(a)  Passing out condoms to prevent the spread of AIDS via sexual intercourse - and do nothing else - to save lives cannot be considered as a "means justified by the end" - because we are working against God by helping in the destruction of souls.

(b) Passing out condoms to prevent the spread of AIDS via sexual intercourse - and implement a solid Evangelization program to change the mentality of the individuals through Light and Grace - is a method of "buying time" while the leaven of the kingdom of heaven works its wonders in their souls - thus we are cooperating with God' plan for His children. [The kingdom of heaven is like to leaven, which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal, until the whole was leavened. [Matthew 13:33]]

Of course, this thinking could degenerate into a philosophical discussion about the difference or equivalence of murdering/killing with a gun, for example, and killing with an AIDS contaminated sexual liaison. However, we must keep in mind that: Death by gunshot is quick and little can be done to draw the soul to God before separation of soul and body. Death through AIDS is slow and much can be done to draw that soul to God before its separation.  Therefore - we cannot compare, nor treat alike, both methods of killing a body.

Your other questions have been answered in different documents in our pages (2).

Regarding what "does not convince a non-believer" is completely outside the responsibility of the Elect. We are to take a horse to water, drink of it so that the horse sees that it  quenches our thirst with no ill effects; then, if the horse still refuses to drink, we must allow the horse to die of thirst or at least go thirsty for a while until it realizes its error.  The Elect never were, nor will ever be, part of the Inquisition crowd.  Their technique would have been "choking the horse to death" while force feeding him water to "keep him alive".

Yes, that is how ridiculous and pathetic the alleged Evangelization has been in the last ca. 1600 years.... and stay tuned, as we have already explained, it will be tried again. (3)

_____________________________
(1) The near Apocalyptic Climatic and Geological Events Worldwide
(2) Pain is the megaphone....   ,   Divine Mercy in Action - Part I  and Part II 
(3) The striking similarity of the French Revolution with the activities "scheduled" for End of These Times

946 After confessing "the holy catholic Church," the Apostles' Creed adds "the communion of saints." In a certain sense this article is a further explanation of the preceding: "What is the Church if not the assembly of all the saints?" The communion of saints is the Church.

948 The term "communion of saints" therefore has two closely linked meanings: communion in holy things (sancta)" and "among holy persons (sancti).

956 The intercession of the saints. "Being more closely united to Christ, those who dwell in heaven fix the whole Church more firmly in holiness.... They do not cease to intercede with the Father for us, as they proffer the merits which they acquired on earth through the one mediator between God and men, Christ Jesus.... So by their fraternal concern is our weakness greatly helped."

For whosoever shall do the will of my Father, that is in heaven, he is my brother, and sister, and mother. [Matthew 12:50]

3 No, I say to you: but unless you shall do penance, you shall all likewise perish. 4 Or those eighteen upon whom the tower fell in Siloe, and slew them: think you, that they also were debtors above all the men that dwelt in Jerusalem? 5 No, I say to you; but except you do penance, you shall all likewise perish. [Luke 13]

Peace! 

As a result of our postings on Scientology we came across the following article.  Please, do note who is its author:

Thanks Tom Cruise

By Peter R. Breggin, M.D.

 

On June 25, 2005 Tom Cruise did the unthinkable on TV.   Actually, he did several "unthinkables" in a filmed interview with NBC's Matt Lauer for the Today Show.

First, Tom stopped smiling.  He deprived us of that multi-million dollar grin and got serious.   For a star to do this to the American public was unthinkable.

Second, Tom pointed out that Matt Lauer actually was very "glib" (shallow) and didn't know what he was talking about.   He also urged Matt to be "more responsible" and to learn something about psychiatry before touting it.  For a star to do this to a media personality was unthinkable.  Since nearly all of them are shallow, this was a threat of potentially epidemic proportions.  Suppose other guests began pointing out that media hosts don't know what they are talking about and are shallow?

Third, he got serious about one of the most important issues in our personal lives, in this case our widespread use of psychiatric drugs to solve our personal distress and anguish.   Tom concluded, "I'm passionate about life."  For anyone to speak this way on television, except perhaps on the Catholic channel, is truly beyond the TV pale; and even the Catholic channel doesn't criticize psychiatry.

Fourth, he criticized psychiatry and drew attention to its genuine flaws and failings.  I suspect he's actually read my book, Toxic Psychiatry.   Tom said that psychiatry had a long history of abusing people, including electroshock.  He said, "There is no such thing as a chemical imbalance."  He said that antidepressants can only "mask the problem" and that "these drugs are very dangerous."  He called psychiatry a "pseudoscience" and suggested that there are better approaches.   He was right about all of this.

A few days later NBC invited me to New York City as a psychiatric expert to discuss the Tom Cruise affair on the Today Show, and when I began by saying it sounded like Tom had been doing some serious reading about psychiatry, I got cut off, again and again, throughout the show.

Why was the media both drawn into the story and shocked by it?   It was too good a story to simply ignore: "Tom Cruise Gone Wild" was the theme.   It should have been, "Tom Cruise gets serious."

The media would have liked to attack Tom on the grounds that he's a Scientologist.   Scientologists seem to share a number of views about psychiatry with me, including everything Tom said.  In fact, I'd go further.  Modern biological psychiatry is a materialistic religion masquerading as a science.

How can I say that my profession of psychiatry is a materialistic religion?   Because modern psychiatry makes believe that psychological and spiritual problems, such as anxiety and depression, are caused by mechanical failures in the physical brain, and because psychiatry then attempts to correct these psychological and spiritual problems with physical interventions such as drugs and electroshock.   Modern biological psychiatry takes these views and implements these interventions on faith and it has won a lot of converts with the help of billion-dollar marketing campaigns.  If you want more detailed analyses of the faith and fake science behind the claims of modern psychiatry, you'll find them in my books such as Toxic Psychiatry (1991), Brain-Disabling Treatments in Psychiatry (1997), Talking Back to Ritalin (Revised, 2001), the Antidepressant Fact Book (2001) and the Ritalin Fact Book (2002). You can find my scientific papers on my website. In my books and on the web site you'll also find discussions of the many drug-free alternatives that are available for helping people with problems such as anxiety and depression.

The media kept hinting that the problem was Tom's Scientology beliefs but they didn't want to say it.  To some extent it's not politically correct to criticize someone's religion, especially when people like Tom and John Travolta are members.  But that was really not the issue.   The media is afraid of Scientology because the religion has been extremely aggressive toward media critics, often charging them or threatening to charge them with libel and slander.  

I was also invited on to CNBC's the Donny Deutche talk show.   This time I remained in Ithaca, New York only a few blocks from my office in a high tech TV studio.   I was kept waiting in front of the live camera for almost an hour and a half to get a word in as I watched Tom get excoriated.  Although I could see the show on the uplink for this entire time as I sat waiting at any moment to be called upon, they decided not to link me into the show at all and I never got to say a thing in Tom's defense or in criticism of biological psychiatry, drugs and electroshock.  Sitting upright that long without twitching in anticipation of momentarily appearing on millions of televisions was hard enough, but listening to Donny was worse.

While I sat listening to the CNBC show that I was never brought onto, I felt a mixture of outrage and sadness.  Outrage that the show host Donny Deutche bragged up his work in advertising where he helped to produce the Zoloft TV ads with their clever little bouncing faces that made the antidepressant so much more "accessible," in his words, to millions of Americans.   Donny was bragging about an actual fraud ads that falsely suggest that Zoloft corrects biochemical imbalances and that leave out the warning that the drug causes mania, not to mention psychosis, violence and suicide.

What was tragic?  Donny's guest was Jane Pauley who was flogging her new book, Out of the Blue.  Jane is the epitome of a media personality, having anchored the Today Show with Tom Brokaw and Bryant Gumbel, and having earned many broadcast awards.  Jane is also a promoter of psychiatry.   She admitted to having developed "hypomanic" (milder than full-blown mania) symptoms on an antidepressant.   At the time, she explained, her mind and thoughts were racing and she couldn't control them. But then she added that of course the drug didn't make her become manic; the drug just "brought out" her underlying or pre-existing bipolar disorder.

Of course, I don't know anything about Jane Pauley except what she's told us and she's not really the issue.   Celebrities are actively recruited by marketing departments to promote medical and psychiatric treatments.  I do know that psychiatrists often lie to patients to protect themselves and their drugs.   My colleagues lie by saying the antidepressant merely "brought out" their mania, psychosis, violence or depression, rather than the drug caused it in the otherwise innocent victim.  Jane Pauley thinks she is a victim of bipolar disorder when she sounds to me like a victim of psychiatry.

It's no small matter to falsely inform a person that their drug-induced mania shows they have bipolar disorder.   It results in a false diagnosis and a stigmatizing label (bipolar or manic-depressive disorder) that follows people for the rest of their lives.   It leads to additional medications, often including anti psychotic drugs like Zyprexa and Risperdal that can cause lethal diabetes and pancreatitis, and tardive dyskinesia, a potentially disfiguring and disabling neurological disorder characterized by bizarre-looking abnormal movements.

So the media personalities had a feast promoting their religion, psychiatry, while Tom Cruise got hammered for criticizing psychiatry, and indirectly promoting his religion, Scientology.

No, I'm not a Scientologist.   Except when they occasionally say hello to me at conferences, I have hardly spoken to a Scientologist in more than thirty years.  But when I saw Tom's bravery come out from behind his marvelous smile, I wanted to help, and I made clear I wanted to defend him.

Well, Tom, you said on TV things I've been saying in the media and in my books and scientific articles for three decades but boy did you generate a lot more attention to the issues.   Thanks!

MSNBC Original News Report on event

A. Confusing is not the word - it is worse than following a chess game in three dimensions plus one - time. We publish that information (1) for two reasons: (a) Those who can follow it will have a 'ring side seat' to the Apocalypse and will see how it all unfolds; (b) To clearly indicate the ties between men of "Faith", so to speak, and the political maneuvering in the world which has nothing to do with God and which will be used to spring the False Christ upon an unsuspecting humanity.

Understanding certainly IS NOT a condition for Salvation but it will affect the level (2) of future suffering if one is moved to increase one's prayer life. Each one of you will understand it when and how God determines it is time for it to be understood, not when miguel wants.

What we exhort people to do, indeed, is to Pray and allow the Will of God to guide their every step (3). There can be no failure with that.

A. No, you are not in denial. (4) Although you are indeed surrounded by a horrific darkness you are not really bothered by it. Why should you be? Explaining it in material terms: You find yourself in the darkness of nights, a night without a moon BUT wearing night vision goggles.  In spiritual terms the "night vision goggles" are nothing else that Having the Holy Spirit of God in residence in your heart and guiding your every step. When the Holy Spirit of God guides our every step - why should we worry?  Why else would you "...talk to my adult children and grandchildren about the importance of living in the state of grace, being thankful to God and the Blessed Mother for every single thing and trying to be loving persons." unless you had internal illumination?

This is why we keep calling for a single minded effort develop a real, working and intimate relation with the Holy Spirit of God. (5)

A. And that IS precisely why, even though you recognize that you are submerged in total darkness, you are are to lead a normal life. But we are called arrogant and evil by those whose control of other human beings, through codependency, (6)  is threatened by what we recommend in the Name of God.

A. That is one of the reasons for which we exist. The only things that you need to keep doing.... is what you are doing - always striving to draw closer to God and fulfill His Will (not what we want His Will to be (7)) at every turn.

A. Through your actions you are Evangelizing those around you by example. The moment the expected major global events and catastrophes take place most of those seeds of Evangelization you are planting "here and there" will sprout to full bloom so fast that it will surprise you. Those which will not - were never intended to bloom regardless of what you or anyone else would have done.

Even this letter is an act of Evangelization. As we answer your questions, questions which are shared by many, many who may not even be aware that they have the same questions and concerns or are unable to express them, you are causing their illumination because, if we did not have your letter to answer, we would not be writing this now in the Name of God.

A. God gave you a concrete confirmation of what we explained to you above.

A. And we praise God for your progress and the opportunity He gave us to help thousands upon thousands through the answering of your letter.

Ye men of Israel, take heed to yourselves what you intend to do, as touching these men. 36 For before these days rose up Gamaliel, affirming himself to be somebody, to whom a number of men, about four hundred, joined themselves: who was slain; and all that believed him were scattered, and brought to nothing. 37 After this man, rose up Judas of Galilee, in the days of the enrolling, and drew away the people after him: he also perished; and all, even as many as consented to him, were dispersed. 38 And now, therefore, I say to you, refrain from these men, and let them alone; for if this council or this work be of men, it will come to nought; 39 But if it be of God, you cannot overthrow it, lest perhaps you be found even to fight against God. [Acts 5]

....He will save me from the fowler's snare and from the deadly pestilence. He will cover me with His feathers, and under His wings I will find refuge; His faithfulness will be my shield and rampart....

....A thousand may fall at my side, ten thousand at my right hand, but it will not come near me. [Psalm 91]

We are quite familiar with "the aura scene" and  probably 20 years ago stopped paying attention to it. This does not deny their reality, the problem is that when we "feed" our ability of seeing anything in the supernatural domain we are falling back to reliance on our physical senses.

Our objective should be to "fly by instruments only" - the guidance of the Holy Spirit of God and see, with our physical eyes, nothing of the supernatural - unless, of course, God Wills that we do see This or That.

While in prayer I realized that we had not explained why we stated: "... the problem is that when we "feed" our ability of seeing anything in the supernatural domain we are falling back to reliance on our physical senses. Our objective should be to "fly by instruments only" -..."

satan can mimic any information coming through our physical senses. he cannot, however, mimic the "readings" of the Holy Spirit of God when It has become our Guiding Light.

That is - the most convincing visual rendition staged by satan - auras included - can be "seen" as false through our "flight by instruments only" mechanism.  This is precisely why most will fall in the False Christ snare since the Faith of most is intellectual and not spiritual.

This is exactly what He meant when He said:   Jesus saith to him: Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and have believed. John 20:29

In reference to your mailing about the seemingly common practice of burying a statue of St. Joseph in the yard to sell one's house...


IW

A. First of all, we value your sincerity in sharing this with us since you well know that we "talk straight" just as our Lord and Master did (1).

Secondly, when in our mailing, one read: Today's Mass reading warns us that you cannot serve God and mammon. it referred to the Blue Army promoting such concept and not about the users who are just victims of what the Church, which was originally founded by Jesus Christ, turned into (2).  We are not surprised - Aaron set the pace - we can read about it in Exodus 32. Somewhere along the line the Church Administrators and those who follow what is not of God did not get to the end of that chapter wherein we read: And I, in the day of revenge, will visit this sin also of theirs. The Lord therefore struck the people for the guilt on occasion of the calf which Aaron had made.

In reference to your mailing... (1)

 

Today's Gospel Reading [Luke 16: 19-31] reminds us why most will not believe you.

 

The rich man did not "get it" since he was not a Child of God.  God's Children can hear Him when He calls.  God's Children are not without fault, but when the time comes, they will get the message, if for no other reason than God insists that they do; whatever it takes, God will get them to listen.

 

In the case of the rich man and his brothers, not only did he and they ignore Moses and the prophets, but truly, they would not have believed even if a man rose from the dead to tell them the truth.

 

The rich man and his brothers would insist that the risen man was "not a face they recognized" and that that same man lived in "an alternate reality."

 

God either gives one the light or He condemns one to the darkness.  If God will not give one the Grace to see, it will not happen.

 

For the Children of God, they know, not believe, that Miguel is right.  The end of Our Times is anticlimactic at this point.  We know enough to know how it ends, the details are best left to God.

 

Peace and Best wishes!

 

 Now, let us "fast forward" to the Gospel according to John, Chapters 11 and 12. Jesus raised a dead and already decomposing Lazarus almost at the gates of Jerusalem.  There were many witnesses and many people were converted when they witnessed Lazarus resurrection. A little later we see that Jesus dined with Lazarus and sisters in His way to Jerusalem where He would be crucified in about six days.

In spite of the astonishing miracle He had performed at the gates of Jerusalem, He was crucified because "... neither will they believe, if one rise again from the dead."

Perfect Divine coherence in the Holy Scriptures.

Thank you for the opportunity to Glorify God.

________________________________
(1) The mailing....

Quote from news report:


Comments:



News report: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jw3wdrz2Xcr0w6_08h5xoTucdQXwD8RV07F01

PAGE of INTRODUCTION to DOMAIN

HOME PAGE

HOME PAGE - Español

HOME PAGE - Portugues

Back Up HOME PAGE

To Search for Information Within Our Domain Click Here

Index of Documents Sorted by File Name