Regarding the Ukrainian Crisis started in 2014 - Its Potential Worldwide Impact

Regarding the Ukrainian Crisis started in 2014

Its Potential Worldwide Impact

Originally published on March 7, 2014
Reissued on March 31st, 2022

Russia-Ukraine clash in Crimea

NOTE added March 2022: This document was written in 2014 in relation to the Russia-Ukraine Crisis with Crimea. We reissue it now without changes because the same keys and conclusion are still valid for understanding the background of the Russia-Ukraine war of 2022 – which, in reality, is a continuation of the same Crisis. In the text, references to "currently" refer to the year 2014.

On 19 February 1954, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union issued a decree transferring the Crimean Oblast from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. The General Secretary of the Communist Party in Soviet Union was at the time the Ukrainian Nikita Khrushchev.

Following a referendum on 20 January 1991, the Crimean Oblast was upgraded to that of an Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (ASSR) on 12 February 1991 by the Supreme Soviet of the Ukrainian SSR.

With the collapse of the Soviet Union, Crimea became part of the newly independent Ukraine, which led to tensions between Russia and Ukraine.

On 26 February 1992, the Crimean parliament renamed the ASSR the Republic of Crimea and proclaimed self-government on 5 May 1992 and passed the first Crimean constitution the same day. On 6 May 1992 the same parliament inserted a new sentence into this constitution that declared that Crimea was part of Ukraine.

On 19 May, Crimea agreed to remain part of Ukraine and annulled its proclamation of self-government but Crimean Communists forced the Ukrainian government to expand on the already extensive autonomous status of Crimea. In the same period, Russian president Boris Yeltsin and Ukrainian President Leonid Kravchuk agreed to divide the former Soviet Black Sea Fleet between Russia and the newly formed Ukrainian Navy.

Some important items on situation in Ukraine-Russia which potentially may not be clear based on Western media presentation.

1. Majority of Russians sincerely believe that nazi-fascist government took over of Ukraine. Please read previous sentence a few times until you realize horrific reality. Ukrainians and Russians are really brothers and are very close culturally.

There are some differences, especially based on Ukraine vs Russia stance but on personal level usually relationships were pretty good and friendly. Now, after a few months of very intense propaganda, majority of Russia, from ordinary people and up to companies top management believes that fascist are controlling Ukraine and want all Russians dead. Actually this is a main pre-text for current Russian invasion – "to protect Russians from radical ultra nationalists".

2. Putin is not a mad-man and did not loose connection to reality. It's just his reality is different, very different. West, especially EU makes exactly the same mistake with Putin as they did with ex-president of Ukraine – Yanukovich. They made false assumption.

Yanukovich was not an authoritarian leader. He was (is) a die-hard criminal with many psychological disorders (just watch video from Rostov-Na-Donu in Russia when he breaks a pen during press conference before apologizing) who was running a country with a population of 45 million people – "a jet fighter flight to Berlin" – but in a nice suit and could shake hands and smile. That is the reality. Even in Ukraine for many he was "unpredictable", but simply because they made a false assumptions of who he really was.

Same is with Putin. He is smart, determined and has a vision of "his" future. The most coherent explanation I've found is that he and his closer circle follows Huntington theory/ideology of "Clash of civilizations", where Russia has its borders based on culture and conflicts will happen not based on resource needs but based on "different world views".

This explains a lot, like why Russia wanted to take not entire Ukraine but rather just south-east regions where people predominately speak Russian. Also it is important to keep in mind that he is an alpha male. If West will take a "forceful" path – he is ready to play that game too, up to arming and directing nuclear weapons.

3. The reason why there is no shooting between Russia and Ukraine is not "success" of Western diplomacy (actually it did helped, but not much) but because of courage of Ukrainian army (I hope you already saw video where unarmed Ukrainian officers are marching towards Russian invaders, Russians starts shooting in the air and Ukrainians don't flee but start singing national anthem and continuing their marching).

Putin expected 2 scenarios: During Russian assault on military bases Ukrainian army start shooting and there are Russian soldiers dead which "justifies" full blown invasion – Georgia/Abhazia scenario from 2008. Or, they just surrender under fear of death. Instead Ukrainians showed scenario number three – nobody surrenders, nobody fights. We call it "swearing as a weapon". But to do this you need to be really brave, because it is a real world, and not a movie, you die only once.

Such behavior cased great confusion for Russians and broke many plans. Anecdotal situation happened when Russians wanted to take over Ukrainian military ship. After threatening they heard – "Russians don't surrender!". The reason was that the captain of Ukrainian ship was a Russian, living in Crimea with Ukrainian citizenship and with oath to the people of Ukraine.

4. Western media to some degree is influenced by Russian propaganda. Even very basic facts checking shows that all information from Russian officials related to situation in Ukraine is a pure lie. There is even a site (stopfake.org) which dissects each such "information" from official sources and compares to actual information. But in reality some EU and US media covered events with Russian "background" as facts. I hope this is a lack of professionalism and not something else...

5. Reality is hard, Denial is easy. Yes, we are in 21st century and here is a country with 143 million people (Russia), with lots of nuclear and conventional arms with a Hitler style person as a leader and a massive following by his people.

The Steps are simple. We will keep them general so as to accommodate the corrections of course that the "saviors of the world" (3) may deem necessary as the plan is implemented.

Step 1: The whole world, country by country is brought into great turmoil. Propitiated by political, financial, ethnic or religious confrontations or whatever is the best means in each country to achieve the desired purpose: Generalized chaos. In Summary: "Bring the world up to its boiling point". (A reality which is right now confirmed in most parts of the world.)

Step 2: A nuclear conflagration will be started through one of the many dangerously unstable nations throughout the world. The nation to be used as the "trigger" will be changed many times before the non stoppable chain reaction commences.

Step 3: This will lead to complete global chaos – wars, revolutions, financial collapses, religious upheavals and persecutions with the intent of the eventual manifestation of the False Christ.

The Ukrainian crisis may be the trigger to the nuclear holocaust – with its unspeakable horrors – that was originally scheduled to take place before the climax of the Chastisement. This crisis is not a gimmick as the Cuban Missile Crisis was. The Ukrainian crisis is real, and Putin, whether conscious or unconscious, was preparing for it since 2012. (6)

Reality is hard, Denial is easy. Yes, we are in 21st century and here is a country with 143 million people (Russia), with lots of nuclear and conventional arms with a Hitler style person as a leader and a massive following by his people.