Keeping in mind that John F.
Kennedy was the first [and only]
Roman Catholic man elected President of the United States of America
[1960]
and what has already been stated in SECTION 10 (1),
consider that...
President Kennedy is assassinated in Dallas, Texas, on
November
1963, under yet to be clarified circumstances. His alleged assassin,
Lee
Harvey Oswald, is in turn assassinated by another mystery man, Jack
Ruby,
who in turn died in jail from multiple brain tumors.
Could it be that the first and only Catholic President of the
U.S.
refused to be part of certain plans which may have been related to the
long range plans of The Vatican's extreme right groups? (2)
Shortly after President Kennedy's assassination, Texan
George
H. Bush (3) begins his political ascent
(elected
to Congress from Texas in 1966) which eventually, yet, directly, led
him
to the White House.
Was George H. Bush being groomed to be part of the project which
President
Kennedy refused to be a part of and which cost his life and the life of
his closest associate and confidante, his brother, Robert F.
Kennedy?
From all appearances the only person to be benefited by the death
of
Kennedy was the Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson. However, this does
not mean that had any part in it.
Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, a Texan, assumes
the Presidency
of The U.S. and is eventually elected on his own right.
Documents recently released (4)
indicate
that Fidel Castro communicated to the then President Johnson that he
would
endorse his election to the extent of tolerating inflammatory rhetoric
and some hostile action.
Could it be possible that the first objectives of the
assassination
of President Kennedy was to place a Texan
in
the White House? Even Fidel Castro was willing to assist with Johnson's
election. But why? SECTIONS 9 (5) and
10 (1) may hold part of the answer.
Was the Governor of Texas, George W. Bush,
railroaded
into the White House so that his father's collaborators may wrap up the
establishment of the New World Order (6) since the original plans
did not work just as expected? Remember that President Clinton
blocked President George H. Bush reelection and
managed
to stay in office, against all odds, delaying the establishment of the
New World Order by ten years to the chagrin of Mr. M.
Gorbachev (7).
Was the Bush team,
father
and son, being used? (8)
As of the time of the reformatting of this document we have a
third Bush, and a fourth Texan, angling for the Presidency of the U.S.
Does it all appear confusing to you? Review NOTE added on
April 30, 2003,
and all might make sense then.
All of that
seems incoherent,
does it not? The key
to its coherence lies in the fact that there are several groups whose
underlying agenda, motivated by a Messianic Complex, is to "Save the
World". Naturally, each group will cooperate with the other to the
extent it is beneficial to their plans; however, as times goes
by and
each individual "salvific" project progresses, current allies turn into
bitter enemies.
In a letter
written years ago
by miguel de
Portugal to Dr. Joaquín Navarro-Valls, the official Vatican
spokesman,
he identified for, and pointed out to him the other Messianic Groups
besides de Opus Dei. If the reader carefully reviews that letter,
the
apparently contradictory behavior that we have stated above will become
very coherent and logic.
As we
have stated before many times, coherence is
the key to understand the events
which are engulfing the world these days.
NOTE
Added on December 7,
2003:
A new
book published
about the Kennedy Years seem to contain "hard copy" information that
corroborates
our statement:
"Could
it be that the first and only Catholic President of the U.S. refused
to
be part of certain plans which may have been related to the long
range plans of The Vatican's extreme right groups?"
