The
Environmental Manifesto Laudato Si
Has Confirmed...
The Identity of "Pope" Francis
As Another Version of "Pope"
Benedict XVI
Originally
published on June 18, 2015
PURPOSE
The purpose of this brief document is
to help those members of the Elect who are still victims of their own
blindness and
deafness, as the result of their endemic denial, to see and hear
what they must, thus minimize the suffering which they will experience
as the volume of God's Megaphone of God (1) increases.
As we have explained many times, the souls of the Elect will be saved
no matter how much they resist it. The greater their resistance,
the
greatest the effort from God so that they turn to Him before body and
soul separation, thus the greater the pain they will have to endure
before turning to Him. (1)
BACKGROUND
As it is in many instances of the
interaction of the natural and supernatural realms, God uses the
appropriate symbolism so that the humans who must understand what He
Wills do so with a minimum of difficulty.
Since Cardinal Ratzinger's resignation as "Pope" Benedict XVI and the
installation of Cardinal Bergoglio as "Pope" Francis, we have been
alerting the world that Bergoglio is essentially a Ratzinger repackaged
to make his End of These Times actions more acceptable by the
uninformed faithful, who are mostly ignorant of the Divine teachings
and warnings found in the
Holy Scriptures.
Now, thanks be to God, the ultra Catholic and pro Opus Dei news
publication
- CRUX - has proclaimed it thus:
Environmental
manifesto may confirm Pope Francis as "Benedict 2.0" (2)
INTRODUCTION
What has tipped the Ratzinger-Bergoglio
mono-duet has been "Pope" Francis' encyclical letter on the
environment, Laudato Si. In
the article published in CRUX (1) one can read:
[our highlights]
Mythology and media narratives to the
contrary, Pope Francis has far more in common with Pope Benedict XVI
than whatever separates them. Francis probably could be better
understood as “Benedict 2.0,” supplying
a warmer and more populist package for the same basic positions espoused by his more cerebral predecessor.
Through the history of salvation, Francis said, God has led the
Church progressively from "ambiguities" to "certainties." Close
your eyes, and you easily
could have believed you were hearing Benedict XVI.
In most of the ways that matter, what's changed from Benedict to
Francis isn't the lyrics, but the music. Instead of Wagner, people
today seem to hear a saucy Latin rhythm when Francis speaks, often
making the message easier to accept and share.
This brings to mind the mythical Golem
(3) which
is:
"... a creature
made out of clay... (using) mystical powers based on the esoteric
knowledge of how God created Adam..."
The man-like creature allegedly
functioned as an automaton,
activated by writing a specific series of letters on parchment and
placing the paper in the Golem's mouth - rather like inserting a
floppy disk or CD into a computer. Removing a key letter (or the
whole parchment) would deactivate it. Depending on the source one
reads,
a Golem could be mute or could be able to speak.
Interestingly enough, as we have
pointed out in our publication about Ratzinger's Ancestry, he has
a direct line of Jewish ancestry on his mother's side,
making him a direct descendant of the Maharal of Prague.
But, the reader may logically
ask: "Who is the Maharal of Prague?"
The Maharal of Prague is:
"...widely
known to scholars of Judaism as the Maharal of Prague, or simply The
MaHaRaL, the Hebrew acronym of "Moreinu ha-Rav Loew," ("Our Teacher,
Rabbi Loew") ". (4)
(5)
He was, literally, a famous wizard. A 16th century Bohemian Rabbi
famous for his occult study/writing on Kabbalah and famed for making a Golem
DETAILS
When
we originally published our document outlining Ratzinger's
Ancestry on January 2013 we received the following letter from an alert
reader:
From (Mr.) SF @ US
Could
Pope Francis be Ratzinger's "Golem"?
Anne
Emmerich saw a future Church with "two popes"(6)
I saw also the
relationship
between two popes ... I saw
how baleful
would be the consequences of this false church. I saw it increase in
size;
heretics of every kind came into the city of Rome. The local clergy
grew
lukewarm, and I saw a great darkness...
"I had another vision of the great tribulation. It seems to me that
a concession was demanded from the clergy which could not be granted. I
saw many older priests, especially one, who wept bitterly. A few
younger
ones were also weeping. But others, and the lukewarm among them,
readily
did what was demanded. It was as if people were splitting into two
camps.
"I saw that many pastors allowed themselves to be taken up with
ideas that were dangerous to the Church. They were building a great,
strange,
and extravagant Church. Everyone was to be admitted in it in order to
be
united and have equal rights: Evangelicals, Catholics, sects of every
description.
Such was to be the new Church ... But God had other designs. "
Respectfully,
SF
It is obvious that all pieces are falling together through the
publication of the encyclical letter on the environment, Laudato Si. So
much so that a group of scientist have made a collective public
statement which has been reported and commented upon by a conservative
Catholic
publication (7)
from which we quote a
few lines below:
Blinded
by a bogus science.... Pope
Francis endorses the U.N. One World Order's agenda.
The scientists' verdict: The pope is
risking his moral status and his
credibility.
In fact, this group is directly
warning Pope Francis that if he
embraces the climate agenda of the United Nations, he will be violating
both scientific principles and the religious values he embodies that
are supposed to be reflected in direct aid for the poor people of the
earth.
At this point let us not forget that, as we announced on September
2014, (8) - the
Jerusalem Post reported:
"Shimon
Peres, a patriarch of today's
Israel, wants to leave a legacy. Most in this mode aim for things like
monuments, memoirs and money. Peres'
aim is world peace. And in
his opinion, Pope Francis, a man he calls "Holy Father", is the one to
make it happen"
and
When
Fulvio Scaglione, deputy managing editor of Famiglia Cristiana, asked
Shimon Peres, “Would you see the pope as the leader of United
Religions?” “Yes,” Peres replied. And not only because Francis is a
globally respected leader. He is also the best choice because the world
needs “an indisputable moral authority that says out loud, “No, God
does not want this and will not allow it. We must fight against
exploitation in the name of God.”
One World Order (9)...
One World Religion (10) sponsored
by the Opus Dei and promoted through
the Vatican. Right on target and on schedule!
CONCLUSION
As we said at the beginning of this brief document - the Golem parallel
is purely symbolic but
right on target. Even if we attempted to cobble together this parallel
it would have been impossible since the inputs are from various and
disconnected-from-us sources.
EPILOGUE
As for the False Christ... he has been unmasked! (11)
Brothers and sisters - we cannot make it any clearer. The proverbial
ball is in the reader's court and our hands have been washed of any
responsibility of any and all suffering associated with God's Megaphone
by issuing this alert.
NOTES
(1) God's
Megaphone
(2)
Source
(3) Golem
(4) Judah_Loew_ben_Bezalel
(5) Rudolf_II,_Holy_Roman_Emperor
- Is Rudolf a clue to the seeming
'hereditary' Germanic problem
with the occult? A precursor to the fabled Illuminati?
He was
the secular 'right arm' of the Maharal and the Holy Roman Emperor.
(6) The Emmerich Visions
in question may be found through
This
Link under the heading THE FALSE ECUMENICAL, HERETICAL CHURCH
ESTABLISHED IN ROME
(7)
Tradition
In
Action
(8) Our Announcement
(9) One
World Order
(10) One
World Religion
(11) The False
Christ - finally
unmasked!
En Español: Papa Francisco - El Golem del Papa Benedicto
Published on June 18, 2015 -
Release date by the Vatican for Laudato
Si Encyclical
© Copyright
2015 - 2021 by The M+G+R
Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and
distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as
to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior
written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.
The M+G+R Foundation
About
Us || Frequently
Asked Questions || Disclaimer
Related
Documents
PAGE of
INTRODUCTION to DOMAIN
HOME PAGE
HOME PAGE - Español
HOME PAGE - Portugues
Back
Up HOME
PAGE
Our Research Department
Please Note: If the above dated image does not appear
on this document, it means that you are not viewing the original
document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.
If you wish to contact The M+G+R Foundation, please
access our Contact Page and follow the
instructions.