Findings
of the Corona Investigative Committee
A report by Reiner Fuellmich
Status 15-Sept-2021
Reiner Fuellmich (1),
an experienced trial lawyer licensed in Germany
and California (USA) and co-founder of the Berlin Corona Investigative
Committee (2),
summarizes the Committee's findings to date and reviews the
current status.
After consulting "about 150
distinguished scientists and experts from all around the world",
"The Berlin Corona Committee already
now has extremely incriminating evidence proving that this corona
plandemic never had anything to do with health", also sentencing
that "our governments ... are not
acting in the best interest of their people".
You can listen his entire declaration in this video:
Or, you can read the full transcript of said video in the lines below.
Complete Transcript (3)
INTRODUCTION
PART 1 - GOVERNMENTS AND JUDICIARY
PART 2 - PANDEMIC RE-DEFINITION
PART 3 - THE PCR TEST AND THE VACCINES
PART 4 - WHAT PLANS MR. GLOBAL IS OPENLY PURSUING
INTRODUCTION
Hello. I'm Reiner Fuellmich
and I want to tell you about the results of the investigations of the Berlin Corona Committee to date.
I've been working together with my colleagues in my firm as a trial
lawyer for 27 years. I'm licensed to practise law in Germany and in
California.
Until Covid emerged, we exclusively represented consumers and small and
medium-sized businesses against global criminal corporations such as
Deutsche Bank, VW [Volkswagen] and Kuehne-Nagel, the world's largest
freight carrier.
That changed after a virus,
previously labeled harmless, was suddenly declared the cause of a
global pandemic in March of 2020, and the world was suppressed
with lockdown, social distancing and mask mandates, as well as mass PCR
testing and so-called vaccinations for perfectly healthy people.
No coherent explanation was ever given for this sudden change of
opinion from "don't worry, this is a harmless virus" to "this is a very
dangerous virus many people will die". Instead, the governments and the mainstream
media deliberately spread panic. There are several leaked
internal documents of the ministries of the interior and various
countries that prove this targeted fear-mongering.
This was done by a worldwide lockstep approach of continuously blasting
out the alleged danger of the alleged new virus via the mainstream
media. In order to make this horror story credible, it was emphasised
with horrific images from Bergamo, Italy, and New York, amongst other
places. This was to suggest to everyone that there was every reason to
panic - very strange, as one
would expect a real government to try and keep the population calm if
there really was an emergency.
In the meantime, we have come to understand that, at least until the
beginning of the rollout of the so-called vaccines, there was no excess mortality anywhere. The
horrific images were partly staged and partly based on gross medical
malpractice.
In the face of this chaotic situation, which occurred literally
overnight - as if on command - our colleague Viviane Fischer and I,
together with two other lawyers, founded the Corona Investigative
Committee in Berlin on July 10th, 2020.
We did this in order to get answers to the questions to which our
Federal government - for reasons unknown to us at the time - was not
prepared to provide answers.
Above all, we wanted to know:
- How dangerous
is the virus really?
- How reliable is the PCR test developed by the German Professor
Drosten
and recommended worldwide by the WHO for detecting infections? And,
- How much damage are the anti-Covid measures causing
economically and to people's health?
Back to Index
PART 1
GOVERNMENTS AND JUDICIARY
The results of the Corona
Committee's
Let me first summarize the outcome of the Corona Committee's work to
date.
Since July 10th, 2020, we have consulted with about 150 distinguished scientists
and experts from all around the world and from all areas of
science, including health, law, economy, psychology, and psychiatry, on
these questions: How dangerous is the virus? How reliable is the PCR
test? And, How much
harm is caused by the anti-corona measures?
Among these experts are Dr. Mike
Yeadon, former vice president of Pfizer, Professor Luke Montagne, Nobel laureate from
France, Catherine Austin Fits,
investment banker and former deputy minister of the of the US, and,
also, most recently, politicians such as Sue Frost, member of the Board of
Supervisors of Sacramento County in California.
Now, if someone had told me a year and a half ago that the outcome of
the Corona Committee's work to date would be this, I would have told
them to take their pills and see their doctor. But our hearings prove
the following results beyond a
reasonable doubt:
* One, the Covid measures were never
about health.
We don’t have a pandemic. We have a
virus circulating that any intact human immune system can fight just as
well as the flu. And this is true, whether the virus occurred naturally
or was created in a lab.
Apart from that, there are very good alternative methods of treatment
to prevent or treat this disease such as Vitamin C, and D, zinc,
possibly Ivermectin, and others.
* Two, our governments,
at least almost
all European governments as well as that of the US, are not acting in
the best interest of their people, but are largely under the
control of
the backers of the global corporations and NGOs which are summarized by
Catherine Austin Fitz as Mr. Global.
This is also the term that I will be using here when I refer to those
who are pulling the strings behind the scenes.
Back to Index
The behaviour of the German
judiciary in the Covid cases
How did we come to this conclusion?
Well, before Covid, each of us had had their own, sometimes strange,
encounters which made us wonder if something isn't quite right, but we
couldn’t really put our fingers on what it was exactly. Long before
Covid came on the scene, my colleagues in my firm and I had a clear
sense in our work time and again that something was wrong in the German
courts of law.
Global corporations, such as Deutsche Bank, VW [Volkswagen] and
Kuehne-Nagel, seem to be above the law in the German courts. Because,
for example, Deutsche Bank,
one of the most criminal organizations in the world, is regarded by
politicians as "systemically important", and, thus, de facto, given
special protection in the courts of law as well. VW [Volkswagen] gets special
protection simply because they are the largest employer in the German
state of Lower Saxony.
Our suspicion, that the
German judiciary is so heavily influenced by politics, that it is no longer capable of applying
the applicable law to such corporations and uncovering their fraudulent
activities, turned out to have a real basis. The German phrase
"they hang the small fry, but they let the big fish go because they’re
supposedly too big to fail" is reality.
Based on the behaviour of the German judiciary in the Covid cases, it
is now clear beyond any doubt to us that this is indeed the case. German judges who
decide the cases before them, not in line with the Covid panic agenda
of the government, but on the basis of the applicable law, are not only put under pressure
behind the scenes. Rather, this is now done openly with the
arbitrary brutal methods of an anti-democratic, even totalitarian
regime.
This is obviously done to send a message to the judiciary as a whole so
as to prevent them from applying the applicable law and, thus,
questioning the government line.
Back to Index
The dramatic example of a judge
in Weimar (Germany)
The dramatic example of a judge in Weimar and the experts he called
upon for deciding a case proved this.
He had asked three experts to provide expert opinions in response to a
complaint from a mother of two, that her children were suffering severe physical and psychological
harm in school from being forced to wear masks, to comply with
social distancing and constantly getting PCR tested. All three experts
are respected professors at German universities. On April 8th, 2021, on
the basis of this expert testimony, he ordered that the school and the
school principal had to stop all such measures immediately.
Based on the testimony of the expert witnesses, he had determined that
the measures were without any factual basis. Because the PCR test, invented (4) by the - now highly -
controversial German professor Drosten, is not approved -
[emphasis] is not approved - for
diagnostic purposes, but only for scientific purposes. And,
contrary to the claims of professor Drosten, it can in fact under no
circumstances tell us anything about infections.
In addition, he had found that these Covid measures caused very serious
damage to the health of the children, of which the long-term
consequences are incalculable.
A few weeks after the
decision, due to political pressure, his house, office, and car was
searched and his computer and cell phone were seized because he
was accused of a crime.
The accusation [was] of bending the laws in the air, which is a crime.
But the specific accusation was not that his decision was wrong on its
merits. No. In fact, it still stands unchallenged on its merits and for
a very good reason: Both a court of appeal in Portugal and an
administrative court in
Austria had previously come to the same conclusion, that a PCR test cannot detect
infections and, therefore, cannot be the basis for any anti-corona
measures.
Instead, the accusation was that, as a family court judge, he did not
have subject matter jurisdiction to decide the case. Rather, the
criminal - obviously politically driven - case against him, states that
an
administrative court has subject a matter of jurisdiction over such
cases. However, in the meantime, several appellate court decisions in
Germany
have confirmed that in such cases of endangerment of a child's welfare,
of course, the family courts
have jurisdiction and must intervene, not the administrative courts.
Parallel to this, such searches
and seizures were also carried out at the homes of the three
expert witnesses, the lawyer, who had supported the children, and a
popular artist, who happens to be a friend of the judge.
Shortly thereafter, such searches and seizures were also conducted at
the home of another respected professor. This professor is one of the
world's best known experts on vaccinations and vaccines who have been
critical of the safety and efficacy of these injections as they are not
backed up by any scientific or medical studies.
Back to Index
PART
2
PANDEMIC RE-DEFINITION
Prologue to Parts 2, 3 and 4
How could it have come to this in a country that calls itself a
democracy?
Specifically, how is it that politics in Germany and in other
countries, in gross violation of the roman legal principle of "audiator
at ultra pars" - which means "hear also the other side" -, with the
help of mainstream media exclusively spreading government propaganda
and denigrating any and all dissenting opinions as right-wing,
right-wing, Nazi, Nazi, are now enforcing Covid measures ever more
harshly without any factual bases.
Meanwhile, Mr. Global and his political puppets are calling for
permanent lockdowns - first, Covid lockdowns, then, climate lockdowns -
and the continued use of untested
alleged vaccines, not just once, but regularly - regularly
recurring every six months - shots every six months.
In some countries, this is already reality.
I will give you the answer below, based on the Corona Committee's
expert hearings, by first reporting the facts about the actual dangerousness of the
virus and the
reliability of the PCR test and the health and economic damage
caused by the measures.
Then I’ll explain what plans
Mr. Global is openly - [emphasis] openly - pursuing, as evidenced by
the written and oral statements of, for example, World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab and Microsoft founder Bill Gates, while distracting the population
from these goals with the help of the of the Covid pandemic.
And, finally, I’ll explain how
we, the people, can regain, not only our sovereignty, but also
the assets that have been stolen from us by Mr. global for decades.
Back to Index
It doesn’t make a difference
anymore if it was artificial or natural
First, let's take a look at the Covid measures and how they were never
about health. This virus is
no more dangerous than a common flu.
There are indications that the original virus, allegedly first detected
in Wuhan, was artificially produced in the Wuhan Institute of Virology
by means of so-called gain of function experiments. Such experiments
intend to make a virus more dangerous - in particular, to cause it to
jump from animals to humans.
These are, in fact, experiments
for the production of bioweapons. Among others, the U.S.
immunologist Dr. Fauci and the
aforementioned German virologist professor Dr. Drosten, were significantly
involved in such gain of functions experiments.
There are a lot of things that need to be clarified, but this much is
certain: the original virus has long since ceased to exist. Rather, as
with every flow virus, various variants - mutations - have been
documented that may spread more quickly but are far less dangerous than the
original virus - and it
doesn’t make a difference if it was artificial or natural.
In addition, however, there are considerable doubts that the virus was ever
isolated in a scientifically correct manner.
Many scientists assume now that the flu virus or influenza A or B
was merely relabeled
by Mr. Global into a corona virus pandemic.
Ultimately, however, none of this matters, for the question of the
severity or dangerousness of the virus is easy to answer.
Back to Index
The question of the severity or
dangerousness of the virus
In the meantime, even the highly controversial WHO - which is in fact
controlled by its largest donors, including the Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation and its offshoot GAVI, which together have a stake in
almost all vaccine manufacturers in the world - agrees with professor
John Ioannidis of Stanford
University, one of the most cited scientists
in the world: the severity
of the virus, with a so-called infection fatality rate of 0.14 to 0.5
percent, corresponds with that of the flu.
There was no excess mortality
anywhere before the beginning of the so-called vaccinations.
As far as there were isolated increases or spikes in mortality - for
example, in Bergamo (Italy) and in New York - these are explained with massive medical malpractice.
In Bergamo, predominantly very old people’s pre-existing conditions in
nursing homes had died. Their immune systems had previously been
weakened by vaccinations and, then, in order to keep the hospitals free
for the panic stricken Covid patients - who never arrived - sick
people, including influenza patients, were transferred to the elderly care
homes. These, then, infected the weakened people there.
In addition, the WHO had installed Raineri
Guerra into the Italian
Ministry of Health, who falsified the data for the
pandemic exercise plans. Their last pandemic exercise had not taken
place in 2016, but in 2006, so that the medical professionals were
unprepared. In the meantime, he is not working at the Ministry of
Health anymore but the Italian public prosecutor's office is
investigating him.
In New York, as every year during flu season, some, but by no means all
hospitals, were overcrowded. On the Hospital Ship Comfort, with a
thousand beds available, no more than 20 to 40 beds were ever occupied.
In New York, it also affected predominantly older people, with pre-existing morbidities.
Without the panic messages
in the media, many people who would have stayed at home and
cured themselves under the correct assumption that they were ill with a
flu or flu-like illness, stormed some of the hospitals and fell victim
to, either hospital germs, or massive
medical malpractice - by, for example, intubation instead of
receiving oxygen, with oxygen masks, or far too high dosages of
hydroxy-chloroquine, or being treated with dangerous medications such
as
Remdesivir.
Of course, respiratory illnesses, including this one, which is now
called Covid-19, are, like the flu, dangerous diseases. And, of course, Covid-19, just like the
seasonal flu, has individual severe courses of illness and, also, death.
Typically, however, the immune system intercepts the virus and,
especially, the highly toxic spike protein in the mouth and nose. It only becomes dangerous when the
immune system is bypassed and the - mind you - highly toxic
spike protein, but also other ingredients such as mRNA and lipids and
other nanoparticles, are injected directly into the body.
In any case, as post-mortem examinations carried out in Germany have
shown in the meantime, the people who allegedly died with or from Covid
before the start of vaccinations, with few exceptions, had all passed the average human life
expectancy and/or suffered from other serious pre-existing diseases.
Virtually, none of the people who allegedly died of Covid had actually
died from Covid. 96 percent of the people who allegedly died of Covid
in New York and Bergamo, and 85 of those in Sweden, had died from completely different
diseases.
Back to Index
How was the corona pandemic
invented? What was behind this?
How was the corona pandemic invented? What was behind this?
Based, in part, on the testimony of two former WHO employees and
advisors, but also on the testimony of historians and investigative
journalists, as well as scientists, we can now trace the following
chronology.
Planned since at least
10 years ago
Concrete planning for the corona pandemic has been going on for at
least 10 years, and this is verifiable. The corona pandemic has been a
concretely planned pandemic by Mr. Global for at least 10 years.
Previously, in 2009, an attempt by Mr. Global to turn the Swine Flu
into a pandemic failed, literally, at the very last second. In
particular, because the German lung specialist Dr. Wolfgang Woldarg, who, at the
time, had political power as a member of the German Bundestag and the
European Council, had exposed that pandemic as a mild flu.
2009 - Change in the
definition of pandemic
Back then, the WHO had,
unexpectedly, changed the definition of a
pandemic overnight, so that, today, any flu can be declared a pandemic.
Until then, a pandemic was considered to be a worldwide disease with
many severe illnesses and many deaths. And, suddenly, it was supposed
to be, simply, a worldwide disease event, without the need for many
severe illnesses and many deaths.
Due to this completely surprising and never explained change in
definition, it was possible for the WHO - which is closely intertwined
with a global pharmaceutical industry - to declare the Swine Flu a
pandemic in 2009.
2009 - The approval of
vaccines backed by the new definition of pandemic
The consequence of this was that expensive vaccines were produced and
sold worldwide on the basis of contracts that have been kept secret to
this day.
These vaccines not only proved to be completely unnecessary - because,
contrary to all the horrific announcements from the pharmaceutical
industry and universities close to it (millions of deaths were
allegedly going to happen worldwide if vaccination wasn’t carried out),
the Swine Flu ultimately turned out to be a mild flu.
2009 - Health problems
caused by the vaccines
Furthermore, the vaccines led to serious health problems. Around 1300
children in Europe, especially in the Scandinavian countries, became
incurably ill with narcolepsy and are now permanently disabled.
Previous patents and
investments
Long before the current corona pandemic, dozens of patents on the
corona virus, including the spike protein, and also on the so-called
vaccines, had already been registered.
Even before the outbreak of the alleged corona pandemic, American
scientists were explicitly advertising investments in corona vaccines
to potential investors.
2019 - The Event 201
exercise
In October of 2019, before the corona pandemic rolled out in March
2020, with lockdown, social distancing, mass mandates and, finally, the
so-called vaccines, a final exercise took place in New York under the
title "Event 201". The Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation, the World
Economic Forum and the Johns
Hopkins Centre for Health Security were
involved.
2019 - The Wuhan
incident and the alleged novel disease
Shortly thereafter, an outbreak of what is now known as Covid-19
allegedly occurred, for the first time, in Wuhan China due to an,
allegedly, novel corona virus. A short time later, however, the
excitement died down in China, and the alleged novel disease had been
brought under control. Mr. global, however, used the Wuhan incident as
a springboard (so to speak) to set in motion his long-planned corona
plandemic.
Back to Index
PART
3
THE PCR TEST AND THE VACCINES
The staging of the pandemic with
the help of the Drosten PCR test
The staging of the pandemic with the help of the Drosten PCR test. This
is the centrepiece.
While all politicians and physicians worldwide (among them, also the
virologists professor Drosten), as well as the mainstream media, were
still reassuring the citizens and explaining that the virus from China
would, just like a mild flu, not be noticed by the vast majority of the
people, that no special measures needed to be taken (in particular,
that masks were completely unnecessary and pointless), professor Dr. Drosten, whose academic
background is now highly doubtful, invented (4) a PCR test with which Covid-19
infections could allegedly be detected.
This was at the beginning of January of 2020, while he was telling
everyone that there was nothing to worry about.
In two papers, the contents of which were disseminated worldwide by the
WHO, he made two false claims - deliberately
false, as has since been established. Two false claims that were
crucial to the pandemic.
* First, he
claimed that there are asymptomatic
infections, that is, that
everyone should be afraid of every perfectly healthy person showing no
symptoms, because he or she could be infected with Covid-19 and be
potentially dangerous, contagious.
* Secondly, he claimed his PCR
test, as the gold standard, could detect concrete contagious
infections with Covid-19.
Now, asymptomatic infections
with respiratory viruses, such as influenza or corona, do not exist
- as most recently proven by a study conducted with 10 million subjects
in Wuhan in late 2020, and as Drosten also knew when he published this.
And the PCR test
invented (4) by
Nobel prize winner Kerry
Mullis is neither
approved nor suitable for diagnostic purposes. This is because
it cannot distinguish between living and dead viral fragments and it
also tests positive for fragments of a virus left over from the
immune system's fight against the flu or cold that has long since
passed. In particular, the test cannot determine whether a whole virus (fragments are not enough
anyway) has entered cells and is replicating there.
Drosten knew all this and had explicitly stated, six years earlier, in
a newspaper interview concerning the MERS virus, which is another
coronavirus, that a positive
test had no meaning, but that completely healthy people could
also test positive.
Back to Index
New rules to declare a public
health emergency of international concern
Virtually overnight, for reasons that have not yet been fully resolved,
but that suggests an involuntary early start to this pandemic, Mr.
Global, through the WHO
politicians and mainstream media,
suddenly,
changed his mind. Mr. Global put pressure on the WHO to quickly declare
a public health emergency of international concern - public health
emergency of international concern.
According to the - freely invented - rules of the WHO, such an international health
emergency is the only basis on which completely new untested drugs
(in this case, so-called
vaccines) can be used on humans. Usually, the development and
approval of a new drug takes at least eight to ten years.
At the first emergency meeting in February of 2020, those present could
not agree to declare this fake public health emergency of international
concern - because there were no cases!
Nevertheless, because of the allegedly highly dangerous situation, the
group agreed to meet again, two weeks later. At that second emergency meeting,
the fake, the public health emergency of international concern, was
actually declared. What had changed? Well, nothing.
Back to Index
The role of the PCR test in the
declaration of a fake emergency
However, professor Drosten had made his PCR test available to the WHO.
And, with the help of this
test, the cases needed for the declaration of a fake, had been created.
Today, it must be assumed that the proclamation of the public health
emergency of international concern and, subsequently, all Covid measures, were based
solely upon completely meaningless false positive test results.
First of all, a PCR test per se
cannot detect infections, contagious infections, under any
circumstances, as I just explained.
Above all, however, Drosten had set up his test in such a way that it was
guaranteed to generate false positives. This is because of the
so-called cycles of amplification,
which one needs to evaluate the results of the test. That is, the
machine into which the swabs are placed enlarges the molecules that
are, otherwise, invisible to the human eye in many cycles (so-called
cycles of amplification, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, etc.)
There’s now a consensus that
anything over 24 cycles is completely unscientific and,
therefore, useless. Therefore, the Frankfurt
Health Department doesn't
take test results of more than 24 cycles into consideration at all. And
Dr. Mike Yeadon, formerly of
Pfizer, has stated (in agreement, by the way, with Dr. Fauci), that more than 35 cycles results in at
least 97 percent false positives. And the Drosten test, which
served as a blueprint for the vast majority of tests subsequently
performed worldwide, in that test, 45 - [emphasis] 45 - cycles of
amplification were used.
Back to Index
The so-called vaccines and the
question of informed consent
This was followed, always accompanied by the panic orchestra of the
mainstream media and the vast majority of politicians in quick
succession,
by the Covid measures such as a lockdown - which had been invented
shortly before in China -, social distancing, mass mandates and,
finally, the so-called vaccines.
These alleged vaccines are, in reality, gene therapeutic experiments on unsuspecting - [emphasis]
unsuspecting - humans,
because there was no valid
informed consent.
To be emphasized at this point, that every invasive medical
intervention is a bodily injury or battery unless the patient
explicitly consents to it. And his consent is invalid if he is
not informed correctly and completely, that is,
- about the
fact that no medical studies have been conducted, there's only an emergency use
authorization,
- and about the numerous,
very serious side effects that have become known in the meantime.
This concept of informed consent is the most important result of
the Nuremberg Trials of 1946.
However, it was precisely these injections, designated by way of
deception as "vaccines", with substances that have not previously been tested in
scientific studies for their safety and efficacy, that had been
Mr. Global's goal from the very beginning,
The subsequent steps ordered after the proclamation of the fake - lock
down, social distancing, compulsory masking - served only to make the
population believe in a danger that didn’t exist to unsettle and
disorient them and, thus, make
them so compliant that they would finally consent to the
so-called vaccines as the only means of obtaining protection or
immunity against the disease.
Back to Index
The void reason and the dangers
of these "vaccines"
There is no reason for the
use of these vaccines. This is because, as stated above, there is no Covid pandemic at all.
Only a PCR test pandemic.
Apart from that, there are
highly effective and completely harmless alternative preventive and
curative treatments, as outlined above.
Even worse, the vaccines are
completely ineffective, as the example of Israel shows -
particularly dramatically. There, 86 percent of the people treated in
hospitals
for Covid are double vaccinated.
And, the vaccines are highly
dangerous.
Through a whistle-blower, it has become known that the numbers of
deaths after vaccination in one of the U.S. registers have been
falsified. Conservative estimates now arrive at, at least, 500,000 deaths after
vaccination since the beginning of the vaccine rollouts.
In addition, there are other
serious side effects, such as neurological disorders,
thrombosis, myocarditis, and more.
For the fall, winter and coming spring, experts expect severe problems
for those vaccinated when they encounter the so-called wild virus in
the form of a cold or flu virus. Due to ADE [Antibody-dependent
Enhancement], cytokine storm, autoimmune diseases and more severe cases
of thrombosis, among others.
Since these "vaccines"
damage the immune system, not only will each subsequent booster
cause more damage, but precisely the contact with the so-called wild
virus will as well.
All the massive side effects that have occurred in the meantime were
known to the American CDC long before the vaccine rollout began. Worse
yet, as evidenced by the now disclosed contents of both the
manufacturers documents submitted to the EMA (the European Medical
Agency) and the manufacturer’s secret contracts with nation states, the manufacturers do not know
whether their so-called vaccine is effective - they do not know
it.
Nor do they know if it is
dangerous. But they
demand immunity from nation states in the event that claims are
made against them for vaccine injuries. And they also explicitly demand
that, if there are alternative methods of treatment (which do, of
course, make vaccines completely unnecessary) their experimental
products must still be purchased.
Back to Index
PART
4
WHAT PLANS MR. GLOBAL IS OPENLY
PURSUING
A summary of the plans
Finally, let's take a look at the plans of Mr. Global and the control
politicians and how these plans can be prevented.
Amazingly, anyone can read what Mr. Global and his puppets, such as Klaus Schwab (the founder of the World Economic Forum) or Bill Gates (the Microsoft founder
and world's largest vaccine investor) are up to. It is all out in the
open.
For many years, following in his father's footsteps, who was a
convinced eugenicist, Bill Gates has been talking about the need to
dramatically reduce the
world population.
For years, he has been in the headlines, again and again, for using
alleged vaccines in Africa and India, which, in reality, led to the sterilization of women and girls.
Klaus Schwab goes in the same direction and spells this out, for
example, in his book, The Great Reset,
and demands, beyond that (supported by the current pope, by the way), a World Government, under the UN,
which has, in the meantime, been brought under control by the WEF [World Economic Forum].
This is to be achieved by creating as much worldwide chaos as possible
in the form of pandemics, wars - including civil wars - and natural
disasters, so that the world population becomes convinced that the
national governments are overwhelmed and only a world government can
help.
At the same time, Schwab calls for the shifting of all wealth to Mr.
Global, so that in 2030 no
one (except, of course, Mr. Global) will still own anything.
But will, supposedly, be happy with that.
In addition - and this is a central building block in Mr. Global's
strategy - cash is to be
abolished and replaced by a digital currency.
This will be allocated to, or taken away, from every person in the
world, who can then also be found anywhere at any time by various tracking systems. This is
to be done by a single
central world bank.
Quite obviously, therefore, (this is, in particular, the opinion of
the psychologists and psychiatrists whom the Corona Committee has
heard), when it comes to Mr. Global and his puppets, we're dealing with
psychopaths and sociopaths.
And here's another important piece of information. Through the WEF [World Economic Forum],
initiated by Klaus Schwab in 1971, Mr. Global has been training his own
puppets, since 1992, through the Young
Global Leaders program.
Angela Merkel and Bill Gates were among the first
class to graduate the class of 1992.
Even a large number of current leaders - politicians, predominantly
weak personalities with however mostly well-trained rhetorical skills -
also come from this program, including Macron
in France, Kurz in Austria, Justin Trudeau in Canada, Jacinda Ardern in new Zealand, but
also the German health minister Jens
Spahn and the EU Commission had Ursula
von der Leyen.
Back to Index
Facing to accountability
Against this background, which increasingly more people are
recognizing, very large legal disputes have been set in motion
or are now being set in motion in India, in South Africa, in the US, in
Canada and in France, among others.
Their goal is to hold those
who are responsible for this pandemic accountable under both
civil and criminal law. This also includes that the assets that have
been taken away from the world's population by Mr. Global and the
global corporations and NGOs - controlled by him, not only since Covid,
but already for decades -, are returned.
In those cases where there are no clear criminal actions but where,
instead, contracts are the basis for damages, these should all be void.
In particular, Anglo-American
law, with its powerful tools of class action, pre-trial
discovery and, of course, punitive damages, in the event that willful
intentional infliction of damage can be shown, provides the tools for very
effective justice. In
Portugal, Austria and Germany, excellently written court decisions
have stated that the completely unsuitable drugs and PCR test cannot be
a basis for any Covid measures.
The Berlin Corona Committee
already now has extremely incriminating evidence proving that this
corona plandemic never had anything to do with health. Rather,
Mr. Global's actions are aimed solely at these goals:
- destruction of regional economies
to make the population dependent on Mr. Global's global supply chains;
- shifting the wealth
of the world’s population from the bottom to the top, to the
super rich, to Mr. Global;
- population reduction
(you can call it genocide);
- as well as
Mr. Global gaining total
control over the remaining population
- and the installation of a World Government under the UN,
which is now under control of the World
Economic Forum.
We are dealing - this must be stressed once again - with megalomaniac psychopaths and
sociopaths which must be stopped and, in fact, should have been
stopped a very long time ago. But, now, the time has come.
More and more people
worldwide are waking up and realizing who is pursuing which
goals with this plandemic. Even if the mainstream media is hiding it,
hundreds of thousands of people are taking to the streets all over the
world, including in London (England), Berlin (Germany) but also in
Australia, Brazil, etc. More and more politicians and lawyers, medical
doctors as well as public service employees, even police officers,
refuse to participate in these crimes against humanity.
Back to Index
An optimist epilogue by Mr.
Fuellmich
But, in addition to our legal efforts, and in addition to our efforts
to disclose the facts and bring everything out into the open, there is a third level - namely, the
spiritual or religious or cosmic call, what you will level. And
this level, we deem, is crucial.
We can see this in a story a German doctor told us very recently at the
Corona Committee. He wanted to draw money at an ATM and went into the
lobby of a bank. There stood an elderly woman wearing a mask, who
fearfully backed away from him because he was not wearing a mask. She
said he had to wear a mask because, otherwise, she was afraid of
infecting herself and then her husband. The doctor told her - no, she
shouldn’t be afraid. And, then, he went up to her, took off her mask
and hugged her. The woman began to cry and said that no one had held her for more than
a year.
That's what this is all
about. Humanity versus inhumanity. We are human. We can laugh,
cry, sing, dance and hug. The other side, Mr. Global and his puppets,
can't do that. They can only fake feelings and have no empathy at all.
This is because the other
side has no access to the spiritual side.
The US constitution starts with the words "we the people". And, when
the wall came down, between East and West Berlin, 33 years ago, it was
the east German people chanting "we are the people that brought it
down". Mr. Global's house of cards will come crashing down the very
same way.
Without any doubt in my mind,
Mr. Global and his puppets will lose this war of good against evil.
They will lose their insane war against life and creation itself. There
is no other way.
Back to Index
NOTES by The M+G+R Foundation
(1) The proper title for
Mr. Fuellmich is Doctor (Dr.),
but not Doctor of Medicine. To avoid confusion, we have omitted the
treatment in the title of this document.
(2) Corona Investigative Committee
- Home Page | About
(3) Index, titles, formatting,
highlighting and notes in brackets by The
M+G+R Foundation. Notes in parenthesis are
transcription from Dr. Fuellmich' speech. An unedited,
automated transcript from YouTube
is available
here.
(4) To better qualify the words
by Mr. Fuellmich, that Dr. Drosten or Dr. Mullis invented the
(Covid-19) PCR
Test:
When talking about PCR, there is
the laboratory process,
invented by Dr. Mullis in 1985, and there is the concept of test for
diseases,
not invented by Dr. Mullis, but protested by Dr. Mullis, as we have
explained elsewhere.
Christian
Drosten did not invented the PCR process,
neither he invented the concept of the PCR test
- he just developed a
particular PCR test/protocol for the alleged
virus of Covid-19 in January 2020, based
on Dr. Mullis technique. PCR "tests" allegedly valid for others
diseases had been
developed in the past, such as those that created a false Pertussis epidemic in 2004-2006.
En Español: Conclusiones
de Comité de Berlín de Investigación del
Coronavirus - Un informe de Reiner Füllmich
Date of the video in BitChute:
September 15th, 2021
This transcript: Published in
this site (The M+G+R
Foundation)
on October 4th, 2021
Related
Documents
DISCLAIMER
- The M+G+R Foundation
is not
associated in any way with Dr. Fuellmich, YouTube nor BitChute.
