The purpose of this Public Forum is to
publicly respond to
correspondence
that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal
interest
in these very unsettling times.
We reserve the right to choose what
questions to address and how to
transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence
received.
The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in
the
case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the
appropriate
responsible entities.
From
DM @ USA
[Published on January 30th]
Q. When
the Warning of the Garabandal prophesy occurs, wouldn't the
"enlightenment of the conscious given to each of us by that event be
enough to change the mindset of people toward abolishing abortion on
demand? .... all of us are highly influenced by the ways of the
world
and seem to be punished in this life for doing the 'right thing'.
Also, I believe that Conchita mentioned something to the effect that
some of us would die (die from the stress of seeing what our sins
have
done). Are all of us in danger of dying from this stress ,
since we
are all sinners and have done (or failed to do all we should have done)
the right things time and time again?
DM
A. Even when such
enlightenment takes place many will still reject God. He is only
giving
all an opportunity to see the state of our souls; what we do about what
we see
still depends of an act of our free will. Obviously, if an individual's
name is not in the Book
of Life nothing will change that.
Yes, we all are influenced by the "wicked ways of the world" and will
pay the consequences if we "dance to the world's music". This is why,
those of us who become more and more aware of what is right and what is
wrong, MUST pray, as we
have explained, for those who cannot see it.
The
more aware we become of the Truth, the more God will expect from us -
most specially in the coming to the prayerful assistance to those who
are
lost and still must
find their way back to the Father because their name IS in the
Book of Life.
Yes indeed, many will die when they see the state of their souls. We
refer you to m de P's
experience; that experience took place a few
years after his
conversion and in a State of Grace. In his case, the shock was
logically
manifested as sorrow because by then he loved the Lord deeply and he
was experiencing how his past sins, already forgiven and paid for, had
made
Jesus suffer. No one enjoys witnessing the suffering of the object of
one's profound love.
A truly sorrowful and contrite heart combined with true faith in God's
Mercy
will greatly help at that time.
Note added on August 19, 2010
Please be advised that: The Warning,
Miracle and Sign announced at the time of the Garabandal phenomena
(1)
at San Sebastián de Garabandal, Spain, between 1961 and 1965
will
not come to pass.
The world is heading, without
further ado,
directly into the Chastisement
(2), which was
announced in Garabandal and Akita
(3), and which
we have independently confirmed several times since 1992.
We do not intend to explain, justify, or "do theology" regarding this
notification any further at this time
(4). We
do, however, encourage each and every one of you to act upon it as it
were the proverbial "Gospel Truth" - you have
nothing to lose
by heeding this advise, but
much to lose if it is ignored.
This announcement should in no way - directly or indirectly - cast a
doubt on the events of Garabandal which, without a doubt, were real and
from Heaven. However, all must remember the Sovereignty of God; a
sovereignty which He freely exercises as He sees how His children react
to His entreaties, and how those who were entrusted with the
Evangelization of His children have acted
(5).
We suggest that the guidelines on
"What to do?" that we
published long ago
(6) be taken out from the
"Hope (it doesn't happen) Chest" and followed,
now.
For those to whom God made a special promise associated with the
Miracle, we say:
Don't despair! God will keep His Word;
maybe not in the manner that you were expecting, but He will.
_________________
(1) Garabandal
(2) This
may be part of the chastisement
(3) Akita
(4) On September 30th, 2010, God has allowed us to explain
the reasoning behind this
(5) The
manipulation of revealed dates
(6) What can we do? Part 1
and Part 2
From MA
@ USA
[Published on January 30th]
Q. I
wanted to know what your opinion was on the wearing of the Brown
Scapular. I know from what I read that Our Lady said who ever dies
wearing this garment will not suffer eternal fire, but do you have to
read the little office of Mary every day, if you wear the scapular.
I wish to thank you for your patience with me. Love
MA
A. This, like with the
use of any other sacramental, should
not become like wearing an amulet
or owning a talisman. Consciously wearing the scapular is a reminder to
our, and His Mother
that we are Hers and are counting with Her help to make it
so more and more every day. It is also a reminder to ourselves of such
commitment. The wearing of the scapular is also a great psychological
help, especially in women: If a woman
wears one and she is going to wear a less than modest top garment, the
scapular will show and she will be automatically reminded that the top
garment is not modest.
In came satan and "invented" the misuse of the scapular medal: Crafted
in gold
and dangling from a gold chain.... too many times almost submerged in
an apparently bottomless
cleavage. Hardly a holy situation.
Empty and elaborate rituals are worthless - look at the world today
after millions of such Masses and Rosaries. If more than just a
small fraction of those Masses and Rosaries had reached Heaven, this
world would be a near paradise for His
children.
Instead, what we read
in Chapter 1 of the Book of
Isaiah applied.
A scapular worn with the right frame of mind (see first paragraph
above) and a well intended renewal of one's consecration to the
Immaculate Heart of
Mary on
a frequent basis will please God and Mary far more that to
automatically fulfill a ritual.
From RD
@ USA
[Published on January 30th]
Q. I
am very disappointed in your decision, since I learned so much from
your documents. I am glad, however, that you started to post
"Divine
Instructions and Encouragement," possibly the most useful of all your
departments.
Respectfully,
RD
A. Your kind words Glorify
God. We are happy to read that
you find the Divine Instructions and Encouragement useful.
Regarding
your "disappointment".... We suggest that you offer it to God in
reparation
for the disappointment the
Administrators
of the Church He established
have caused Him; to Mary for
the disappointment the Administrators of the Church Her Son established
have
caused Her; and to both for the disappointments that you have
caused
them Both.
God has a plan for each one of us and as we deviate from it, we cause
him grief and disappointment. Unfortunately we usually think of "my
disappointment" and not the disappointments that we may cause others -
most specially to those Who love us like no one else would ever be
capable of.
The nearly one thousand documents which helped you and many others so
much will remain on line and are easily
accessible. We pray that you continue to review them since much more
can be learned the second or third time around.
From LR
@ USA
[Published on January 30th]
Q. The
following thoughts came to me a couple of months ago.
We must respect and believe that our Lord God knows all and is
all
powerful. In His omnipotence He knows when a fetus
will be aborted.
Could not He, in His infinite Mercy, not allow a soul to enter
that
fetus?
What if all the energy, prayers, and supplication now being expended on
the abortion issue, were focused on World Peace, or the souls in
Purgatory, or to stop the death penalty in America for those we know
already have a soul, or to stop the terrible genocide of the World?
Who has tricked us into diverting our prayers in this
matter? I
cannot imagine the power of all those prayers pounding at
Heaven's
Door for these undeniable, visible horrors.
Thank you and may you continue in God's grace.
LR
A. God gave man a free will -
therefore, for Him to intervene and change the situation would require
that someone place in His Hands the means to do so. For example: m de
P, every day offers a decade of the Holy Rosary
prefaced with
the
following invocation:
Invoking the communion of saints and
faculties bestowed upon me, I offer this decade as an act of reparation
for the sins and offenses committed by those who promote, perform and
undergo abortions and euthanasia; sins and offenses for which Your
Divine Justice justly demands as an act of reparation before You will work the
pleasure of Your Mercy in their souls so that they may seek You,
achieve conversion and, as a consequence, abandon such destructive
behavior.
That
is "how the system works" and should be applied to all calamitous
situations - It is sad that after nearly 2000 years our
poor brethren have no been properly instructed in doing so. Why do you
think Mary has kept
coming for nearly two centuries?
To end all man-made horrors we must go to the root cause of the
problem. Didn't Jesus teach us, without a doubt, to pray for our
enemies and persecutors? When we pray for their conversion - those who
are to be converted, will, and their behavioral pattern will change to
be more Christ like. Regarding those who are not to be converted (and
only God
knows "Who Is Who")... when we pray for them they will, in essence, be
neutralized from harming you and anyone else God determines.
How many people prayed for Hitler when his true colors began to show?
Stalin when assumed the reins of the Soviet Union? Your local pedophile
priest and his collaborating Bishop? The terrorists who
indiscriminantly kill whomever they wish? We will venture to guess that
just a handful of individuals in the entire Christian Universe did.
This has become a "gimme" world - the only Trinity that most Christians
believe
in is "I, Me and Myself" just
to, when things just "don't go their way" say: "Is there a God?" "How
can God allow this?"
To that we answer: Yes, there Is a God and He
would not allow this if
we did our part and quit hosting "pity parties" and pointing the finger
at someone else. We are responsible for the sewer we live in in spite
of the enormous power placed in our hands by God through Jesus Christ.
To wit:
John 14:
11 Believe you not that
I am in the Father, and the Father in me?
12 Otherwise believe for the very works'
sake. Amen, amen I say
to you, he that believeth in me, the works that I do, he also shall do;
and greater than these shall he do.
13 Because I go to the Father: and
whatsoever you shall ask the
Father in my name, that will I do: that the Father may be glorified in
the Son.
14 If you shall ask me any thing in my name,
that I will do.
15 If you love me, keep my commandments.
L, we thank you very much for your very
valid questions which have given us the opportunity to share with one
and all some of the Light He has given us to pass on, and not to auto
glorify ourselves as it has been customary for the last 2000 years by
those who were supposed to do this.
From K
@ USA
[Published on January 18th]
Q. Back
in Oct. 2004 you responded to two questions posted to you. In one
of your answers you wrote that catholics abandoned Jerusalem to settle
in the seat of the Roman empire to pray in Latin. You said it was
a monumental blasphemy against God. What!?
Please explain this to me. Did I misunderstand what you wrote?
God Bless You,
K
A. The paragraph published
in October
15, 2004 that you
are referring to reads as follows:
The "problem" with the cross
does not lie far from this situation.
After all - it was under the Sign of the Cross that the Roman
Catholics slaughtered the Eastern Catholics when they sacked
Constantinople or when they slaughtered the residents of Jerusalem -
Muslims: mostly women and children - to recuperate Jerusalem for
Christendom (never mind that the Catholics abandoned Jerusalem to begin
with and settled in the seat of the Roman Empire to pray in Latin
instead of staying in Jerusalem to pray in Aramaic) - a monumental
blasphemy against God.
You misunderstood what we wrote, but it
is our fault because it is not clear enough.
Nonetheless, we ask you: How could we possibly even imply that
praying in latin is a blasphemy? Even if we did not have personal
favorite latin prayers such as
Salve
Regina and
Tantum Ergo,
how could we "rule" that the poor and disoriented Faithful are
committing a blasphemy for praying in latin as they have been taught?
That would place
us in
the same level as the Roman Church
Administration. God forbid!
The blasphemy that we referred to was the selling out of the Holy
Catholic Faith to
the
highest bidder - Emperor Constantine, followed by
the monumental lie that Constantine
had
willed the Roman
Empire to the
Church Administration.
The only problem that we may have with Latin is personal and it is
because
the
revolting flashbacks it evokes from time to time.
From LM
@ USA
[Published on January 15th]
Q. +JMJ+
Laudetur Jesus Christus et Ave Maria Semper Virgo!
Jesus' Church will Always be Jesus' Church - the gates of Hell will not
prevail against it. It has stood for two thousand years, and will
continue to stand because it is His Mystical Body, of which He is the
Head and the Holy Spirit the Soul. There have always been attacks
against it from outside and from inside - but It Continues to Stand,
and will continue to stand... your website sounds as though you are
saying it no longer stands.
Who is right: you or Jesus? Please don't let Satan turn you away
through spiritual pride and lack of humility and obedience to the
Magisterium, who has always been guided by the Holy Spirit. This is
God's Church, not man-made. Please don't attack It.
In Cordibus Jesu et Mariae,
LM
A. We sincerely thank you
for writing and sharing your thoughts with us, and now, with the world.
Although, we will be brief in the response now, we may issue a more
comprehensive response in the near future in the form of a full fledged
document.
First of all, we must clearly define what the "Church" really is. The
Church is composed by the laity and clergy of all who accept Jesus
Christ
as the Savior of mankind. Most specifically:
When
the apostle John told Christ, "Teacher, we saw a man casting out demons
in your name, and we forbade him, because he was not following us,"
Jesus replied, "Do not forbid him; for no one who does a mighty work in
my name will be able soon after to speak evil of me. For he that is not
against us is for us." [John
9: 38-40]
This is the opposite of the claim, maintained for centuries by Roman
Administrators of the Catholic Faith, that adherence to the Roman
Catholic Church was a
prerequisite for salvation.
Within that group - as in any organization - there is the Roman
Catholic Administration, as well as others, like in the Orthodox
Catholic Church, etc. This Roman Administration is composed by the
College of Cardinals and the lesser Hierarchy with the Bishop of Rome,
the Pope, at its head.
Said
Administration is in charge of the
mechanical workings of the organization which was supposed to
Evangelize the world and uphold the basic tenets of the Catholic Faith.
Even though they
failed in the Evangelization effort - and we have the
state of the world today to prove it - God, Who even satan must serve,
saw that the Pristine
Catholic Faith reach These Times to assist
His true Children - not those who claim to be, but those who strive to
do His Will.
As you will see, we fully agree with you in the fact that the Gate of
Hell not prevail against the Church, however, as we have clearly
pointed out, some conditions do apply.
As you will also see, if you are serious in pursuing this matter
further, not only we uphold the Catholic Faith, but we take it to
limits the above mentioned Administrators may not dare to because
is not
"politically correct" - the principle which has ruled Rome since
Emperor Constantine
(not the Pope) Presided the so often quoted Council of
Nicea.
However, we will not tolerate in silence, under any circumstances, as
our Lord
Jesus Christ taught us and the Apostles lived, abuses that openly
counter the Will of God as expressed by the Holy scriptures -
Old and
New Testaments - and the
requests of our Heavenly Mother.
Rome is always playing the "Excommunication" or "Not in communion
with" card as a threat to Catholics. There is another side to that
coin. No child of God and true follower of Jesus Christ wants to be
in communion with members of an Administration who, defying God and the
specific requests of our Heavenly Mother, became
the accessories of the
greatest genocide that humanity has ever experienced.
To clarify that point for those
who do not wish to see the obvious, we
shall give you a concrete example: We feel very much in communion with
H.H. John XXIII and H.H. Paul VI who
tried, after
learning the true
secret of Fatima, to steer the whole Mystical Body of Christ to a
position that would minimize what is to come upon it as such secret is
fulfilled; conversely, we
do not feel in communion with John Paul II, a
man whose assassination attempt had to be allowed by God to bring
Fatima to his attention and who voluntarily or not (only God knows and
will judge accordingly) turned the keys of the Church (certainly not of
Heaven!) to the Prelature
of the Holy Cross and Opus Dei and the other
sects who are, in essence, taking the Administration of the Church
back
to the witch hunt days of the Inquisition. Something that was directly
opposed to the teachings of Jesus Christ. To wit:
Jesus
rebuked his disciples for proposing to "...bid fire come down from
heaven and consume them..." after a Samaritan village had refused to
welcome Jesus and his followers (Luke 9:52-55). There's no hint
that Christ wanted his followers to use force against enemies of the
Faith.
In
conclusion, and quoting Peter as he told the Temple Masters: "We
must obey God rather than men." [Acts
5:29] and, through His Grace, will
do so until the End of
Time.
Once again, thank you for the golden opportunity to clarify these very
important points.
From JM
@ USA
[Published on January 10th]
Q. You
make reference to the night of broken crystals, but no mention of what
it is about, and when doing a domain search, it comes up no find.
May God continue to bless the work you do.
JM
A. We regret the confusion
resulting from functioning in three different languages. In English it
should have read "night of the broken glass". The referred to
tragedy is:
Kristallnacht - On the nights of
November 9 and 10, 1938, rampaging mobs
throughout Germany and the newly acquired territories of Austria and
Sudetenland freely attacked Jews in the street, in their homes and at
their
places of work and worship. At least 96 Jews were killed and hundreds
more
injured, more than 1,000 synagogues were burned (and possibly as many
as
2,000), almost 7,500 Jewish businesses were destroyed, cemeteries and
schools were vandalized.
However,
an even greater tragedy is that mankind did not learn its lessons -
even after the horrendous World War II. Therefore, our reference to
such night was a symbolic parallel as to what is to come, this time not
only for Jews, but for all the true children of God regardless of what
Faith the belong to - Jews, Christians or Muslims.
From Daniel
Noe
@ USA
[Published on January 7th]
Q. I
wanted to write to you and share what has been happening with me of
late. I was led to your web site after watching a program in November
on the History Channel, I believe, about the Blessed Virgin. Although
its content and innuendo obviously were aimed at distorting Marian
devotion, it prompted me to do a web search and I found your site. I
devoured it! You verbalize so many things that have been on my mind,
and call attention to the state of things I was beginning to think that
only I was noticing.
Etc., etc.
Daniel Noe
From JH
@ Canada
[Published on January 3rd]
Q. Many
people are predicting ( including some seers ) that the miracle will
happen on the 13th of April 2006. I, for myself, think that it is
very possible. What do you think? Thank you!
JH
A. As an introduction to our
answer, we wish to share with our full readership a message we just
sent to our Select List:
The following news reports have been
referred to us. We wish to share
them with you so that you may reassure those you share these
publications with that, when we prepared and issued the document
entitled
"It is now
about that
time.", we were not "under
the influence" of an excess of Church Incense....
North
Korea gathers kit for
nuclear bombs
Quotes:
NORTH
KOREA is working to restart a reactor that would produce enough
plutonium to make 10 atomic bombs a year, a leading American
nuclear
scientist has revealed.
Siegfried Hecker, former director of the US government’s top
secret Los Alamos laboratory, also said the North Koreans reprocessed
8,000 fuel rods to make up to 14kg (30lb) of plutonium last summer,
despite taking part in six-party talks hosted by China to end their
weapons programme.
“They have the plutonium,” he said. “We have to assume the
North Koreans can and have made a few nuclear devices.”
US planning strike against Iran
Quotes:
The United States government reportedly began coordinating with
NATO its plans for a possible military attack against Iran.
The German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel collected various
reports from the German media indicating that the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization are examining the prospects of such a strike.
According to the report, CIA Director Porter Goss, in his last
visit to Turkey on December 12, requested Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan to provide military bases to the United States in 2006 from
where they would be able to launch an assault.
Now, for our specific answer using
the above as a backdrop.
Why concern ourselves with the date of the Miracle?
Instead of trying to second guess the date of the Miracle, we should be
very, very concerned about the condition of our souls before the
chastisement. miguel de Portugal had a
personal preview
and as you may
read - it was not easy at all.
Beware! As we have also said: There are just too
many "seers" and
only those who have Eyes
to See will be able to discern which are the
ones that God has chosen to alert His children, and which He maintains
active, for These Times. We
strongly suggest that, what we have published in our Board in the last
month, be carefully meditated upon. We are "not on commission" - we
just want to make sure that we are in a solid position to say: "We
told
you so!" when it is too late to do anything else.
From MC
@ Canada
[Published on January 1st]
Q. In
reference to "Thou shalt not kill"? and to your posting in the Public
Forum dated November 1, 2005 (1)
Is that a truthful translation? I don't think so. I've
always been for the right to self-defence and defence of one's nation,
or of others who are unjustly aggressed, and I cannot picture God
realistically being against this; as long as the defence applied does
not exceed the status of defence. Once it becomes more, then it
clearly no longer is only defence; it is then aggression for
aggression, which is certainly against God's Will and Way. God is
against 'eye for an eye', but while it distinctly differs from defence.
The apparently and realistically much more truthful translation of the
above Commandment is: "Thou shalt not murder".
That's according to Jewish translations, and the explanation is that
(when the Ten Commandments were given to Moses) Jews believed in the
right to defence, and that killing strictly in defence is not murder; a
view I cannot logically disagree with. Both killing and murder
involve but are distinctly different forms of killing; the contrasting
underlying reasons being very important to keep in mind.
On that basis we have David vs Goliath, David having not murdered but
killed Goliath; strictly to defend the community against Goliath's
predatory aggressions.
Jesus never disagreed with either David's act or "thou shalt not
murder". Jesus said he did not come to replace the Old Law but to
fulfill the prophecies, along with inferring that he also came to
[clarify] how we're to understand and live by the Old Law(s). And
Jesus explicitly supported the Ten Cs when the Jewish man who was
wealthy, while saying he had always obeyed the Ten Cs, asked Jesus what
more he could do; and Jesus said to share the wealth with those in
need. Jesus did not tell the man to also stop adhering to the Ten
Cs.
When I come to such dilemmas, I just leave it to God to some day
clarify for us, if He wishes to ever do so. As for the rest of
Christian faith,
it's not really affected; Jesus' teachings nevertheless hold.
MC
A. We could spend a
considerable amount of time discussing the differences or equivalencies
of "kill" and "murder" although in common usage, now and then,
"kill" is to forcibly take someone's life - which belongs to God
- and "murder" is one of the ways of taking someone's life. We can
further get into: Did King David murder Uriah [2 Samuel 11] or did he have him
killed? He actually only set him up so that someone else would kill him
in the normal course of a battle. Etc., etc.
To cut through all the semantics and get to the core issue let us see
what Jesus said about
how to handle our enemies:
"But I
tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your
right cheek, turn the other to him also."
[Matthew 5:39]
....and,
just in case someone missed that
point He proceeded thus....
"But I say to you, love your enemies,
bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and
pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you,..." [Matthew 5:44]
Now, you may chose not to believe that, and such is your prerogative
and we respect it, but we cannot put words in Jesus' mouth justifying
killing in self defense.
To better illustrate this point, let us
now imagine hearing a Christian, soldier OR Commander
in Chief, who, voluntarily or involuntarily, is engaged in any kind of
war, praying the
Our Father (2)
with God's feedback as each invocation
is made.
"Our Father", you say; O hardened wretch! can
you
call Me Father, when you are just going to cut your brother's throat?
"Hallowed be thy name" How can My Name be more
impiously unhallowed,
than by mutual bloody murder among you, My children?
"Thy kingdom come" Do you pray for the coming of My
Kingdom,
while you are endeavoring to establish an earthly despotism, by
spilling
the blood of My children?
"Thy Will be done on earth as it is in Heaven" My will
in
Heaven is for peace, but you are now meditating war.
Dare you to say to your Father in Heaven "Give us this
day
our daily bread" When you are going, the next minute perhaps,
to
burn up your brother's corn-fields; and had rather lose the benefit of
them yourself, than suffer him to enjoy them unmolested?
With what face can you say, "Forgive us our trespasses
as
we forgive them that trespass against us," when, so far from
forgiving
your own brother, you are going, with all the haste you can, to murder
him in cold blood, for an alleged trespass that, after all, is but
imaginary.
"Let us not fall prey to temptation", Do you presume to
deprecate
the danger of temptation, who, not without great danger to yourself,
are
doing all you can to force your brother into danger?
"...and deliver us from evil." Do you deserve to be
delivered
from evil, that is, from the evil being, to whose impulse you freely
and
joyfully submit yourself, and by whose spirit you are now guided, in
contriving
the greatest possible evil to your brother?
"Amen!" Yes, indeed. "Amen" means "so be it", and so it
shall
for you - just as you have requested.
In conclusion - If you feel that Jesus teachings still hold, then,
should we not strive, hard as we can to live them, without putting
words in His mouth?
He Is indeed trying to clarify all of this for you and all and the key
to understanding what He really meant through the Holy Scriptures may
be found in our twin
documents
Biblical
Literalism Part
I and
Part II
We thank you for the opportunity.
(1) Public
Forum - November 2005
(2) Our
Father
From GMcE
@ Ireland
[Published on December 30th]
Q. Further
to your posting of Dec 28th 2005 - is it correct to say that you
are stating that as far as you are concerned that the full
manifestation of Step 1 in your series of end time events will
actualise before the expiration of the Patriot Act on Jan 22nd 2006.
Could you also indicate whether the posting entitled "An Announcement"
which concerned information in your possession which indicated the
possibility that the Miracle of Garabandal might take place on April
16th 2006, which date you were not in a position to confirm or
deny at the time, has been corroborated or not.
Also in that regard has the person who subsequently wrote to you and
suggested that your proposed date was incorrect, and that he/she knew
of another date that fulfilled all the conditions, but was waiting on
the guidance of the Holy Spirit before confirming their date, been in
touch again to reveal their information, and if so can you reveal it on
your website.
Best Regards,
GMcE
A. In reference to
said posting in our Board:
First of all, the
sections of the Patriot Act which have been extended for only one month
were to
expire on December 31. The "one month extension" of
said key provisions of the anti-terrorism USA Patriot Act
will now expire on February
3
, 2006.
Secondly - m de P does not make the
decision of what and/or how the information is published. We realize
that humans are used to have other humans, who may have been called by
God to serve Him, take the center stage - become "a star", so to speak.
The moment a human who has been called to serve God assumes the "center
stage"/"star" position, his/her
service ends and, henceforth, those who
"followed" him/her will be deceived.
m de P has been told before
"Act your part!" - and he is. The problem
was that those who have said that wanted m de p to take the center stage - become "a star"
so some of the "light" would be reflected on those close enough to him
to urge him to behave in that way.
There is only One Star, One Light, One Way, One Master, One Lord -
Jesus Christ ! - and the greatest hope any human should
have is to
serve Him while deferring
all the Glory to Him. After all: "Who is like unto God?" (*)
Regarding specific dates for
"sign-posts along the way" events: Following is a prayer offered by
m
de P at least twice a day:
"Lord, help me to get accomplished today
all that You want me to get accomplished, in the order that You Will it
accomplished and in the manner that You desire it to be accomplished. I
do not need dates - I just need Your assistance so that all that needs
to be accomplished by each specific date is accomplished. Then, in
spite of my miseries and limitations, I would have served You as You
intended I do. Amen."
Why?
Because any human
with a certain knowledge of a major catastrophe taking place on a
specific date will not,
we repeat, will not be
able to move and act how and when God wishes in relation with said
upcoming catastrophe without his/her normal human reaction interfering.
We could give examples of how God
has used m de P to greatly
minimize the suffering ("....that waits
humanity as prophecy is fulfilled and Divine Justice dispensed")
resulting from events - very well known worldwide for their destructive
magnitude - yet he did not know he "was doing it" until much later when
God lifted a corner of the veil to show him how he was used. m de P
wishes to assure you - one and all - that if he had known, even if he
had tried not to interfere, his human reactions would have interfered.
Maybe one day some of these stories will be told.
(*) The name "Michael", "Miguel", "Micaiah"
precisely mean: "Who is
like unto God?"
