The M+G+R Foundation
The Manifestation of the AntiChrist
0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0
Post Publication Letters/Questions
Now Addressed
PURPOSE: As the
logical result of our
publication regarding the identity of the AntiChrist, many valid
questions were asked and comments made. We have now compiled such
questions and comments with the appropriate responses for the benefit
of the Faithful. They follow in chronological order.
From LP
@ USA [Published
on June 5th]
Q. Regarding
your most recent
document naming the AntiChrist I have the following
questions and concerns:
1.
Pertaining to chapter 13 of Revelation: I interpret the beast
from the sea as an evil power that arises outside the Churches, and
openly opposes God..... The beast from the land appears to be a
bishop whose speech seems to be like of a lamb, but his words serve the
dragon - i.e., the prophet of the False Christ. The beast from the land
is allied with the beast from the sea, and both serve the dragon.
2. Given the evil and deceptive
leaders in Church history, how do we know that Ratzinger is supremely
evil and deceptive? Is he really worse than the Popes of the
800s-900s, or those of the Renaissance? Many incorrectly
identified candidates for Antichrist before; what makes the
identification of Ratzinger now for this "honor" different?
3. Does Ratzinger know that he
is serving evil? Does he intend to do what you announce he will?
LP
A. We
shall address the issues that you raise one at a time - just as you
have
numbered them.
1. The Book of Revelations is no different from many other Prophetic
Books of the Old Testament. They contain parallel situations just
as we explained about
Daniel's 70 weeks. When we read 70 weeks, that
could be 70 years for one situation or 7 X 70 = 490 years for another
or 70 years for yet another, etc.
Those two beasts are no different - they are incarnated in different,
yet, complementary ways,
although in this particular case we may be looking at the one that you
have specifically illustrated. You state that the first one
"openly opposes God".
Being in "opposition to God" does
not necessarily mean making such opposition obvious. Just because
Escrivá bathed himself in false piety - his very being, life and
methodology are in complete opposition to what God truly
represents. As
if that were not enough of a misrepresentation, he produces his little
book which he calls "The
Way". There is only one
"Way" and that "Way" is Jesus Christ and the New
Testament more than suffices to indicate it.
As an illustrative counterbalance, review Don Bosco trajectory.
His
entire trajectory
was as harmonious, as it could possible be for a human, with the
teachings of Jesus Christ. No imagination nor explanations were
necessary - it was obvious in all he did. This is why we have
stated elsewhere that to compare Escrivá to St. John Bosco would
be like comparing the FalseChrist to Jesus Christ.
Another example of the duality of Prophetic Books may be found with
Babylon the Great. In the Book of Revelations Babylon assumes two
general roles as well as two specific
roles. In one case it represents certain nations or cities as well as
organized religion in general; in another case it represents one
specific nation
and one specific church.
2. When the "tip of the iceberg" is: Who...
would dare to raise his voice with words of reproach to the True and
Living God while claiming to be a Successor of Peter? one can
very well imagine what the "rest of the iceberg" is like. Who else
would
appoint
a
man as Levada as the Guardian of the Catholic Faith [Prefect
of the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith] while the Faith destroying
sexual
scandal of the Roman Church in the US still is "Prime Time" news and
far from settled?
You question our identification of the AntiChrist: That is
reasonable, however, we remind you of our statement regarding what
miguel de
Portugal has to say:
Should
you believe what miguel de Portugal says through the pages of The M+G+R
Foundation? You do not have to. What is written is only for those who
have eyes to see and have ears to hear. Woe to miguel if he does not
speak loud and clear. Nothing has changed in the manner in which God
has communicate with His children in the last 6,000 years.
3. No, he
does not know that he is serving evil. Hitler nor Lenin didn't
know
either and neither did Escrivá. satan makes sure that
many of those whom he uses to do his "dirty work" believe that whatever
they are doing
is for a "good cause" - after all, Eve just wanted to be like God
and know the difference between good and evil.
Many times we have said that the
basic scoundrel - whether politician
or businessman who knows he is a scoundrel, brags about it amongst his
peers, and take advantage of anyone he can - is far less dangerous than
those who convince themselves that they are serving God although the
methods are somewhat "ungodly" but.... they firmly believe that
the
"end justify the means". This is precisely why Judas is being
regenerated in the subconscious of mankind right now. When
you
see what awaits humanity you will understand why they had to make such
an effort to justify outright evil in the Name of God.
From RMc @
Europe [Published
on June 5th]
Q. I
thank you for sending out the letter about the identity of the
AntiChrist, and hesitate to annoy you with further questions. But I
can't help wondering if you intended us to pass it on to others, or
keep it private.
It's too awful a topic to bandy around lightly, so I'm saying nothing
to anyone until I know your mind on the matter. Sorry for
troubling you right now, but I feel I need to know what's the right
thing to do.
Thank you again.
RMc
A. We thank you for your most appropriate concern and
question.
God has placed that information in your hands through us, thus, may His
Most Holy Spirit guide you as to how you should use it for His Glory -
as we all strive to
minimize the suffering in the world while Divine Justice is dispensed
and prophecy fulfilled.
The Holy Spirit of God was sent for all who are willing to receive It
with open hearts and child like disposition and not just for a select
few. You did the right thing by asking since at times we have been
moved to place restriction in the information we share. In this case,
however, God wishes to guide individually each recipient of the
information in the manner in which He sees fit under each particular
circumstance.
From Various @
Worldwide [Published
on June 7th]
Q. In
light of your recent
publication about Benedict XVI - Is
the following quotation from a book
(*) by Cardinal Ratzinger
true and what do you think of it?
“Eucharistic
devotion such as is noted in the silent visit by the devout in church
must not be thought of as a conversation with God. This would assume
that God was present there locally and in a confined way. To justify
such an assertion shows a lack of understanding of the Christological
mysteries of the very concept of God. This is repugnant to the serious
thinking of the man who knows about the omnipresence of God. To go to
church on the ground that one can visit God who is present there is a
senseless act which modern man rightfully rejects.”
(*) Source: Die Sacramentale Begrundung
Christliche Existenz by Joseph Ratzinger
Various
A. We have not
reviewed the book, but from a search in the Internet, it appears that
the quotation is indeed from a book authored by Ratzinger.
Such statement certainly agrees with the "enlightened" mentality of the
"great thinkers and theologians" of the Faith - the "Catholics of the
20th and 21st Century". We still remember the "enlightened" seminarists
in the US, referring to us, Adorers of the Blessed Sacrament,
as
"Cookie Worshippers".
Just recently we received a letter which contained the following
phrase: What I see emerging is
a
scholar with some flaws, but who has always been Christ-"o-centric" in
his leanings, and I cannot fault that. Others, have referred
about Ratzinger as the Rottwiler Guardian of the Faith
Neither being Christ-"o-centric" or
Rottweiler Guardian of the Faith
means much since, traditionally, their
only function has been protect their god, which is the institution they
built upon the ashes of the
one
Jesus Christ founded. For this they
have lied, cheated and killed for
centuries.
But leaving that transparent-for-those-who-have-Eyes-to-See
centuries-old-charade, let us get back to such "pearl of wisdom" : To go to
church on the ground that one can visit God who is present there is a
senseless act which modern man rightfully rejects.
Such ignorant statement comes form someone who still has not
read the revelation of the
Secret
Concept of the Most Holy Trinity
given to the world through miguel de Portugal.
God is indeed omnipresent and manifests Himself in
Three Distinct Persons.
When we are Adoring the Blessed Sacrament we are Adoring God
in the Person of Jesus Christ.
If any one of us - any human person - enjoys the company and
consolation
of a loved one, God, Who created us in
His Image, will enjoy
it and be consoled even more we
sit quietly by Him, in the Person of Jesus.
Brethren, the time has come for you to choose sides because
the only
Mercy that is now available is for those who do not know better.
Those who may be reading this or know of our existence, directly or
indirectly,
are
considered as
"knowing better".
From Chris @
US [Published
on June 19th]
Q.
Praised be the Sacred Heart of Jesus!
I am sure that you have a backlog of email regarding this topic, so I
will be very brief.
It did not please me to read this document about the Antichrist. Not
because I disagree with you in any way, but because I had already long
suspected this to be true. When I first saw Ratzinger brought onto the
balcony of St. Peter's to be proclaimed as the new pope last year, an
interior prompting told me - or rather screamed: "fake"! I cannot
explain that, except to say that it was not the result of my personal
opinions, nor of anything which I had read.
I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt over the last year, but
that interior prompting kept repeating over & over. This despite my
efforts to put aside all predictions, prophecies, and writings
indicating this reality which you have clarified to be true. My
attempts at objectivity and reserve may have
been well intentioned, but were wrong. One way or the other, God tells
us what we need to know.
Whether we listen or not!
There are two terrifying realities: that which you have pointed out,
and the fact that most people do and will reject this notion. The
latter is much more
frightening, because those souls who stick their heads in the sand and
refuse to believe what is before their eyes are ready to be sifted all
the more by
Satan. I truly do pray for them, that they may be awakened, before it
is too late for their souls.
May God have mercy upon me for my many sins.
Chris
A.
...and may God have Mercy upon us all for our many sins.
We are sharing your entire letter with the world because it contains
most of the elements present in the souls of those who have "Eyes to
See and Ears to Hear",
up to and including the rare "My attempts at objectivity and
reserve may have been well intentioned, but were wrong. One way
or the other, God tells us what we need to know."
That is why we try to explain to
all that true spiritual interaction/experiences cannot be faked, on
purpose or not. However, one has to live them to truly understand that.
In the lower scale of spiritual sensitivity are those who have Eyes to
See and Ear to Hear but
cannot just yet. It is for them that the volume of God's
megaphone is slowly increased in the hopes that they "snap out
of
their denial state"
without the need to increase the volume further.
Those who will never See nor Hear come from all walks of life,
yet, amazingly enough, a very large percentage of them come from
amongst the pious regular church attendees. We must keep clearly
in mind, and continue to announce, that Salvation comes from
Faith
in
Jesus Christ and not
from faith in an institution, any institution or any other individual.
Humans will be amazed what they
will find out when "all is said and done" and the End of These Times
have given way to a new
life on Earth. The most repeated
thought/words will be: "But I thought that so and so was so holy and he
did not make it!" or "I would have never guessed that so and so would be counted amongst
the Elect!"
How blind men are! Look at Eve! She thought that she could second
guess God!... and then Adam "bought her story".
m de P knows of individuals in hell (literally) about whom no one would
have
ever "guessed it" in the proverbial "million years". [Incidentally -
this, although an extremely rare case, is not a pleasant
knowledge to possess nor is the one of someone amongst the living that
may be there soon.]
Therefore, we must continue to blow the "wake up trumpet" until,
finally, the Seventh Trumpet sounds. We take consolation in the
knowledge of God's Mercy In Action - Explained supernaturally
and
witnessed in
"Black and White".
We thank you for writing and
giving us this Golden Opportunity to help others.
From DS @
Ireland [Published
on June 19th]
Q.
I've read your article on the Anti-Christ and I must say it sent a
shudder down my spine. Reading your web site over the last year or so
has been
very helpful and has aided in putting my Catholic faith into
perspective versus the difficulty and challenge we face as members of
the global church. I'm sure you are being faced with many questions
following the posting, I won't bother you too many of with mine at the
moment although the way I would see it is as follows.
1) Miguel de Portugal who I have
conversed with over cyberspace for over a year and whose web site has
made me think and challenge by thoughts on Christianity and my own lack
of it at times has
2) Declared
that the Pope, Benedict XVI, is the antichrist
3) That
the end times are upon us.
Of course I have taken time to
reflect on you're
writings and whether you are someone I could trust and whether more
importantly that the documents you have prepared have been
directed to you through the Holy Spirit or whether you could be
misguided.
In my world God deals in absolutes not maybes.
I pray that you'll forgive me for saying this but my mind is still
uncertain if Miguel de Portugal, a man I have never met is in dialogue
with God.
I have the utmost respect for you and believe from a logical point of
view the documents you have released. I pray that the world changes and
that we have a Christian world to bring our children up in. I believe
in the word of Jesus Christ healing us of all our weaknesses and
helping us in forgiving others of theirs. Eventually we'll all be
judged upon how well we truly live our lives by this.
DS
A. Let us see... This fine scientist ["In my world God
deals in absolutes not maybes"]
has been
reading our web site over the last year or so and has actually
exchanged
off-the-record correspondence with m de P and did not know that our
function - the purpose of m
de P's existence - is
because we are rapidly approaching the End of These Times?
Every
single document has at the bottom a link to About Us - Our Purpose; we
have
published What Time Is
It? and It
Is
About That Time and too many documents to
just list here which
address this issue squarely; a link to a brief
biography of miguel de Portugal is available from many documents,
including, About Us, and yet, someone is shocked and surprised that we
are
announcing the End of These Times even though we have published its
Road Map?
This very fine gentleman continued: "Of
course I have taken time to reflect on you're
writings and whether you are someone I could trust and whether more
importantly that the documents you have prepared have been directed to
you through the Holy Spirit or whether you could be misguided."
Who can be "....very helpful
and has aided in putting
my Catholic faith into perspective versus the difficulty and challenge
we face as members of the
global church."? A misguided spirit? A misguided spirit
who upholds the
Catholic
Faith to where not even those who
pretend to
be
Shepherds dare? A misguided spirit who calls all to the
fountain
of the
Sacraments explaining
the richness they hold? A misguided spirit
who
endorses and
defends some of the most contested positions of the
Administrators of the Roman Church?
The problem lies that when man cannot face reality, man take refuge in
denial even though coherence is demolished.
We thank you for writing and giving us this
Golden Opportunity to help others.
From RB @
Spain [Published
on June 26th]
Q. Peace
and blessings!
(Part 1)
What does it
mean "Elijah indeed shall come, and restore all things"?
Is not Jesus Christ the One who will restore all
things in His Second Coming?
What "all things", precisely, will
Elijah restore?
At the moment of the Second Coming ("when the
Son of Man returns, will He still find faith on the earth?") nobody
will have restored the Faith, so
even less "all things"?
May it be the correct translation "...and
restore all knowledge"?
It would be coherent if a prophet came who will
repair the knowledge as presented to the people, whether or not the
people will be able to assimilate
it.
(Part 2)
Also, it would
be coherent with The M+G+R Foundation's mission, as an advance of
Elijah
mission and echo
of St. John the Baptizer, for "Setting the Record Straight"
RB
A.
Thank you for
the opportunity to finally
address this issue now.
(Part 1)
In
Matthew 17 we read: 11 But he answering, said to them: Elijah indeed shall
come, and restore all things.
12 But I say to you, that Elijah is already
come, and they knew
him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they had a mind. So also the
Son of man shall suffer from them.
As far as we know, it was
Msgr. Juan
Straubinger
who truly understood this veiled meaning (and published it in
1969). In his footnote of the
above quoted verse he states (in Spanish which we are now translating
into English):
Jesus does not deny it; He
actually confirms that the
mission of John the Baptizer is that of Elijah. However, He tells
them in verses Nos. 11-15 that His messianic mission will be violently
rejected, and then, Elijah will
have to come at the End of These Times
as the precursor of His Triumph. [Additional references Luke 1, 17; 16,
16; Malachi 3:1; 4, 5]
Luke 1: 16
And he shall convert many of the children of Israel to the Lord their
God.
17 And he shall go before him in the spirit
and power of Elijah;
that he may turn the hearts of the fathers unto the children, and the
incredulous to the wisdom of the just, to prepare unto the Lord a
perfect people.
Luke 16:
16 The law and the prophets were until John; from that time the
kingdom of God is preached, and every one useth violence towards it.
Malachi 3:
1
Behold I send my angel, and he shall prepare the way
before my face. And presently the Lord, whom you seek, and the angel of
the testament, whom you desire, shall come to his temple. Behold he
cometh, saith the Lord of hosts. .4
And the sacrifice of Juda and of Jerusalem shall please the Lord, as in
the days of old, and in the ancient years.
5 And I will come to you in judgment, and
will be a speedy
witness against sorcerers, and adulterers, and false swearers, and them
that oppress the hireling in his wages; the widows, and the fatherless:
and oppress the stranger, and have not feared me, saith the Lord of
hosts.
(Part 2)
There
is indeed coherence, and even more, - for those
who have Eyes to
See and Ears
to Hear - considering what is to be restored before the Second Coming
of Christ at the End of These Times (and not
at the End of Time): Enough faith
with
which to receive Him.
Without that "core of faith" it
would be mystically impossible for Him
to manifest in time His Second Coming. As we have said before,
there are Laws which regulate the supernatural domain just as there are
Laws which regulate the physical domain and God, whenever possible,
"Plays by the Rules" He Himself set at the time of Creation.
From
DS Sr. @
Ireland [Published
on July 4th - U.S. Independence Day and St. Elizabeth of Portugal]
Q.
The Peace and love of our Saviour be with you.
We have studied your article on The Identification of
the
AntiChrist,
and feel very, very sad about our Holy Father the Pope Benedict.
You see we have to test all things, and we know the face of our Holy Father,
but we do not know the face
of Miguel De Portugal, and therefore it is difficult to accept
that he is right. I am sure you can understand our thoughts on this
subject. Why we should take Miguel De Portugal's word as correct.
We have always valued the inspiration we received from Miguel De
Portugal, now we are left wondering - WHO IS MIGUEL DE PORTUGAL, as
this is very very serious, we would be glad if you could respond and
maybe we could see who he is and where he comes from.
DS Sr.
A.
We responded, indirectly, through an answer to DS
on
June
19th - see above. Then, DS Sr. blocked our mail from his server.
This is why designer clothing and accessories have become such a force
in society, thus world economy, since the second half of the 20th
Century. Before, people could recognize a fine material, a fine design,
a fine execution of whatever the item in question was. Now, clothing,
bags, most accessories, etc. must have a designer's name (face) so that
they be recognized as of quality (read: expensive).
As we have said before, the physical domain reflects the spiritual
domain. This is exactly why Jesus fit Isaiah's description:
Is 54: 1 Who hath believed our report? and to whom
is the arm of the Lord revealed?
2 And he shall grow up as a
tender plant before him, and as a
root out of a thirsty ground: there is no
beauty in him, nor
comeliness: and we have seen him, and there was no sightliness, that we
should be desirous of him:
Amazingly enough, as devoted as
DS Sr. may be, using his same logic, he, most likely, would have
participated in the crucifixion of Jesus - after all, he would have
reasoned that "he knew the face of Caiphas" but not of Jesus or
John the Baptist.
We know that these are harsh words, but so was the silence that led to
100 million deaths and untold suffering in World War II. God, Whom
m de
P serves, is finished with "Tip toeing through the tulips while Tiny
Tim strums his bizarre ukulele" - we have fully entered the period of
the two edged sword:
Apocalypse
19: 15 And out
of his mouth proceedeth a sharp two edged sword;
that with it he may strike the nations. And he shall rule them with a
rod of iron; and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness of the
wrath of God the Almighty.
