is almost a badge of merit. After all, most of
the thousands of priests who physically
spiritually raped our
children have not been defrocked and neither have the Bishops and
Cardinals who were accessories of their crimes by promoting, by the
actions, the rape of our children.
If that were not enough, Law - one of the
worst offenders - has been placed in charge of the most important
Marian Basilica of the world - St. Mary Major, in Rome. That is an
abomination, an attack on the Catholic Faith and an insult to Mary.
May the Holy Spirit of God Illuminate you, brethren of the Hierarchy.
You have precious little
time left before the Invoice is presented and God has promised me,
through Psalm 91, that "A thousand
may fall at my side, ten thousand at my right hand, but it will not
come near me. I will only observe with my eyes and see the punishment
of the wicked."
From PD and MAK @
[Published on August 28, 2004]
How could you encourage your readers to vote for Mr. Kerry, a man
only votes for abortion and stem cell research from aborted
Q-2. I don't agree with the
your referred to me on How to Vote and think he's off base,
particularly when he says if the person feels as she does she should go
ahead and vote for Kerry and let God stop her if it's against His will.
That is nonsensical! We are called to use our God-given judgment
to use it. That means making the effort to gather the facts and
make intelligent assessments of them.
By the way, I am not a Bush fan and do not intend to vote for
him. But Kerry has disqualified himself from consideration by his
evil positions. Real Catholics cannot vote for him. MAK
thank both of you for this great opportunity to clarify some points
that obviously were not made clear in said document.
First of all, we are not telling anyone
how to vote as the clergy often do from the pulpit in open defiance of
the teachings of Jesus Christ, on Whose behalf they claim to act. We
are attempting to help His children find their way back to Him by
understanding "how the Heavenly system works" so to speak.
Since we do not believe in any kind of
war nor capital punishment - if the faithful wishes to take "death" as the only "Yay" or "Nay"
point of reference to make a voting decision - we would say - stay at
home or nominate and vote for a candidate who truly upholds the
teachings of Jesus Christ.
Now regarding the statement from MAK "...
if the person feels as she does, she should go ahead and vote for Kerry
and let God stop her if it's against His will. That is
are called to use our God-given judgment to use it. "
Please note that in the How To Vote
Document, miguel de Portugal wrote: "If I were in your particular
This is clearly meant to convey to the
reader that the response on how to act would be only applicable to
those who are truly His people. He will never allow any of His
own to make a mistake unless it is the only way, with minimum
detrimental consequences, that that particular child of His is to learn
a very important lesson (and wouldn't you want to make that
mistake?). And who are His own?
"My mother and my brothers are those who hear the word of God and put
it into practice."
Somehow those self righteous, traditionalist, orthodox, right
wing activist, holders-of-the-truth, etc. Catholics take it for granted
that "they are part of God's inner circle" while they blatantly ignore
what Jesus, through Luke (see above) taught us.
Then, when they hear...
know you not, whence you are". Then you shall begin to say: "We
have eaten and drunk in thy presence: and thou hast taught in our
streets." And he shall say to you: "I know you not, whence you
are. Depart from me, all ye workers of iniquity. There
shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth; when you shall see Abraham and
Isaac and Jacob and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God: and you
yourselves thrust out. And there shall come from the east
and the west and the north and the south: and shall sit down in the
kingdom of God. And behold, they are last that shall be first:
and they are first that shall be last." [Luke 13:26-30]
...they will be greatly surprised; but
then, it will be too late.
Brethren - everyone is being warned with
ample time for the "Claims, Complaints and Adjustments Window" in
Heaven will soon be shut down. Whether you believe miguel
or not does not increase nor decrease his merits before the Throne of
God, only doing His Will by
warnings and providing the
guidance He Wills, will do so.
to Public Forum - July/August 2004
Foundation. All rights reserved.
BOARD Listing the Latest
Updates to this Domain
PAGE - English
PAGE - Español
PAGE - Portugues
If the above dated
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to view
If you wish to contact The M+G+R
please Click Here and
You may freely reproduce and
this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as to its
(2) No changes are made in the text without prior written consent; and
(3) No charge is made for it.