Google, Facebook, and Twitter's Conflict of Interest in
Vaccines
Main investors in Social Media Platforms are major investors in Vaccine Industry (1)
Can we expect them to become unbiased "fact checkers" about vaccines?
Disclaimer
Originally published on January 2nd, 2021
A guest document by Ricardo de Valencia
Main investors in Social Media Platforms are major investors in Vaccine Industry (1)
Can we expect them to become unbiased "fact checkers" about vaccines?
Disclaimer
Originally published on January 2nd, 2021
A guest document by Ricardo de Valencia
INTRODUCTION
Google, Facebook and Twitter, along with other so-called "social" media platforms, are giant machines driven not by simple altruism, but by financial interests first and foremost. Therefore, to know the direction in which they really move, it would be very informative to know their sources of income and their sources of financing.
Since they are essentially free platforms, it is quite obvious that their income must be mainly through advertising. As the pharmaceutical industry is a major advertiser, social media platforms must inevitably have a bias in reporting or censoring information about pharmaceutical products and, particularly, those related to vaccines.
The information bias caused by the interest of not harming their advertisers is an interesting issue, but what we are going to examine in this document are the financial sources. Who are the investors of Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.? Using publicly available information, it is possible to reveal that the largest investors in these companies are also investors in the vaccine industry.
DETAILS
Much is said about the famous personalities behind Google, Facebook and Twitter - people like Larry Page, Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey - but, among the biggest investors, in those companies are also institutional investors - companies or organizations that invest money on behalf of clients or members.
Some of the major institutional shareholders behind Google, Facebook and Twitter are also great investors in the vaccine industry: (2)
* Vanguard Group, an investment company with over
$64 billion in vaccine industry shares, is the
largest institutional shareholder in Facebook, Alphabet (the parent company of YouTube and Google)
and Twitter, with $84.7 billion worth of shares
between all the three media companies.
* Another investment company, BlackRock, has at
least $50 billion worth of shares in
vaccine-related companies. At the same time, it is one of the largest institutional shareholders
of the Facebook-Google-Twitter trio, with the sum of its investment in all three reaching a value
of more than $75 billion.
* The investment company FMR (Fidelity) also stands
out. It is the major institutional shareholder of the vaccination companies
Regeneron and
Moderna, with a value of at least
9.5 billion dollars between the two. This company
is the third largest institutional shareholder of Facebook and the fifth largest institutional
shareholder of Alphabet, with an investment value of more than
32 billion and
11 billion dollars, respectively.
* The investment companies Geode and
Northern Trust also have a large volume of shares
simultaneously in the Google-Facebook-Twitter trio and in many vaccine companies. Together with
those related to Vanguard and BlackRock, we are speaking of these vaccine companies:
Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax, Inovio,
Regeneron, Vaxart, Vir Biotechnology, Heat Biologics and Gilead. (See Appendix for
details)
Despite the great voting power in the hands of a few individuals controlling the media platforms (as in the case of Facebook- with Zuckerberg - and Alphabet - with Larry Page and Sergey Brin) (3), there is no doubt that the amounts of money invested by the major institutional shareholders - in the order of tens of billions of dollars in both fields - poses an enormous conflict of interest that may have a significant influence on the policies of the social media platforms towards vaccines.
From the investors' point of view: If you have tens of billions of dollars invested in vaccine companies and, at the same time, you are investing large amounts of money in global media platforms, then what is expected in the business world is that you will do your best to make sure that the media platforms do not spread information that will ruin your vaccine business.
From the point of view of social platforms: In light of the information presented here, if you were a manager of Facebook, Google or Twitter, would you consent to spread information that negatively affects vaccines, harming your biggest investors? Wouldn't you feel "subtly encouraged" to implement in your platform censorship policies to block any opinion or information contrary to the promotion of vaccines?
Some more assorted facts
There are some more facts, as far as we know:
* Verily, a subsidiary of Alphabet (Google's parent
company), teams with the pharma industry to conduct drug and
vaccine clinical trials.
(4)
* In 2016, Alphabet inked a $715 million deal with
GlaxoSmithKline to create
Galvani, another venture to develop bioelectronic
medicines and vaccines and to mine medical
information from Google customers. (5)
* Google's Customer Services President, Mary Ellen Coe, sits on
Merck's board
(6). As of October 2020, Merck is
developing two separate potential coronavirus
vaccines.
(7)
* In 2018, Google invested $27 million in Vaccitech
to make vaccines for flu, MERS, and prostate cancer. In 2020, Vaccitech started work on a COVID
vaccine.
(5)
* Facebook and Google hired "FactChecker"
(Politifact) to censor vaccine
misinformation. Politifact was launched by a grant from the Gates
Foundation, the world's largest vaccine
promoter. (5)
* Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellman, who was (until October 2019) the lead director of the committee
in charge of making Facebook policy, served also as the Chief Executive Officer of the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation from 2014-2020.
(8)
In case someone doesn't know or doesn't remember, Instagram and WhatsApp are owned by Facebook (9), and many people use Instagram as a source of news (10). YouTube and Google, as we said before, are subsidiaries of the same company, Alphabet (11). Another major search engine, Bing, belongs to Microsoft, which, as everyone knows, is linked to Bill Gates, one of the world's largest sponsors of vaccines (12).
Pinterest and Snapchat, which many people use to get news (10), also have institutional shareholders who at the same time have large investments in the vaccine industry (see Appendix).
CONCLUSION
There you have it: Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp, Pinterest, Snapchat, Google and Bing - Are they in a fair position to be the watchdogs against vaccine "disinformation"?
Are they really in a fair position to build policies for objective and unbiased filtering of information and news about vaccines? Is there not, rather, a motivation for their information filters to be diverted towards the promotion of vaccines? And, in particular, toward the promotion of the Covid-19 vaccines, regardless of any scientifically based claims that may exist?
APPENDIX
Please note that we are referring here to institutional investors, apart from personal investors. (3)
Table 1
Top 3 Institutional Holders of each Media Company
Top 3 Institutional Holders of each Media Company
| # 1 |
# 2 |
# 3 |
|
| Vanguard (7.71%) |
BlackRock (6.59%) |
FMR (5.16%) |
|
| Alphabet | Vanguard (6.73%) |
BlackRock (6.07%) |
Price Assoc. (4.06%) |
| Vanguard (10.20%) |
Morgan Stanley (7.55%) |
BlackRock (7.30%) |
|
| Vanguard (7.92%) |
BlackRock (4.64%) |
Flossbach v.S. (3.33%) |
|
| Snapchat | Price Assoc. (9.20%) |
Vanguard (6.94%) |
Edgewood M.C. (6.09%) |
NOTES
Alphabet: the company who owns Google and YouTube
Snapchat: properly, the company is Snap and the product Snapchat
Vanguard: The Vanguard Group, Inc., not including related Mutual Funds
Table 2
Participation quota of major Institutional Investors in Social Media Platforms (Part 1)
Participation quota of major Institutional Investors in Social Media Platforms (Part 1)
| Vanguard |
BlackRock |
FMR |
||||
| Shares |
Value |
Shares |
Value |
Shares |
Value |
|
| Facebook |
7.71% | $48.5B | 6.59% | $41.5B |
5.16% | $32.5B |
| Alphabet |
6.73% | $32.6B | 6.07% | $29.4B |
2.33% | $11.3B |
| Twitter |
10.20% | $3.6B | 7.30% | $2.6B |
1.44% | $0.5B |
| Pinterest |
7.92% | $1.7B | 4.64% | $1.0B |
n.a. |
n.a. |
| Snapchat |
6.94% | $2.2B | 4.43% | $1.4B |
1.33% | $0.4B |
| TOTAL |
$88.6B |
$75.9B |
$44.7B |
|||
NOTES
Vanguard: The Vanguard Group, Inc., not including related Mutual Funds
Please note: $48.5B = 48.5 billion dollars (1 billion = 1 000 000 000)
n.a. = information absent or not accessible in the original source
Table 3
Participation quota of major Institutional Investors in Social Media Platforms (Part 2)
Participation quota of major Institutional Investors in Social Media Platforms (Part 2)
| Geode | Northern Trust | |||
| Shares |
Value |
Shares |
Value |
|
| Facebook |
1.53% | $9.7B |
1.18% | $7.5B |
| Alphabet |
1.34% | $6.5B |
1.21% | $5.9B |
| Twitter |
1.58% | $0.6B |
1.50% | $0.5B |
| Pinterest |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| Snapchat |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| TOTAL |
$16.8B |
$13.9B |
||
NOTES
Please note: $9.7B = 9.7 billion dollars (1 billion = 1 000 000 000)
n.a. = information absent or not accessible in the original source
Table 4
Participation quota of selected Institutional Investors in Vaccine Companies (Part 1)
Participation quota of selected Institutional Investors in Vaccine Companies (Part 1)
| Vanguard |
BlackRock | FMR | ||||
| Shares |
Value |
Shares |
Value |
Shares |
Value |
|
| Johnson&Johnson | 8.70% | $34.1B | 7.36% | $28.8B | n.a. |
n.a. |
| Pfizer |
8.12% | $16.6B | 7.46% | $15.2B |
n.a. | n.a. |
| Gilead | 8.19% | $6.5B | 9.40% | $7.4B | n.a. | n.a. |
| Regeneron | 7.62% | $4.5B | 9.34% | $5.5B | 12.13% | $7.1B |
| Moderna |
7.04% | $2.0B | 5.11% | $1.4B |
8.65% |
$2.4B |
| Novavax |
8.53% | $0.6B | 6.75% | $0.5B |
1.69% | $0.1B |
| Vir Biotechnology | 4.34% | $0.4B | 3.20% | $0.1B | n.a. | n.a. |
| Inovio |
5.52% | $0.1B | 8.09% | $0.2B |
n.a. | n.a. |
| Vaxart |
4.56% | <$0.1B | 3.90% | <$0.1B |
n.a. | n.a. |
| Heat Biologics |
3.79% | <$0.1B | 1.51% | <$0.1B |
n.a. | n.a. |
| TOTAL |
$64.8B |
$59.1B |
$9.6B | |||
NOTES
Vanguard: The Vanguard Group, Inc., not including related Mutual Funds
Please note: $34.1B = 34.1 billion dollars (1 billion = 1 000 000 000)
n.a. = information absent or not accessible in the original source
Vanguard: The Vanguard Group, Inc., not including related Mutual Funds
Please note: $34.1B = 34.1 billion dollars (1 billion = 1 000 000 000)
n.a. = information absent or not accessible in the original source
Table 5
Participation quota of selected Institutional Investors in Vaccine Companies (Part 2)
Participation quota of selected Institutional Investors in Vaccine Companies (Part 2)
| Geode | Northern
Trust |
|||
| Shares | Value | Shares | Value | |
| Johnson&Johnson | 1.50% | $5.9B | 1.28% | $5.0B |
| Pfizer |
1.61% | $3.3B |
1.23% | $2.5B |
| Gilead | 0.59% | $1.3B | 1.26% | $1.0B |
| Regeneron | 1.68% | $1.0B | n.a. | n.a. |
| Moderna |
0.85% | $0.2B |
n.a. | n.a. |
| Novavax |
1.41% | <$0.1B |
1.14% | <$0.1B |
| Vir Biotechnology |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| Inovio |
1.41% | <$0.1B |
1.13% | <$0.1B |
| Vaxart |
1.07% | <$0.1B |
n.a. | n.a. |
| Heat Biologics |
0.59% | <$0.1B |
0.17% | <$0.1B |
| TOTAL |
$11.7B |
$8.5B |
||
NOTES
Please note: $5.9B = 5.9 billion dollars (1 billion = 1 000 000 000)
n.a. = information absent or not accessible in the original source
Please note: $5.9B = 5.9 billion dollars (1 billion = 1 000 000 000)
n.a. = information absent or not accessible in the original source
NOTES
(1) We are referring, in particular, to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp, Pinterest, Snapchat and Google. Although we do not have researched the investors of Microsoft, the Microsoft search engine Bing undoubtedly has to be, in vaccine-related matters, under the shadow of Bill Gates, one of the world's major vaccine promoters.
(2) Source of data on shareholding: see APPENDIX.
(3) Institutional shareholders and the voting power of some individual shareholders:
Between the shareholders, there are companies (like Vanguard Group, BlackRock, etc.) and
there are individuals (like Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page, etc.). Here we are giving figures of the
former while, if one makes an internet search of "who owns such and such a company", most of the
time one will find listings of the latter (for example,
this
list).
In the case of Alphabet and Facebook, a few individuals have special shares which give 10 times the voting power of the shares available to regular investors. This makes possible, for example, that Zuckerberg controls the majority of voting shares despite not owning a majority of the company (as told here). In the case of Alphabet, thanks to "super-voting" stocks, Larry Page and Sergey Brin have 51% of all votes despite not owning the majority of the shares. (The logic of such a situation is very well explained here)
In the case of Alphabet and Facebook, a few individuals have special shares which give 10 times the voting power of the shares available to regular investors. This makes possible, for example, that Zuckerberg controls the majority of voting shares despite not owning a majority of the company (as told here). In the case of Alphabet, thanks to "super-voting" stocks, Larry Page and Sergey Brin have 51% of all votes despite not owning the majority of the shares. (The logic of such a situation is very well explained here)
(4) Verily teams with the pharma industry to conduct drug and vaccine clinical trials: Source 1, Source 2, Source 3
(5) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. claims that "YouTube’s owner, Google, is effectively a vaccine company"
(6) Google's Customer Services President, Mary Ellen Coe, sits on Merck's board
(7) As of October 2020, Merck is developing two separate potential coronavirus vaccines
(8) Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellman serving in Facebook policy committee and in the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
(9) Facebook acquired Instagram for $1 billion in 2012 - Facebook bought WhatsApp for $16 billion in 2014
(10) Social media activities on select social networks by social media users in the United States in February 2019 - According to that study, the amount of respondents using each of the media platforms for getting news was: Instagram 18%, Facebook 38%, Snapchat 17%, Pinterest 9%, Twitter 56%. These percentages are not to be added. The figure of 18% Instagram, for example, means that, to the question "Do you use Instagram for getting news?" 18% of respondents answered affirmatively.
(11) Five companies owned by Alphabet
(12) For example: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation collaborates with the WHO (World Health Organization) "to increase coordination across the international vaccine community and create a Global Vaccine Action Plan" (Source). Companies that have received donations that in turn made money for the Gates Foundation include Merck, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline (Source).
Published on January 2nd, 2021
In Spanish: El conflicto de intereses de Google, Facebook y Twitter en relación con las vacunas
© Copyright 2021 by The M+G+R Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.
The M+G+R Foundation
About Us and Frequently Asked Questions
Related Documents
Index of Documents Regarding Covid-19 / Coronavirus
Open letter from Belgian medical doctors denouncing the contradictions of Covid-19
Open letter from Belgian medical doctors denouncing the contradictions of Covid-19
The intended calendar for an enforced or "encouraged"
vaccination
Vaccine experts don't know if the Covid-19 vaccines will prevent the infection
The Second Wave of the Covid-19 Conspiracy - Part 1. The two dominant versions of Globalization
Vaccine experts don't know if the Covid-19 vaccines will prevent the infection
The Second Wave of the Covid-19 Conspiracy - Part 1. The two dominant versions of Globalization
PAGE of INTRODUCTION to DOMAIN
HOME PAGE
HOME PAGE - Español
HOME PAGE - Portugues
Back Up HOME PAGE
Our Research Department
To search for information on our domain visit our Search
Page
Index of Documents Listed by Title and File Name
Index of Documents Listed by Title and File Name
Please Note: If the above dated image does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to view the original document.
If you wish to contact The M+G+R Foundation, please access our Contact Page and follow the instructions.